Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Prodial fined £350,000 for more than 46 million spam PPI calls


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2993 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

The largest-ever fine for cold-calling has been handed down by the Information Commissioner's Office.

 

 

Brighton-based company Prodial was fined £350,000 for generating more than 46 million spam calls.

 

 

More than 1,000 people complained to the ICO about the automated message calls they had received from the company, which related to PPI claims.

 

 

Information Commissioner Christopher Graham said:

"This is one of the worst cases of cold calling we have ever come across.

 

 

"The volume of calls made in just a few months was staggering.

 

 

"This was a company that knew it was breaking the law.

 

 

"A company director admitted that once the ICO became involved, the company shut down.

 

 

"That stopped the calls, but we want to send a clear message to other firms that this type of law-breaking will not pay.

 

 

"That is why we have handed out our highest ever fine."

 

 

https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/company-fined-350k-46-million-155618593.html

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

But if the company closed, (obviously to get around having to pay what they knew was coming), What assets are there to get the money from. Typical of a lot of todays businesses wrack up debts or break the law and then dissolve the business so they can stick a middle finger up to everyone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a call nearly an hour ago by these sp4mmers they are now using fake numbers to get past the TPS so what next? The number was 020 7946 0693

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

00800088273677

 

 

002081551095

 

 

they now use 00 at the front

or as you've seen a short STD number

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I got most of the call recorded but not the 1st part the company name.

 

I have already heard back from the TPS they have confirmed it was a fake number. So nothing I can do except putting a shortcut on my phones front page to be able to record before answering it...

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...
But if the company closed, (obviously to get around having to pay what they knew was coming), What assets are there to get the money from. Typical of a lot of todays businesses wrack up debts or break the law and then dissolve the business so they can stick a middle finger up to everyone.
I was just thinking about this the other day, and wondered if company directors ever get prosecuted for trading whilst insolvent. I've certainly never heard of any who have.

In theory, there must be a huge number of insolvent companies which continue trading. Some are doing so because their directors are genuinely hoping for a turn around in fortunes, better times etc, but some directors just don't care, because they know they can recklessly run up debts, and can just pull the plug and call in the receivers when it all gets too much.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent news! About time these companies were brought to heel!

 

Sad to see that, as I type this reply I am looking at two adverts, on this forum, promoting PPI companies. There does seem to be a little element of hypocrisy here!

 

Methinks the forum doth protest too hard.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent news! About time these companies were brought to heel!

 

Sad to see that, as I type this reply I am looking at two adverts, on this forum, promoting PPI companies. There does seem to be a little element of hypocrisy here!

 

Methinks the forum doth protest too hard.....

 

We have been through this advertising problem many many times Andrew and the site has no control on what is shown, they are displayed according to what is in your browser.

To prove that point, open a tag and go to PC World and then see what is in the ads.

Link to post
Share on other sites

already explained this Andrew in your previous 5 posts you've had over the last 4yrs.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...