Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Brachers LLP Help - Corporate Amex Debt


TF-Destroyer
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1756 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

 

I need help dealing with Brachers LLP regarding a Corporate Amex Debt.

 

With regards to debt on a corporate card, long story short

- I work as a travelling consultant during the week,

 

I was based on a client for 6 months paying my expenses within the rules on my corporate amex card...

after my 2nd month, my manager refused to sign off on my travel expenses,

 

i took the matter with HR who said the manager was the budget owner for that project and it was her choice.

In order to keep my job, i still showed up on client site and did my work as I was new to the company.

 

Eventually £7.5k was racked up on my corporate card, Amex came chasing and essentially I was brought into a disciplinary meeting where I was told off on record that I would be sacked if I didnt take ownership of the debt...This in itself had a whole legal chase behind it, however would still have ended with me losing my job...and I like my job so I gave in to the corporate machine and their legal poweress.

 

now that I have taken on this debt, I agreed to pay £200 a month to Brachers,

I stuck with this for a few months, then I split from my ex and moved to london where my expenses increased to £860 p/m.

 

I have now missed the last two payments on my debt to Amex, because I couldnt afford it after restarting in London.

As of this week, I have said to Brachers that I can afford £100 p/m for the next two months and then I will increase my repayment to the £250 mark if not higher depending on circumstances. Reason for this, is that I am getting a significant salary increase in November, so will be affordable.

 

However they wrote back and said that £100 was unacceptable and that they will now proceed with legal action to recover the debt owed along with all legal costs and expenses.

 

Any advice on how I should appraoch this, is there anything I can do to protect myself from this crap?

I will make it absolutely cleared I am more than willing to pay off this debt,

however I do not want to put myself in a position that I am struggling to make ends meet by repaying more than I can afford.

 

Any help and/or advice would be massively appreciated :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

who are their stated client Amex?

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...