Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Confused


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1477 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I apologise in advance if I babble I am anxiety sufferer and struggling.

Can’t even get face to face with professional which for me heightens everything 

 

I hold loans to which my step dad is guarantor never missed payments etc but since covid I’ve struggled. To be Honest every payment for the last year has been a struggle but i made them and gained debt elsewhere

 

sorry realky struggling in how I explain 

my step dad is 70 severe COPD only has benefit as income and my guarantor apologise if don’t make sense 

 

i ll try.

Since covid for me was March I’m my mums dads and sons carer I heard the words it’s cancer I locked my parents down.

 

i heard the words that no one wants to hear and my anxiety and stress kicked in I was broken my mum has aggressive fast growing cancer. This is literally 1 week before full lock down

 

fast forward me not seeing my parents not even as a carer I could drop shopping off ring bell and leave that was hell

 

fast forward my mum has to go on hospital

I take her but have to leave at entrance she’s scared.

That was super hard and I wasn’t in a good place. Surgery day.

 

 

And then I get phone call surgery cancelled as covid test inconclusive

 

fast forward 4 days.

Test negative surgery goes ahead and I’ve no contact etc then late evening I get the call she’s covid postitive actually none of this is relevant  to what I’m asking im babbling I apologise 

 

I didn’t pay my loan last month I had

I decided to pay rent instead

 

They contacted me today whilst at my mums asking my dad to pay arrears

please bear in mind he’s Cronic COPD and shielding and mum has major surgery  and income is pension and DLA 

 

 can they chase him for my payment when I’m affecting personally and financially by covid

 

they want payment on 23 May

my only Income is benefits at this time.

 

I have 2 sons on the specturum and lost their DLA

Now it’s pip and I can’t have them chasing my parents for a payment they can’t make.

 

Again I apologise if I’m.

Rambling or don’t make sense I

can’t cope with adding extra pressure to my mum and dad

 

Thankyou for reading 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who is the loan with?

 

But to put your mind at ease, the simple answer is there is stuff all they can ultimately do

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...