Backdoor CCJ OPS/DCB(L) 2017 Windscreen PCN - got set aside - awaiting hearing date- Outside lines - Vantage point , brighton ***Claim Dismissed***

[dx100uk]

yep simply ref their PCN NUMBER or their ref number

 

please note my new address.

 

thank you.

 

dx

 

[dx100uk]

oh dear how silly

you'd moved and you informed them of it....then you did the same thing again, but didn't inform them...

 

i will expect the CCJ is for about £250 and the cost of a set aside, if had any real reason to do so, would be the same £255.

if the CCJ is now outside of 1 month, paying it won't remove it sadly, and a paid CCJ is just as bad as one thats not.

 

dx

 

 

[dx100uk]

£100 by consent.

£255 for a hearing.

 

[dx100uk]

they knew you were a mug from the day you sent that appeal.

you repeatedly called it a fine..

 

we need to counter that.

 

 

[dx100uk]

easy done

was there a date set for a future hearing?

[dx100uk]

On 01/07/2021 at 12:56, Rmg2020 said:

1. On 11/02/2017 I parked my vehicle at the ground floor level at Vantage Point Cark Park,
Brighton, in what looked like a pay and display area. I paid my parking ticket, enclosed to the
application, Please see Page 1 for evidence.

I parked in an area signposted as additional parking, it looked very messy , with lots of
dumped/ fly tipped rubbish everywhere. The bay markings were either very faint or non
existent, there were no markings to show no parking allowed. I parked in what looked like a
valid parking area , and so I paid. I was not trying to evade parking correctly, I was unaware
that I had parked in an unmarked bay.

2. I came back and found a car parking fine from One parking solution as I had supposedly
parked in an unmarked bay. I was very much confused by this as the marking was very faint.i
thought this was a mistake. I have recently visited the car Park which appears to be unclear
and faint markings as the day I parked my vehicle in the bay. I have enclosed evidence to this
application demonstrating the insufficient bay markings. please see page 2 for evidence .

3. I immediately contacted One parking solution as I genuinely believed this was a mistake. why
would I park somewhere and pay if it wasn't a proper space. I did not receive any response
from the Company.

4. Due to no response from One parking solution, I wrote a further email requesting evidence of
my liability. A copy of this email is enclosed to this application. One parking solution did not
respond to this letter. Please see page 3 for evidence

5. On 19/06/2017 I wrote a further email requesting evidence (a copy is enclosed), whereby I
was told the debt was transferred to ZZPS. I had never heard of ZZPS. However, upon a
google search, I believe it is a debt collection agency. One parking solution did not notify me
of the transfer of debt, nor was I provided with a notice of assignment. According to the Law
of Property Act 1925, I am entitled to be notified, however, One parking solution failed to do
so. Please see page 4 for evidence

6. On 23/06/2017 I received a letter from Wright Hassall Solicitors requesting collection of the
debt. I was confused as I was informed the debt was transferred to ZZPS then few days later I
was told it transferred again to Wright Hassall. I responded to Wright Hassall requesting
evidence of my liability as I still believed this was a mistake. Again, I did not receive a notice
of assignment, nor any evidence I had previously requested multiple times to demonstrate my
liability. Please see page 5 for evidence

7. In September 2020, I changed address, however since I did not hear from Wright Hassall for
over 3 years, I called One parking solution to notify them of my change of address, whereby
they informed me this debt was transferred to DCBL and they had forwarded my current
address to them. A copy of the email response from One parking solution is enclosed. Please
see page 6 for evidence .

8. I was not contacted by DCBL at this point. This matter has been transferred to over three
companies, and it is unlawful to not receive any notice of transfers.

9. I require the notice of assignments and the pre-action protocol letters from each creditor.

10. Additionally, it is noteworthy that the parking fine was obtained over 4 years ago, I believe the
Claimant has not acted promptly in obtaining a CCJ after a substantive amount of time has
elapsed.

11. I believe this is an abuse of process – the matter was transferred to over 4 companies; it
remains unclear who owns the debt. Moreover, the original fine was for £60.00, it is
unreasonable for a fine to accumulate to over £300.00 whereby each company have added
their own charges and fees yet failed to notify me of the notice of change to allow me to
dispute the matter. This is not in accordance with the overriding principle under Civil
Procedure Rules.

12. I also note the original fine was for £100 as issued by One Parking solution, when Wright
Hassall contacted me the amount had gone up to £208, and then DCBL £160. This confuses
me further.

13. I was not trying to evade parking correctly, I unknowingly parked in what One Parking
solution have called an unmarked bay , which I disagree with due to the state of the car park.
I have tried to communicate with them and the debt collection agencies I was aware of but
have had no response.

 

 

docs1.pdf

[dx100uk]

how did they manage to send you it as a PDF, have they got your email address?

[dx100uk]

plenty of websites listed in upload and by search engines

though its better to convert the whole pdf to JPG pages and redact that way.

most editing by PDF editors can be reversed.

[dx100uk]

yep 3 copies

 

1 to court 

1 to the sols

1 for your file

 

pers we normally don't recommend giving the fleecers your email/sig/phone as this allows then to file things 1min before any deadline removing your chance to counter their lies or fake paperwork

[dx100uk]

you need to reply.

simply states that if their client wishes to settle, then please inform the court you wish to remove the CCJ and meet my £255 costs for the set aside directly.

Otherwise you are hereby directed to removed my email address from your files totally and NOT to use it for any further purpose, this includes anything whatsoever to do with the impending set aside hearing should you not comply as i've stated above 

[dx100uk]

new hearing as your set aside was successful and the fleecers have refused to consent foc to you.

 

you should have had a n180DQ and poss an n157 too.

we need to see what the judge has ordered , be done WS/statement?

[dx100uk]

so witness/statement time.

 

 

[dx100uk]

God no you dont do that

 

a ws does not have to contain legalese at all. You are a LiP so its not expected to be that way

 

Dx

[dx100uk]

converted your docx to PDF and merged other PDF to one claimants WS above.

 

docx has all your pers details in file properties/info!

always use PDF.

 

no proof of annual contract payment since 2016 then!! to prove its still valid....

 

[dx100uk]

cant hurt you to be a day later to get it right

you are a LiP (Litigant in person) joe public against the system and have leeway. but dont take the ....

 

 

[dx100uk]

docx file of defendants ws converted to pdf

docx shows all your pers details. in file info/properties.

where you are referring in red to a differing page within your ws forget it..only makes the ws circular and confusing to a judge.

only ever point to your exhibits.

think the ws is rather disjointed too.

[dx100uk]

Looks like you are going to win by default then.

Telephone hearing? Have you informed the court of your correct numver etc etc

and dont forget to ask for costs like the set aside fee.etc

[dx100uk]

You are entitled to £90 i believe if you take time off work. But is this not a telephone/video hearing so that might now wash?

[dx100uk]

Open

[dx100uk]

Well done 

Did they turn up?

Did you win costs?

 

Generally.   Expand with more detail later so as to help others in the future please 

 

Dx