Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

LLoyds 'Cardholder Protection Plan'?


Guest
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2526 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi

 

quick q, urgent

 

is the Sentinel Gold (loyds) cr card cover included in this current redress scheme that deadlines on sat?

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 83
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

ps, not sure if it was actually under Sentinel (presume it was as loyds seemed to use them), old statements just say 'cardholder protection plan' £x.xx, and is mthly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

CPP and these high street banks and credit card issuers have agreed to be part of the scheme:

 

  • Bank of Scotland
  • Barclays
  • Canada Square Operations Limited (formerly Egg)
  • Capital One
  • Clydesdale Bank
  • Home Retail Group Insurance Services Limited
  • HSBC
  • MBNA
  • Morgan Stanley Bank
  • Nationwide
  • Santander
  • The Royal Bank of Scotland
  • Tesco

Lloyds TSB is not on the list because it says it didn't sell CPP.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi, thanks for reply.

 

been searching around,

seems sentinel gold is not part of this current scheme.

and, seems that 'cardholder protection plan' was re a PPI?

Link to post
Share on other sites

cardholder protection plan was ppi

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if I remember correctly the monthly cost was 79p per £100

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sent gold was another scheme like CPP was

 

 

yet to be attacked by anyone I think

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

cardholder protection plan was ppi

 

cheers :)

 

will look into a claim on that, if its not out of time to claim!

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?427646-CPP-reclaim-deadline-31st-Augusst

 

Ford, did you not read the August newsletter ? You only have until 31 August to make your claim.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

if I remember correctly the monthly cost was 79p per £100

 

 

spot on :)

bal was around a grand, payment was around 7£

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?427646-CPP-reclaim-deadline-31st-Augusst

 

Ford, did you not read the August newsletter ? You only have until 31 August to make your claim.

 

hi

have only just been given some stuff to look at.

anyway, turns out (as above) 'cardholder protection plan' is re card ppi not cpp.

plus, it seems loyds didnt use the company cpp, they use/d sentinel. sentinel/loyds is not under the current redress, but such ins may or may not be under investigation, fca apparently wont confirm either way. (mse site)

 

wld it still be poss to claim re this card ppi, as last statement have so far atm is '04?

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

wld it still be poss to claim re this card ppi, as last statement have so far atm is '04?

Yes of course, SAR to Lloyd's?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes of course, SAR to Lloyd's?

 

 

cheers. i think that the card was paid off and closed '05/06 (yet tbc). wld it still be in time to claim, is it 12 yrs time limit?

Link to post
Share on other sites

there is no time limit on PPI

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

there is no time limit on PPI

 

 

dx

 

cheers. (i thought so, but remembered seeing something about 12 yrs on mse site)

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you go start a thread in the PPI forum

 

 

i'll moved your posts for you ford.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you go start a thread in the PPI forum

 

 

i'll moved your posts for you ford.

 

 

dx

 

hi

this is re someone else. am awaiting more info, and will need to ask them first if can do a thread on it.

initially thought it was re cpp hence the posts on yr thread given saturdays deadline. soz to hijack your thread!

can move my existing posts if you wish?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

(a thread/posts move to here)

 

re loyds credit card;

 

is 'Cardholder Protection Plan' re CPP (and subject to the current redress scheme), Sentinel Gold (similar to cpp), or PPI?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Give it a google Ford, there's stacks of stuff about it.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Give it a google Ford, there's stacks of stuff about it.

 

hi

have done, and it seems that it is re ppi. see the thread link #3.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The current redress scheme is for the company to which the lenders/banks farmed out the CPP plans.

 

Sadly the deadline for lodging a complaint is tomorrow (Saturday 30/8/14).

 

CPP should have written to all of their customers about this.

 

If no such letter has been received from CPP then it may well be that the bank were providing this off their own back (which could be likely given that Lloyds have their own insurance arm).

 

If that is the case then if this is a mis-sell then the bank should be approached directly rather than via the CPP scheme.

 

If the benefits offered by their CPP equivalent scheme were doubled up i.e. that the general terms of the card covered you for something for which they covered you again for an extra fee then I would suggest that this is misleading and is a mis-sell.

 

Any chance that you have you have the general T&Cs for the card? If so I would compare those to the ones with this policy to see if things were doubled up.

 

Bear in mind that Lloyds were probably the biggest sinner in terms of mis-selling PPI so it begs the question "How many more of their products have been mis-sold"?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

posts moved over

 

 

card protection scheme was Lloyds version of PPI

 

 

the sentinel gold thing on the card too

is another type of CPP

but as yet I've seen no reclaims surrounding this

though there is a few posts on MSE

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...