Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

poza78 vs hsbc **WON**


poza78
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6266 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I am currently in the process of claiming back charges from the HSBC. They sent me 6 years bank statements without charging the £10 admin fee and have replied to 2nd letter stating they will contact me with a full response as soon as they have completed investigations. The LETTER BEFORE ACTION is due to go out this Thursday 25th Jan 2007 so I will keep you posted.

 

regards

 

poza

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi poza

just send the lba as planned and always stick to your oriiginal timetable. the 'we will investigate and come back to you' letter is just a stall so carry on and rightfully claim what is yours

good luck

netty

If i've been helpful in any way....then tip my scales over there!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just received a letter from the HSBC offering me the full amount requested less interest as they do not accept the interest added as appropriate.

 

I believe several people who have successful claims have received this letter will know what it contains, basically they say that their fees are fair and if the matter was to go to court they believe that they would successfully resist any challenges in relation to these fees. The offer comes as a result of them being mindful of the management time and irrecoverable legal costs that they may incur in relation to such a claim.

 

So what do I do next please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

entirely up to you...........can you live with what they are offering or do you want to take it further and get the whole amount? sort of depends on your circumstances, your bottle, and what you want out of it.

if you are taking the offer - write back and tell them ok, if not, send the letter of rejection - just tweaking it to your claim. tell them you stand by your letter of xx/xx/07 and they have until xx/xx/07 to offer you the full amount or you will be filing a claim against them. (i'd just give them until the same date you used in the lba).

good luck, whatever you decide. make it right for you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks lateralus, I am going to accept this offer as the interest only amounts to £30 but i will attach a letter to the acceptance form regarding their stance that their charges are not fair and illegal but that as it is only £30 interest. Anyway I've got bigger fish to fry, Im also gong after capital one and RBS when they eventually get the statements to me and these are 4 figure sums so I'll take them all the way to court!!! thanks once again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks and here's a copy of the letter I enclosed with the offer acceptance

 

Dear Colin,

I would like to thank you for your offer and inform you that I do accept it as the amount of interest charged was of a small amount. I still would draw your attention to the terms of the contract, which you agreed to at the time that I opened my account. It is an implied term of that contract that you would conduct yourselves lawfully and in a manner, which complies with UK law.

 

I believe that your charges are disproportionately high and therefore they are contrary to the Unfair Terms in Consumer Regulations 1999. In addition I believe that your charges are a Penalty. Penalty charges are irrecoverable at common law. The precedent for this was Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v New Garage and Motor co Ltd [1915] AC 79, along with Murray v Leisure play [2005] EWCA Civ 963. It was held that a contractual party can only recover damages for an actual loss or liquidated losses. It is clear that your charges do not reflect any actual and or real loss.

The Office of Fair Trading has concluded that penalty charges are unfair under the Consumer Contract Regulations of 1999, coupled with case law dating back to 1914.

I am frankly shocked that you have operated my account in this way as I had always reposed confidence in your integrity and expertise as my fiduciary.

Also please note below an extract from an article taken from the Metro Paper 12th December 2006.

£30 overdraft fee costs £2.50

Banks are charging customers £30 in unauthorised overdraft 'service fees' when they cost just £2.50 to process, a TV documentary has revealed. Stephen Hone, founder of website penaltycharges.co.uk told BBC2's The Money Programme: 'The Banks have scammed people for years on these charges. They are unlawful.' Customers are now taking banks to the small claims court and in each case, the banks have settled. Financial Ombudsman Walter Merricks said he will stop accepting banks' offers to part-settle in these cases, saying they must do so in full or explain why the charges are legal. 'If not, I will investigate,' he added

Therefore I state my case that had I taken this to court I would have successfully claimed all charges and interest in relation to these charges.

Please find attached my acceptance form. Thank you for your time and I appreciate the prompt response to resolve this matter.

Yours Sincerely

Mr X Xxxxxxxxxxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
Administrators - Please move this case to won, £320 credited to my account!!!! what address do I send the cheque and who do I make it out to?

 

thanks again

 

Hi Thank you so much for offering a donation ,we will contact you shortly with the details your asking for

CONGRATULATIONS

When you want to fool the world, tell the truth. :D

Advice & opinions of Janet-M are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any

doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...