Jump to content


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3306 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Ad

 

A promotion on Glamour Heaven's Facebook page stated "MASSIVE ANNIVERSARY GIVEAWAY … WE ARE GIVING AWAY THIS STUNNING MINI COOPER. FOR A CHANCE TO WIN SIMPLY SHARE THIS PHOTO AND LIKE OUR PAGE".

 

Issue

 

The complainant challenged whether the promotion was genuine.

 

CAP Code (Edition 12)

 

3.18.18.2

Response

 

Glamour Heaven did not respond to the ASA's enquiries.

 

Assessment

 

Upheld

The ASA was concerned by lack of substantive response and apparent disregard for the Code from Glamour Heaven, which was a breach of CAP Code rule 1.7 (Unreasonable delay). We reminded them of their responsibility to provide a substantive response to our enquiries and told them to do so in future.

We had not seen any evidence that that prize was genuine or that it had been awarded to an entrant, we therefore concluded it was misleading.

The ad breached CAP Code (Edition 12) rules 3.1 (Misleading advertising), 8.1 and 8.2 (Sales promotions).

 

Action

 

The ad must not appear again in its current form. We told Glamour Heaven to ensure their promotions were genuine. We referred the matter to CAP's Compliance team.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...