Jump to content


Claimform lowells/BW - old 3 mobile 'debt'


geee
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3417 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Is it 28 working days?

 

I just logged on and got the below info.

 

Claim History

Your acknowledgment of service was received on 24/09/2014 at 16:00:39

Your defence was submitted on 07/10/2014 at 23:14:29

Your defence was received on 08/10/2014 at 08:01:04

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Contact the court and find out

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

. I think its automatically stayed and they can apply to lift the stay and proceed at any stage . Mine did a few months later.

Dec 2006 SARS request :p

 

5th Feb 2007 initial request inc list of charges totalling £1706.50 without 8% interest :o

 

15th Feb 2007"bog off " letter received.:(

 

19th Feb 2007 LBA sent with further copy of charges:|

 

4th April £750 goodwill gesture paid into bank

 

11th Aug 2007-another £704 charges since and lloyds served me with enforcement notoice

Link to post
Share on other sites

so can I apply for a discontinuation?

 

The claimant doesn't have to respond to the Defence unless you also filed a counterclaim.

 

 

If you have defended and it is a small claim (under £10k) the court will expect you to try mediation.

 

 

So you should receive an allocation questionaire from the court.

 

 

This helps the judge decide what steps need to be taken to trial.

 

 

You will also be asked if you want to try mediation at this point.

 

 

If you have not heard from the court soon,

give them a call to find out when you are likely to hear.

 

So the short answer is that an application to discontinue at this stage is unlikely to succeed.

 

 

If you think that the claim has absolutely no basis and can be dealt with very quickly,

you could apply to strike it out or get summary judgment.

If you were to succeed the claim would end.

 

 

But both applications will incur a fee (unless you are on benefits and entitled to a reduction in the fee).

 

If you agree that you owe something then mediation is a quick way to reaching an agreement on how much that 'something' should be.

 

Hope my ramblings help a little...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah...

I was getting no response on that thread regards them not responding, so started a thread about no response then today they responded :-(

 

no worries. usually best to stick to one thread though re same matter.

threads will prob get 'merged' just now

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then let them continue...you do nothing yet......they have to overcome the fact that what they have claimed is statute barred.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Threads merged.Please do not start new threads on the same matter.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Geee in response to your PM.

 

Your offer was made without prejudice therefore forms no part of the court claim and the fact that they did respond on the 28th day to your defence has no significance apart from the claimant avoiding further costs to lift the stay.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Geee in response to your PM.

 

Your offer was made without prejudice therefore forms no part of the court claim and the fact that they did respond on the 28th day to your defence has no significance apart from the claimant avoiding further costs to lift the on stay.

 

Regards

 

Andy

 

Thanks Andy

I've been reading up on SB and they can't do anything about it now as the last payment was in 2007, if I read it right?

It also says they should not be perusing the debt once I've wrote to them telling then I won't be paying as the debt is SB??

What will the judge do now? Grant them a day in court or read my defence?

I've not supplied any evidence of not paying since 2007!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The court does nothing until the claimant informs the court they wish to proceed and that will be confirmed if and when you receive a Directions Questionnaire (DQ).

this allocates the claim to its track and transfers the claim to your local county court to proceed.

 

Once allocated you/they will be allowed to submit a Witness Statement in support of your defence and both will be expected to disclose evidence in support of the claim/defence...so a lot to happen before any judge actually views your defence...assuming it gets that far and they dont withdraw in the meantime.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

So them sending me this letter saying they intend to continue with the claim doesn't mean anything will happen?

 

Am I right in thinking this has started the SB clock ticking again as it's an "action"?

 

Can I apply for it to be stayed or set as side as they should not of proceeded to pursue this debt once I'd stated it was SB?

 

Sorry for all the questions

Link to post
Share on other sites

calm down

 

 

the claim is stayed inc the SB clock still

but if it had already ticked passed 6yrs they're stuffed already

 

 

you await their next move.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The court does nothing until the claimant informs the court they wish to proceed and that will be confirmed if and when you receive a Directions Questionnaire (DQ).

this allocates the claim to its track and transfers the claim to your local county court to proceed.

 

Once allocated you/they will be allowed to submit a Witness Statement in support of your defence and both will be expected to disclose evidence in support of the claim/defence...so a lot to happen before any judge actually views your defence...assuming it gets that far and they don't withdraw in the meantime.

 

They have written to me saying their "client intends to continue with the claim"

Is that the same thing?

 

I also emailed them and told them they had my old address and that my redirection will end soon so their mail wont reach me unless they change it. I supplied the new address and got the reply below:-

 

Thank you for your email, the contents of which have been noted.

 

 

 

Unfortunately due to the Data Protection Act we are unable to discuss any information pertaining to the reference quoted without first completing Data Protection verification.

 

 

 

We would therefore appreciate it if you could contact our offices on the below number in order to complete Data Protection verification enquiries which will allow us to correspond via email in future.

 

 

 

Once we have confirmed Data Protection verifications, we will then be able to update your address accordingly. If you are not able to call us, we are able to accept a signed letter confirming your new address.

 

Are they trying to trick me in to phoning or sending my signature?

Link to post
Share on other sites

if they notify the court that will be continuing, then yes it will proceed to the next stage of DQ, unless anything changes in the meantime. could check with the court to see if they have contacted them accordingly.

re email, that seems to be a usual data protection response to check id if they do not have any prior confirmed details of current/new email address, before responding via email.

Link to post
Share on other sites

what address did you send the CRP from?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...