Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Out of warranty phone repair? (Samsung Galaxy Note 9)


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 775 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Out of warranty and any repair would be a goodwill gesture I'm afraid.

 

To be fair over 3 years of use is pretty good for any mobile phone which is why I never pay top dollar for the latest model or buy a contract which includes the cost of a phone.

 

Buy sim only contracts and outright purchase of phones 1 or 2 generations old, just as good and less painful when they inevitably go wrong.

Edited by Homer67
typo
  • I agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Check out on line sellers such as Appliances Direct or Appliances On Line for new sim free mobile phones, other sellers may be better value and are available but that's who I've used in the past

Link to post
Share on other sites

@BankFodder I'm happy to be corrected but I thought after 3 years of use any defect corrected would be a gesture of goodwill or the manufacture would be leaving themselves open to a huge number of claims?

 

Also the OP states the warranty expired after 2 years, I'm not sure that's correct as most mobile phones only have a 12 month warranty on the device but the contract may have been 24 months which may have included an extra year's warranty.

Link to post
Share on other sites

@BankFodderI see what you mean. I think the expected life of any electronic device that uses firmware and software and has the ability to download and install other software is a lot less than 7 years, more like 3 years.

 

In my experience 3 years with any mobile phone or tablet  is a good innings but considering the cost, that seems poor value for money hence my advice to the OP going forward to buy older gen devices for a much lower price than they were on release.

Link to post
Share on other sites

@BankFodderpessimistic I grant you but realistic based on my experience which as a Telecoms Manager in the NHS I can advise that 3 years for one of our phones is unusual, they normally last around 24, plus up to another 6 months, which is why we only have 24 month contracts within our corporate contract with the supplier.

 

Samsung is Android (Android is owned by Google) and through Samsung they send out regular firmware upgrades free of charge. However, the user is not forced to install them and frequently they get missed which means the phone becomes problematic and has software and application issues.

 

There is no stated limit on the Google Android firmware updates being issued, but eventually your phone will be unable to accept the latest update due to limitations of its hardware and you get a message saying 'unable to install'. For example we still have some phones from 2016 and they still receive and accept the firmware updates, but they are few and far between now.

 

As you say we have no idea of the use the OP's device had or any other contributing factors such as software downloaded and applications installed.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...