Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Zeusie v RBS Credit Card


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6277 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I sent my prelim letter (rec. del.) to RBS for repayment of late payment charges (plus interest of 8%) on the 16th of February (sent it to Southend on Sea.) The account is a closed account.

 

No response at all was received from RBS so I followed that up with a LBA (rec. del.) on 6th March 2007.

 

[A letter sent to Mint Credit Card operations at the same address, on the same day, in respect of a closed account with them, was acknowledged and reponded to and following a LBA to MINT they have indicated that they will now cough up in full, with interest.]

 

However, no response was received from RBS (even though they and MINT are effectively the same company and so far I haven't had time to lodge the claim. I called them today to try and speak to someone about the lack of ANY response. I thought that as at least one part of their operations (i.e MINT) had seen the light and are paying out at the LBA stage that, the RBS side would acting in a similar manner and there had just been a slight oversight or a backlog in respect of my claim.

 

However, I spoke to a most unhelpful member of staff who advised me to write in again. I spelt out that i had already given them five weeks in which to respond and they had failed even to acknolwedge my complaint which I had detailed in two letters and that this was a courtesy call in order to allow them to avoid a court action. She said there was no note of my account on their system, as it is closed, and she couldn't even tell me if my letters had been recieved or if they were being dealt with in any way. She said that there was no one i could speak to about the matter and there was nothing she could do for me at all.

 

I didn't expect my money back at the first hurdle but I am VERY ****ed off at RBS for COMPLETELY ignoring my letters. It beggars belief that one side of their operations can be so proactive in dealing with requests for reimbursement of penalty charges while the other side is a shambles.

 

So a small claims action it is then.

 

First date I can get to the court to lodge my small claim is on Thursday (29th). I wonder if the RBS will be able to find my account details when the summons arrives? :rolleyes:

 

As well filing a claim, I think I'll write to the FOS regarding the fact they have completely ignored my complaint altogether. :mad:

 

I take the address for the small claim is their Edinburgh registered address?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...