Jump to content


Mint CCA 2nd opinion needed


williamzz
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5584 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello All

I'm new to all this cca stuff but have done a fair bit reading of these forums

trying to get to grips with everything.

 

I've recently received a CCA response from Mint and need the experts here to

take a gander and tell me if the "agreement" is enforceable.

 

I applied for this credit card in Jan 2006.

 

Thanks in advance.

 

This is what they sent me:

 

DSC03979.jpg

 

DSC03981-a.jpg

 

DSC03983-a-1.jpg

 

DSC03984-a.jpg

 

DSC03985-a-1.jpg

 

 

DSC03986-a.jpg

 

Hope you can read them ok.

Edited by williamzz
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply. Edited the personal info out.

 

I thought this was unenforceable because the application booklet (first four pages) is obviously an application form and is the only thing I signed.

 

On this app booklet the credit limit is not specified, it just says "we will give you notice of your credit limit".

 

To me that is a prescribed term which is not present. Am I wrong?

 

The "agreement" on the 6th page does not contain a signature box or any other personal info about me so I can't see how this is enforceable either.

 

Of course I could be completely wrong, that's why I need you opinions.

 

Please help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

An application form can double up as an agreement provided that the prescribed terms are contained within the 'four corners' of the agreement.

 

In this case it is clear that this is one document (page 1 of 3 etc. and the common code number).

 

From Schedule 6 of the Agreement Regs.

 

Credit limit

3. Agreements for running-account credit.

 

A term stating the credit limit or the manner in which it will be determined or that there is no credit limit.

 

 

From OFT Guidance

 

The credit limit can be expressed as:

a a sum of money, or

b a statement that the trader will, under the agreement, periodically determine the credit limit and notify the customer, or

c a sum of money together with a statement that the trader may, under the agreement, periodically vary the credit limit and notify the customer, or

d if (a) (b) or © above are not appropriate either a statement indicating how the credit limit will be determined and notified to the customer or a statement that there is no credit limit.

The OFT Guidance seems to support the statement that Mint have put in regard to the Credit Limit.

 

IMHO you would have extreme difficulty persuading a judge that this document is irredeemably unenforceable on the basis of that credit limit statement.

 

Page 6 is the current T&Cs so would not bear your signature.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Will,

 

just came over after your post on the main CCA thread

 

I'm inclined to agree with Steve that it looks enforceable

 

Would be interesting to get a look at the original document though to know for sure it was all one document and its not a photoshop construction

 

Though obviously the only way to that is a court case, which would be very risk based on the above

 

Good luck with charges though

 

NcF

omnia praesumuntur legitime facta donec probetur in contrarium

 

 

Please note: I am not a member of the legal profession, all advice given is purely my opinion, if in doubt consult a professional

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...