Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

what should i do next *** WON ***


mbdiss
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6297 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Letter looks okay, but if you want to go for contractual rate you should add that now. It's up to you though, if you go for contractual rate you will probably (from my readings) end up in court although the initial cases show that the court is awarding it.

 

If you don't add some interest at the initial stages and the bank settles before court, you won't get any interest at any rate.

 

Don't forget that you only get the stat. 8% if it goes to court.

 

So you can see the pro's and con's? I would suggest a quick forum search on 'contractual rate' because there a some interesting discussions and cases around.

 

I've only figured this lot out from reading the various arguments around the site, if anyone believes the situation to differ from my opinion please feel free to clarify....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 136
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

ok i have change this part of my LBA letter. Do i need to state the interest or will this do??

 

 

 

I calculate that you have taken £3178 plus interest that you have charged me in exceeding overdraft limits, unpaid D/D’s, card misuse.

Additionally you have entered a default notice against my credit record. This default occurred merely in respect of unlawful charges levied by you or was the result of impecuniosity’s caused directly by the taking by you of penalty charges which you had applied unlawfully to my account.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would say something like '..you have taken £3178 plus interest of £xxxx calculated at your published contractual rate of xx% for authorised/unauthorised (delete as appropriate sorta thing) borrowing, etc etc'.

 

Then with your letter send the entire spreadsheet including the interest column.

 

I hope one of the people who have been discussing contractual rate will have a read of this though, to make sure I haven't misinterpreted what I've read elsewhere, but this is the way I will be doing it for the next stage in my actions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well LBA letter when out today, so RBS should have it by 10am tomorrow. So guess I need to start sorting out my claim form soon? Don’t think I will get anything from RBS before the end of the year, as the dead line is The 27th December, so I’m going to give them till 8th January and say happy New Year to them by filing my claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi just a bit of an update.

I got this letter today. I think the banks our feeling to pressure now.:D :D

Thank you for your patience while I have been investigating your complaint about your charges for the last six years. I passed the case on to our customer relations unit when I received your letter on the 21/11/2006 (this was my rejection letter) and on receiving your letter today (the LBA letter) I have contacted them again. (This is the best bit of the letter) They normally contact customers within 10 working days but due to media coverage there has been an increase in cases (I would never have guessed that:p ) and therefore unfortunately it is taking a litter longer than normal. I have enclosed a leaflet that gives the address for the customer relations unit so that you can write to them directly.

 

That may be so but they still only have 14 day to deal with it. RBS recieved this letter on the 07/12/2006

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't bother reminding them, but if ts been escalated to CR you might like to drop Tommy.Mclean@rbs.co.uk a little hello...didn't do me much good in the end (they doubled the branch offer) but my claim is quite large....

 

TMcL has been known to sort out claims for other lucky customers quite rapidly, but as I understand it they are a little 'behind' right now...you may reach your deadline before your file reaches the top of the pile in CR.

 

That's what happened in my case so I gave them a few more days as goodwill gesture...in the end they took 5 days to get me a letter just about doubling the branch offer. I emailed TMcL again at this point and said I wouldn't accept less than a higher figure than their offer to which I have had no reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi hydra thanks for the reply. I guess it can’t hurt for me to send Tommy an email to see if he his feeling stressed with all the extra work he has and just before Christmas when people want to take it easy:D :D . Oh well they only have them self’s to blame I guess. Plus I guess it will only help to show that I have tried to sort this matter out before going to court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Final got round to watching the money program on the banks last night. Was just wondering if we could use in court what the guy from trading standards said in the program about the banks

Link to post
Share on other sites

This thread http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/34887-5-money-claim-line.html contains everything you need to know about POC with MCOL, use this http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/681-4-particulars-claim-n1.html if you are filing paper N1 (this is where most of my source came from)

 

About the only thing you need to send with the N1 (apart from the court fee) is your schedule of charges.

 

I will be filing my paper N1's today using the text below.

 

In the - Truro County Court

 

Mr Hydra

ADDRESS CLAIMANT

 

-vs-

 

RBS PLC

BRANCH

ADDRESS DEFENDANT

 

Brief Details of Claim (not that brief I concede)

The Claimant has an account 1220xxxx ("the Account") with the Defendant which was opened in or around August 1989.

 

During the period in which the Account has been operating the Defendant debited numerous charges to the Account in respect of purported breaches of contract on the part of the Claimant.

 

The Claimant contends that such charges are levied as penalties for purported breaches of contract and as such are unenforceable by virtue of common law, the Unfair Contracts Terms Act 1977 and the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999

 

The claimant intends to pursue the return of monies taken in the for of unfair charges by the Defendant.

 

 

Particulars of Claim

 

1. The Claimant has an account 1220xxxx ("the Account") with the Defendant which was opened in or around August 1989.

2. During the period in which the Account has been operating the Defendant debited numerous charges to the Account in respect of purported breaches of contract on the part of the Claimant and also charged interest on the charges once applied. The Claimant understands that the Defendant contends that the charges were debited in

accordance with the terms of the contract between itself and the Claimant.

3. A list of the charges applied is attached to these particulars of claim.

4. The Claimant contends that:

a) The charges debited to the Account are punitive in nature; are not a genuine pre-estimate of cost incurred by the Defendant; exceed any alleged actual loss to the Defendant in respect of any breaches of contract on the part of the Claimant; and are not intended to represent or relate to any alleged actual loss, but instead unduly enrich the Defendant which exercises the contractual term in respect of such charges with a view to profit.

b) The contractual provision that permits the Defendant to levy such charges is unenforceable by virtue of common law, under the Unfair Contracts Terms Act 1977 s4 and under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 para 8 and sch2(1)(e)..

5. Accordingly the Claimant claims:

a) the return of the amounts debited in respect of charges in the sum of £8261.00

b) Court costs;

c) Interest pursuant to section 69 County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per year from 11th January 2000 to 12th December 2006, as set out on the attached list of charges, also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgement or earlier payment at a daily rate of £1.81.

 

Statement of Truth etc etc.....

 

I'll let you know later if it all goes okay.

 

Best of luck

 

Phil

 

(Don't forget to click my scales if I've helped at all - :D )

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sure here it is http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/royal-bank-scotland-bank/28596-hydra-rbs.html although most of the interesting and useful stuff happens in other peoples threads ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The value of the claim relates to the track it is allocated to...under £5k is small claims, £5-10k is fast-track and above that is multi-track.

 

The principle differences as far as I can see is the cost and that certain extra information can be demanded if you aren't small-claims (cpr part 18 request forexample, only applies off small-claims track, but as Cobblers seem to be sending them out anyway, it probably won't make that much different on the legal side.)

 

HOWEVER - I am not a legal head and everything I am doing is driven by what I read here, so there are probably several legal implications to 'fast-track' that I haven't yet considered.

 

Please click my scales if anything I say is helpful!

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Much the same as Hydra, all I know is from reading these forums.....if I remember rightly if you lose a small claims case, you don't owe anything to anyone whereas a larger claim you would.

 

If it is for two accounts and both are under £5k, probably best to do that and do a seperate claim for each account. If you need to split it further, one claim for each 3 year period?

 

Good luck!

If my post has been useful, tip my scales and let me know

 

Always start with the User guide!

Stuck with RBS charges? Click here!!

 

RBS CA1 £2794 SETTLED!!! RBS CA2 £503 SETTLED!!! HBOS CC £498 SETTLED!!! Barclaycard £705 (with CCI) ONGOING!!! NATWEST CA ONGOING!!! LLOYDS CA x 2, CC, LOAN ONGOING!!! HFC LOAN ONGOING!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok just sorting out my N1 claim form for the court could someone please have a look through this and tell me if this is ok and also is the daily rate that i have put right?

 

In the – Preston County Court

mbdiss

ADDRESS CLAIMANT

-Vs-

RBS PLC

BRANCH

ADDRESS DEFENDANT

Brief Details of Claim (

The Claimant had an account *** ("the Account") with the Defendant which was opened in or around April 2003 and closed around August 2006.

During the period in which the Account has been operating the Defendant debited numerous charges to the Account in respect of purported breaches of contract on the part of the Claimant.

The Claimant contends that such charges are levied as penalties for purported breaches of contract and as such are unenforceable by virtue of common law, the Unfair Contracts Terms Act 1977 and the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999

The claimant intends to pursue the return of monies taken in the for of unfair charges by the Defendant.

 

Particulars of Claim

1. The Claimant had an account ("the Account") with the Defendant, which was opened around April 2003 and closed around August 2006.

2. During the period in which the Account has been operating the Defendant debited numerous charges to the Account in respect of purported breaches of contract on the part of the Claimant and also charged interest on the charges once applied. The Claimant understands that the Defendant contends that the charges were debited in

Accordance with the terms of the contract between the Defendant and the Claimant.

3. A list of the charges applied is attached to these particulars of claim.

4. The Claimant contends that:

a) The charges debited to the Account are punitive in nature; are not a genuine pre-estimate of cost incurred by the Defendant; exceed any alleged actual loss to the Defendant in respect of any breaches of contract on the part of the Claimant; and are not intended to represent or relate to any alleged actual loss, but instead unduly enrich the Defendant which exercises the contractual term in respect of such charges with a view to profit.

b) The contractual provision that permits the Defendant to levy such charges is unenforceable by virtue of common law, under the Unfair Contracts Terms Act 1977 s4 and under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 Para 8 and sch2 (1)(e).

5. Accordingly the Claimant claims:

a) The return of the amounts debited in respect of charges in the sum of £***** plus interest as set out in D

b) Court costs £*****

c) Data protction request £10

D) Interest pursuant to section 69 County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per year from 10th June 2003 to 30th June 2006, as set out on the attached list of charges, also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgement or earlier payment at a daily rate of £0.72.

Statement of Truth etc etc.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems fairly similar to mine...is this for MCOL or paper N1?

 

In my thread...

 

I would shorten the 'brief details' also to 'the claimant intends to pursue the return of monies taken in the form of unfair charges by the Defendant'

 

Something like that anyway:)

 

BUT I misunderstood what she said. I shortened it as much as I could while retaining the gist of my case THEN added the comment. Now I see she meant that I should shorten my brief to ONLY the comment. DUH!

 

Filed my N1's just before Christmas and haven't received anything back from court as yet so can't advise you if there are any issues with not being 'brief' enough...

 

That said, the court clerk commented that it all looked in order.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...