Moriarty Law UAE debt claim

[GoldenGoose]

Hi 

As requested I have opened a new topic of a final demand from Moriarty Law for £69k, as yet not received anything further since 25th August.

 

Can you please advise the best course of action.

[AndyOrch]

Thread moved to the appropriate forum...please continue to post here to your thread.

 

Andy

[GoldenGoose]

Hi 

shall I post what I have from Moriarty Law as I have 2 final demands from back in August??

[AndyOrch]

Please do...redacted...this is your thread and a good place to store all the information safely from here on.....and create a time line of events.

[GoldenGoose]

hi Andyorch,

 

Do you think I need to respond to these as dx100 says I should have with the claim he is helping with??

[dx100uk]

had to remove your upload you've left ref no's and bar and Qcode boxes showing which can ID you.

 

although those letters were not a letter of claim with a response pack? or you've not received one prior and ignored

as they have issued a claim on the other debt that you got the same letter on

I would be replying using our std PAPLOC reply form as others have done.

[GoldenGoose]

Thanks for your help Dx as mentioned complete novice to this and really just need all the help you can offer.

will respond as you suggest 

cheers

[GoldenGoose]

Response letter for both with appropriate ref No.

 

All ok??

[dx100uk]

you dont need to respond to the one subject to the claimform now do you....think about it...

 

and that's not our pap reply form either

 

ive removed it as its a word doc

if you look in properties

all you pers details are there

which is not a good idea to give out on an Anon forum.

 

read upload use only pdf 

 

for ref post 5 here

 

 

[GoldenGoose]

Nope only responses going in post are CPR and 2 copies of the letter sent above which in future will PDF:) 

is that reply ok though or should I change to yours?

[dx100uk]

anything you post up here other than typing should be a PDF 

didn't say anything regarding your letter format posting outbound using royal mail.

 

your reply should be as detailed in that post 5.

 

dx

 

[GoldenGoose]

I will get tracking on all letters for proof.

[dx100uk]

not entirely sure what 'all letters of proof means'

 

for ref

ALL you need to do for the letter from moriality regard this £69k debt

is follow as post 5 in the link below.

 

 

 

[GoldenGoose]

For proof of postage!

[dx100uk]

blimey you've actually done research yourself...

I was expecting that to be your next baby steps question..

[GoldenGoose]

Slowly but surely just hang in there and I will get there eventually 

 

Shows we can all read things incorrectly

 

Please see both final demand letters attached, nothing since this.

 

each debt letter from moriarty.pdf

[dx100uk]

we don't mind people reading things incorrectly

that's how most DCA's get people to wet themselves and blindly cough up.

 

they think may/if/could/might/instructed means will.

 

so for the debt that is not subject to courtclaim form.

do as post 13.

 

dx

[GoldenGoose]

Sorry is the attached not good enough for letters not subject to court claim??

Response Letter.pdf

[dx100uk]

NO it is not a PAPLOC reply

and it is not USING THE REPLY FORM.

 

goto this link

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/406231-the-pre-action-protocol-for-debt-claims-is-made-by-the-master-of-the-rolls-as-head-of-civil-justice-1st-oct-2017/

and goto post 5

download the reply from THERE

fill it in as advised in POST 5 text.

 

 

[GoldenGoose]

So the form is just a print off and fill in as the top of the form says they have 30 days to fill in and reply or are we providing them the form they should have sent me??

What is me recommended response for dispute?

God you must be loving me!!!

[dx100uk]

fill it in exactly as advise in the text of post 5 there

there is no additional reason so far here ...just use the default there already .

 

it doesn't say anything about them having to fill anything in

just they have a 30days period to respond

however in this case I suspect that's pretty immaterial.