Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Grant123 Vs BOS/HBOS.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6087 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 155
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Grant123

 

IMHO means in my humble opinion,

 

There is a chance that any new cases against the banks will be stayed by the courts in England while they wait for the High Court decision, however it is probably a good idea to submit the case as leaving could affect the limitations i.e how far back you can go. Just be prepared for a long wait on the other hand you might be lucky and not get a stayed:-)

 

Cheers

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]They don't like it up 'em Mr Mannering :-o

 

Abbey Claiming £1241.00

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) requested - 17/02/2007

Prelim sent - 26/03/2007

LBA sent - 13/04/2007

Summary Cause - 22/05/2007

Form 11 - 29/06/2007 (no defence submitted)

Extract of Payment sent 01/08/2007 ALMOST THERE!

*** WON *** Cheque recieved 13/9/2007

 

Lloyds TSB Claiming £1335.00

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent - 07/03/2007

Prelim sent - 13/04/2007

LBA sent - 03/05/2007

Summary Cause - 22/05/2007

Form 11 - 29/06/2007 (no defence submitted)

Extract of Payment sent 01/08/2007 ALMOST THERE

**WON** Cheque received 6/9/2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again

Please remember that what I am suggesting is in the middle of a transition period and everything is changing fast and my suggestion is only that and based on what I have picked up plus a bit of latteral thinking.

 

Stevokenevos suggestion was perfectly good and people in Scotland were on occassions using a relatives address in England and the local court. That appeared to work well and it did for him and others. Best was furthest north of England as possible in case you needed to travel to court at short notice. As Maryhillgull has stated, this possibility has changed slightly.

 

The current situation may turn out that cases will be stayed in England, sometime soon. However, this has not happened yet, but must be considered as likely/ possible. You could just get away with it however. The legal situation in Scotland is likely to be different and cases may well continue, from what I understand.

 

The FOS as you know is not a possibility. Thats our tough luck unfortunately.

 

I did not file at court and have settled 3 accounts with HBOS- VERY LUCKY!!! However, it shows what can be done by phoning them constantly. You could consider this approach.

 

One of the big complaints against HBOS is the way they refuse some claims yet pay out on others eg me and others of course, of which there are many. You can put that to them directly and in writing. You seem to have sent your claim letter on 20 July, which is not that long ago. Who sent the refusal letter,, as this sounds like the first stage refusal, I may be wrong. So please give a little more info.

 

Will check in later to see what other facts are!!

 

:)

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Stevokenevos suggestion was perfectly good and people in Scotland were on occassions using a relatives address in England and the local court. That appeared to work well and it did for him and others. Best was furthest north of England as possible in case you needed to travel to court at short notice. As Maryhillgull has stated, this possibility has changed slightly.

 

Just to point out, you do NOT need an english address to claim in england, all you do is fill in the N1 form online, print it off and post it to the court local to the defendant e.g your banks english headquarters address.

 

The Moderators and helpers are working on a petition which will allow cases to continue and overturn any 'stays' which may or may not be imposed.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning guys

 

I'm 99% sorted now.

 

But................

 

Thanks very very much for your replies. I really appreciate them.

 

I was thinking about using the MCOL system for my claims as opposed to thge N1 , purely because of the higher claim limit.

 

Does anyone have any thoughts on this ?

 

Cheers

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning, sorry but I have no personal experience. Someone will help though and we will get you there.

 

I do still think that you might be able to get this sorted by calling HBOS at the claim team. Worth a shot??:)

 

Might also be better if your thread was in HBOS forum- could a mod or site helper please assist and move this thread over to HBOS?? Thanx!:) :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Depends on how you are claiming interest Grant.

 

If you are using spreadie to calculate charges then this is how mine looks

 

5: Accordingly the Claimant claims:

 

a). The return of the amounts debited in respect of the charges in the sum of £xxxx.xx

b). Court costs in the sum of £xxx/xx

c). The claimant claims interest under Section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% per year as from date of first charge to date of filing of N1 in the sum of £xxx.xx and also at the same rate up to the date of Judgement/Settlement at £xx.xx per day ( to get this multipy a + b by 0.0022 this wil give daily rate in pence. You can also add £10 SAR fee if you paid it here I believe if not some-one will correct this) OR at such a rate and for any such periods as the Court deems just.

d). Here you can add your £10.00 SAR fee if applicable.

 

I have also added another para here "the Claimant will also ask for any and all cost incurred by Him in bringing this action to be paid by the Defendant"

 

don`t know how this will work I`m trying to get money back for postage, stationary, Book and Lawpack small claims kit ( SEE LINKS ON LEFT, GOOD INVESTMENT) so far over £100.00 plus time for day off work to attend Court. Parking fees kept all reciepts etc. I`m not holding my breath on this, but After all Howard`s p*ssing me around it is worth a try. poke.gif

 

Hope this helps.

=======================================================================================================

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

 

 

Halifax Won £1180.00

NatWest Won £876.00

Halifax 2 N1 submitted 20/07/07 stayed 24/08/07 N244 Application filed 31/08/07 hearing set for 12/11/07 rescheduled for 29/01/2008. Application dismissed stay still in place.

Charity Group £200 compo for lost passport.

HM revenue & Customs; demand for WTC overpayment £632.12. Disputed, their error. Did not have to repay.

All opinions expressed are my own and have no legal standing and no connection to CAG

 

All errors/typos etc are not my fault the blame lies with the spelling gremlins

 

<<<<<< If any of this has been helpful, PLEASE click my scales

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi sorry maybe did'ne explain myself to well it was the part in the lilac font I was to sure about.

c) The claimant claims interest under section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year, from [date when the money became owed to you] to [the date you are issuing the claim] of £ [amount] and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of [enter the daily rate of interest]

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah it is date of first charge to date of filing of N1.

=======================================================================================================

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

 

 

Halifax Won £1180.00

NatWest Won £876.00

Halifax 2 N1 submitted 20/07/07 stayed 24/08/07 N244 Application filed 31/08/07 hearing set for 12/11/07 rescheduled for 29/01/2008. Application dismissed stay still in place.

Charity Group £200 compo for lost passport.

HM revenue & Customs; demand for WTC overpayment £632.12. Disputed, their error. Did not have to repay.

All opinions expressed are my own and have no legal standing and no connection to CAG

 

All errors/typos etc are not my fault the blame lies with the spelling gremlins

 

<<<<<< If any of this has been helpful, PLEASE click my scales

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Grant, I think some have and Barclays lost a load had them set aside. there is a thread about on here somewhere. But IMHO I dont think thay they will apply for stays as they have to ask for each individual claim and it will cost them loads, and as they will prob expect to lose in the current situation, I just can`t see it happening. Good luck!!

=======================================================================================================

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

 

 

Halifax Won £1180.00

NatWest Won £876.00

Halifax 2 N1 submitted 20/07/07 stayed 24/08/07 N244 Application filed 31/08/07 hearing set for 12/11/07 rescheduled for 29/01/2008. Application dismissed stay still in place.

Charity Group £200 compo for lost passport.

HM revenue & Customs; demand for WTC overpayment £632.12. Disputed, their error. Did not have to repay.

All opinions expressed are my own and have no legal standing and no connection to CAG

 

All errors/typos etc are not my fault the blame lies with the spelling gremlins

 

<<<<<< If any of this has been helpful, PLEASE click my scales

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

=======================================================================================================

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

 

 

Halifax Won £1180.00

NatWest Won £876.00

Halifax 2 N1 submitted 20/07/07 stayed 24/08/07 N244 Application filed 31/08/07 hearing set for 12/11/07 rescheduled for 29/01/2008. Application dismissed stay still in place.

Charity Group £200 compo for lost passport.

HM revenue & Customs; demand for WTC overpayment £632.12. Disputed, their error. Did not have to repay.

All opinions expressed are my own and have no legal standing and no connection to CAG

 

All errors/typos etc are not my fault the blame lies with the spelling gremlins

 

<<<<<< If any of this has been helpful, PLEASE click my scales

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sokay lots have helped me. payback time LOL

=======================================================================================================

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

 

 

Halifax Won £1180.00

NatWest Won £876.00

Halifax 2 N1 submitted 20/07/07 stayed 24/08/07 N244 Application filed 31/08/07 hearing set for 12/11/07 rescheduled for 29/01/2008. Application dismissed stay still in place.

Charity Group £200 compo for lost passport.

HM revenue & Customs; demand for WTC overpayment £632.12. Disputed, their error. Did not have to repay.

All opinions expressed are my own and have no legal standing and no connection to CAG

 

All errors/typos etc are not my fault the blame lies with the spelling gremlins

 

<<<<<< If any of this has been helpful, PLEASE click my scales

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello everybody

 

Has anyone has a stay placed on their case at Halifax Crown Court ?

 

I've found a list, link below which says they are staying all cases can anyone confirm this ?

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/109936-find-out-here-if.html?highlight=groovycaz

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...