Jump to content


Backdoor CCJ OPS/DCB(L) 2017 Windscreen PCN - got set aside - awaiting hearing date- Outside lines - Vantage point , brighton ***Claim Dismissed***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 804 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Well done on your victory!  👏

 

Yes, we'd love to hear the details when you get a minute.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

They did turn up but not very prepared. It wasn't the same person who had submitted their papers and sounded like he had just read the papers.  

The judge sounded on my side from the beginning.  The focus was on whether I had parked outside marked lines and whether there actually were lines. The judge said my picture showed no line or faint. 

He asked the claimant several times do you agree / accept there are faint markings there and the guy accepted based on what he could see as he has no other knowledge of the case

 The judge asked me some basic question.  Did u see a notice and where you able to stop and read it

Were there other cars  there ( to which he asked the claimant if they had been ticketed ) and if I had anything to add . To which I added about the COP signage and marking

The claimant tried to add case law which the judge rejected as wasn't in their WS.  The judge spent 75% of the time talking to the claimant and asked me those questions then came to the judgement that due to poor markings he was judging there was no case. 

I didn't have the opportunity to ask for compensation. 

 

Sorry probably too much info !

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

No that's useful, it indicates judge was questioning their WS and the  whole basis of their claim,  Their own pictures killed it for them.

 

 

 

 

 

  • Thanks 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • AndyOrch changed the title to Backdoor CCJ OPS/DCB(L) 2017 Windscreen PCN - got set aside - awaiting hearing date- Outside lines - Vantage point , brighton ***Claim Dismissed***
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...