Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

CCA reply from LINK for a CO-OP credit card debt


Gator
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1695 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Have being as advised to move these details of my CO-OP credit card debt to this forum

 

The CO-OP debt is now with LINK and below are the details to date.

 

CO-OP (C/Card) £3,330

Have a default notice from CO-OP dated 11 May 2011
DMP  cancelled with Stepchange
June 2019

CCA sent to Link on 13/5/2019

 

NEW Update: 4th Oct 2019

Link have eventually sent a reply dated the 26/9/19 to my CCA request from 13/5/19, which supplied documentation in the form of a photocopy of the CO-OP Credit agreement plus a letter saying that therefore the account is enforceable.

 

Also enclosed was an account summary stating that a current balance of £3305.35 is outstanding, payable immediately and for me to contact them to arrange a payment?

 

I have checked various credit reports on Experian/Equifax/TransUnion

(i.e. Experian/Clearscore/Credit Karma) and no CO-OP amounts or account show, only that of a LINK entry showing a default on the 31st Oct 2013 and on further investigation it shows that the CO-OP account was marked as settled on the 5th Sept 2013 on Experian, with an open LINK account on TransUnion showing a default of £3459 dated 31st Oct 2013 and Equifax showing the LINK account closed with a balance of £3459? As the 6 year mark is fast approaching, these entries should I believe disappear with regard to all the LINK entries.

 

LINK as mentioned are requesting I get in contact and arrange to pay them the £3305.35 amount owed to them, but as the debt was incurred with the CO-OP back in February 1999 and the CO-OP have since marked as settled.

 

Is it possible that LINK can claim ownership of this debt, which they had taken over from the CO-OP and was then defaulted by LINK back in 2013?


As the original agreement I signed was with the CO-OP not LINK

Do LINK have any case to enforce?....and also what is the best action I should take?

To assist with advice I have also uploaded the documentation recently sent from LINK.

LINK_COOP_CCA_reply.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

that's an application form devoid of most of the reqiured prescribed terms

and also no T&C's

 

bogroll.

 

as for the credit file as explained before

when an ON sells a debt on they will mark it as £0 settled and default you, issuing a defauly notice

 

either the debt buyer will add their own entry [as in this case] or takeover the original entry.

 

either way they cant change the defaulted date.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Thanks for your quick reply!

 

As you stated this application form that they have returned from  my CCA is worthless?

Question is could it possibly be used in any way to enforce the debt?

 

Plus yes they have certainly changed the default date, adding on over 2 years, but as six years expires this month, does that have any impact?

 

Finally should I now do anything, or just wait and see?

 

All help appreciated

 

Regards

Gator

Link to post
Share on other sites

let it run.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...