Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Barclays CAN provide pre-6 yr Woolwich data


welshcakes
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6169 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Peeps

 

Just thought I'd let Woolwich claimers know that I have received an email from a legal Executive staff member working in Barclays Legal & Litigation Department confirming that even if your Woolwich account has been closed for years, Barclays can still access and provide S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) data for you account.

 

This is contrary to Barclays consistently telling claimers over the phone, via email and in their letter correspondence, that they are unable to supply statememts/transactions lists for Woolwich accounts for any further back than 6 yrs from the date of making your request.

 

If you are seeking a complete list of transactions for your banking history a Woolwich customer (as is you right under the Data Protection Act), do not be fobbed off with Barclay's adamnant claims that they don't hold the data anymore. It is not true. Up to 12 years worth (as far as I know) of copy statements can be sent to you by:

 

Woolwich Openplan Customer Contact Centre

The Woolwich

Jackson House

Jackson Road

Clacton on Sea

ESSEX CO15 1WH

 

Tel 0845 0700 360

 

 

Threaten them with action and when the time comes, take it.

 

This is what I have had to do to get them to release the last 7yrs worth of Woolwich statements on a current account I closed in 2003.

3 Active Claims:

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Sole account) - Applied to lift court ordered Stay

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Joint account) - Awaiting court date

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Joint account) Pre-6 yrs- LBA sent.

 

 

3 Wins :

Barclays t/a The Woolwich (Data Protection Act breach costs & compliance)

HSBC (on behalf of brother)

Settled Out of Court - £3,874.76

Alliance & Leicester (on behalf of friend)

Settled Out of Court - £723.41

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have today sent off my SAR for pre-6yr data.

 

To hopefully speed things up, I have extended my request letter as shown below:

 

Michele Wallis

Sales and Service Manager

Woolwich Openplan Customer Contact Centre

The Woolwich

Jackson House

Jackson Road

Clacton on Sea

ESSEX CO15 1WH

xxxxxxxx 2007

 

Data Protection Act 1998

Subject Access Request

 

 

Dear Ms Wallis

ACCOUNT NUMBER: xxxxxxxxxxx

Please supply me with a complete list of transactions and charges relating to my banking history with your organisation covering period of opening of the account in or around xxxxxxxxx to closure xxxxxxxx. Alternatively, a complete set of statements for that period will be acceptable.

Please note that this written request specifically requires you to provide a complete list of transactions and charges relating to the entire banking history with the Woolwich for account xxxxxxxxxx.

The request is not limited simply to charges or to activity affecting the account only in the last six years. Please be advised that the Limitation Act 1980 does not apply to the provision of data requested as a Subject Access Request made under the Data Protection Act 1998 and I do not therefore expect to receive a response suggesting such. Consequently, should The Woolwich chose to cite the Limitations Act and in the absence of complete compliance with the terms of this request, I will immediately commence legal action against Barclays Bank PLC t/s The Woolwich for breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 and you may be required to attend future legal proceedings as a witness.

In addition, I am asking for information that relates to any manual intervention by any member of your staff.

Whilst not exhaustive and for the avoidance of doubt I shall list what I require:

  • Full copies of all contracts that exist between myself and your organisation; including copies of any documents you hold in support of same.
  • Copies of all statements relating to the above accounts.
  • Copies of all correspondence, including all letters, faxes, emails and memos sent and received between ourselves, and any other third party in relation to any of the above accounts. This must also include internal communication that relates to my personal banking business.
  • Copies of all documents which include any of my personal information including copies of any contracts or invoices, emails or computer records containing my personal information, or any records which pertain to this information.
  • Full details and copies of any documents upon which you relied when you have provided my personal or financial information to any individual, organisation or third party.
  • Full copies or transcripts of any computer logs or database records kept in relation to myself or in relation to my financial or personal information.
  • Details of all systems you currently have in place to ensure my personal or financial information is kept securely, including details of those officers who currently have control of same, and at the time it was held or provided to a third party.

  • Where any previous information or records held have been deleted or disposed of, the methods used to do so, including dates, reason for deletion, certificates or references confirming details of destruction. Where you are unable to provide such certificates, please provide a declaration, signed by an authorised officer of your company, confirming the dates and methods of destruction of this data.

If you are unable to supply this data because there has been no such manual intervention, then please be so kind as to confirm this in your response.

I enclose the statutory maximum fee of £10. You have 40 days in which to comply and I expect this request to be entirely complied with by no later than xxxxxx.

If there is specific information which you require in order to satisfy yourself as to my identity, please let me know by return. However, please note that the above address is the one which you normally use to communicate my private business to me and which you have hitherto found to be acceptable.

Yours faithfully

3 Active Claims:

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Sole account) - Applied to lift court ordered Stay

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Joint account) - Awaiting court date

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Joint account) Pre-6 yrs- LBA sent.

 

 

3 Wins :

Barclays t/a The Woolwich (Data Protection Act breach costs & compliance)

HSBC (on behalf of brother)

Settled Out of Court - £3,874.76

Alliance & Leicester (on behalf of friend)

Settled Out of Court - £723.41

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...