New strategy for Allocation Questionnaires

[funbint]

What a great explanation Gary, it must of been even I understood it

 

Not to leave out a superb time saving tool excellent draft, great work.

 

Really the only extra thing for the claiment would be coping of the statements, as the rest of the points could be managed from the POC in most cases.

 

Rgds

FB

[funbint]

After the AQ's have gone back, if/when the judge has agreed to the directions in the draft order you will then need to provide;

 

a) Your schedule;

 

b) Your statements showing the charges. Alternatively the list of charges which the bank provided under your S.A.R - (Subject Access Request);

 

c) A statement of evidence. See post *24 or my sig for a link to the one I used for my Lloyds claim. In most cases it'll need amending to suit, although I'm working on it to make it more broad-ranging.

 

d) All the statutues and decided cases on which your claim relies. Ie, UTCCR's, UCTA's, SOGA, case law, etc. For this, I'd just submit the whole of the http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/33060-basic-court-bundle.html.

 

Thanks again more brilliant help consider your scales tipped

 

Was just wondering.........

 

I know I would'nt have to send any info till asked by the judge but could I send it anyway along with AQ. Would this have any positive effect on the time scales or any other aspect.

 

RGDS

FB

[funbint]

No, definately don't do that. You should'nt pre-empt the judges order and besides, the AQ is only for the judge to decide on allocation. The issues regarding the legalities of the charges, etc are not relevant at that point.

 

Understood