Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

novice computer user v barclays.*WON DEFENCE THOWN OUT*


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5958 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Tezl-thank u

Been there,done that, have the t-shirt x 2 so far (have 4 sons). They don't listen, think they know it all. Do we let them sink and learn their lesson or pick up the pieces?-so far I've done the former. Much to OH's disgust. He's tougher than me!!!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tezl-thank u

Been there,done that, have the t-shirt x 2 so far (have 4 sons). They don't listen, think they know it all. Do we let them sink and learn their lesson or pick up the pieces?-so far I've done the former. Much to OH's disgust. He's tougher than me!!!!!!!!!!!

come on , you know we do both of the above, my dad did not he was a seargeant in army if we sank he would hold us under a bit longer to know the errors of our ways.did not do us any harm.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not really had bad migraine since just before noon ....... at the 'feel like ive neither won nor lost' stage at the moment

take a bldy rest from the computer then, still be here when you feel better,can i call you meg again please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tez,u right.

My dad was of the old school 2 = parachute reg. Was there when I really needed him (wish he still was) but kids these days expect everthing 4 nothing even tho we try 2 teach them different. Yes,Saint should take a rest she's trying to do too much.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well,well,well, i had you down as a frustrated office wiz kid waiting to be head hunted by a bank to head their customer relations department with meg i mean saintly1 as your personal assistant.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks tezl, but we're only passing on what we learnt through our process.

 

But I do think, looking through the other forums, that WE do have the most and fastest response times. some threads on other forums lay unanswered for days....

.

http://www.findmadeleine.com/

http://news.sky.com/skynews/madeleine

 

If I dont reply to a direct question please feel free to PM me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

[quote=dar£n;946104

But I do think, looking through the other forums, that WE do have the most and fastest response times. some threads on other forums lay unanswered for days....

 

Sometimes they don't get answered at all actually

28/2/07

Sent request for repayment of charges totalling £2,800 (I want it ALL back!).

8/3/07

Barclays send sorry your not happy letter

14/3/07

Letter before action sent

25/4/07

Barclays offer £1,790

27/4/07

Thanks but no thanks to the offer sent

28/4/07

Filed with mcol, now looking at a figure of £3,500, they should of paid up when i asked nicely :-D

11/5/07

Barclays acknowledge claim

30/5/07

Barclays defend claim

19/6/07

Received notice of transfer to Northampton County Court and barclays excuse for a defence!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have seen 1 guy in particular on both Barclaycard and Cap1 forums that seems to be talking to himself... wont mention any names

 

madeleine150x120.gif

was feeling okay about things today until you put this up, i am now here with tears rolling down my face thinking what if she were mine and what the family are going through .itmakes this whole buisness of charges seem so trivial.people should start treating each other with respect and fairness.the banks should look at themselves and see how they are actually distroying peoples lives.just blabbering now will stop.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sometimes they don't get answered at all actually

 

i try to go through the unanswered ones and see if they Do require an answer, some are just updates or progress postings, some are also people starting new threads for no reason.

.

http://www.findmadeleine.com/

http://news.sky.com/skynews/madeleine

 

If I dont reply to a direct question please feel free to PM me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i try to go through the unanswered ones and see if they Do require an answer, some are just updates or progress postings, some are also people starting new threads for no reason.

Oh no Dar£n not the barclays bit, some of the others, our barclays forum is fab :)

28/2/07

Sent request for repayment of charges totalling £2,800 (I want it ALL back!).

8/3/07

Barclays send sorry your not happy letter

14/3/07

Letter before action sent

25/4/07

Barclays offer £1,790

27/4/07

Thanks but no thanks to the offer sent

28/4/07

Filed with mcol, now looking at a figure of £3,500, they should of paid up when i asked nicely :-D

11/5/07

Barclays acknowledge claim

30/5/07

Barclays defend claim

19/6/07

Received notice of transfer to Northampton County Court and barclays excuse for a defence!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

i try to go through the unanswered ones and see if they Do require an answer, some are just updates or progress postings, some are also people starting new threads for no reason.

lost now

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it was my fault not being very clear what I meant when I posted :)

28/2/07

Sent request for repayment of charges totalling £2,800 (I want it ALL back!).

8/3/07

Barclays send sorry your not happy letter

14/3/07

Letter before action sent

25/4/07

Barclays offer £1,790

27/4/07

Thanks but no thanks to the offer sent

28/4/07

Filed with mcol, now looking at a figure of £3,500, they should of paid up when i asked nicely :-D

11/5/07

Barclays acknowledge claim

30/5/07

Barclays defend claim

19/6/07

Received notice of transfer to Northampton County Court and barclays excuse for a defence!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...