Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Multiple Scottish claims


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6569 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hey all,

I cannot find a definate answer to my situation.

Im in Scotland and will need to serve around 8 small claims against the BOS to get ALL my money back.

I've read 3 different views on multiple claims.

1. you have to claim all in one go as the reason for all the claims is the same - unlawful charges.

2. do one after the other in case the bank consolidate claims into one biggy and take me out of the small claims procedure.

3. do 1 one week, number 2 the next week, 3 the week later...... to make sure all court dates are separate.

 

Can anyone clarify this please?

Claim submitted on 6/6/6 and the return date is 18/8, 11 weeks to wait :o .i think i must live in a very bad area.

Im going to be at this till im 100 i think.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mairi. Good question. I'm afraid I don't know the answer, but I will watch this thread with interest.

 

Good luck!

Abbey - 547.00 settled in full.

Second claim: £204 WON.

Barclaycard - 142.88 incl interest due WON BY DEFAULT as they didn't even bother entering a defence. Barclaycard paid up £184.88.

 

MBNA - Concluded £634.31

Capital One Concluded £148

Kinda disappointed I've no more banks to go after now...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mairi,

 

As far as I can understand up here in Scotland the situation is that if your claim is for over £750 to one bank then you are advised to split up or sever the claim. Then you go through the court process with one claim at a time waiting till you get your money for the first claim before starting the second.

 

This is because if you were to run several claims concurrently then there is the possibility that the bank would try to consolidate them which would then take you over the £750 limit and out of the small claims track.

 

Now the general opinion is that the bank is still unlikely to fight the case but the danger is that once you are out of Small Claims then every thing has to be done correctly and if you made a mistake the bank could get the case thrown out of court. You would then potentially be liable for costs etc.

 

If you do a forum search on the word 'sever' there is a lot more information.

 

This is my understanding of the situation but as I am not a solicitor you should have a search about.

 

Hope this helps clarify things a bit

 

 

Woolfie

Advice & opinions given by Woolfie are my own, and are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Woolfie

Thanks for the reply.

reading a thread http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=8784&highlight=sever

"claim amount over small claims limit" posted by aaronmcl

jonni2bad's replies have me a little concerned. Ill see if i can catch him around the site and ask him. Think i need to just stop worrying, only 9 weeks to go

mairi

Link to post
Share on other sites

Claim submitted on 6/6/6 and the return date is 18/8, 11 weeks to wait :o .i think i must live in a very bad area.

Im going to be at this till im 100 i think.

 

there seems to be a huge variation in time scales, my return date was 3.5 weeks after service. Maybe they are taking summer holidays in to account with yours ?

Dont give up.

Bank of Scotland round 1: £740 + costs settled, still sore over the 8% grrr

Bank of Scotland round 2: £629 +101.15 interest +£39 costs settled.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...