Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Is "111" an embarassment to the NHS?


Surfer01
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3559 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My father has had two bad falls recently and with the last one early Tuesday morning they wanted to take him to hospital, but he refused. This morning he phoned us very early stating that he was in a lot of pain and could not get out of bed. When my wife saw him yesterday he seem to be a bit battered and bruised. He does not live in the same town as us.

Rather than phone 999 I decided to phone 111 and got put through to an operator who took down all the details. She then said she would put me through to a nurse? Anyway after hanging on for awhile I was put through to a nurse who proceeded to ask me all the questions I had answered previously. I repeat the incidents of the falls and explain what had happened. I was asked some more questions like can he get out of bed which I had already answered to the same person.

Strangely they asked me why we could not go around to attend to him and then phone from there. I am disabled and cannot get up the stairs and also have no medical knowledge. They then asked me if he has had any falls and unfortunately at that point I lost it as I had already been on the phone 20 minutes and was going nowhere.

I put the phone down after thanking them for not being able to help. I then phoned "999" and they were very prompt. They later phoned us to advise that due to irregular heartbeat they had to rush him to hospital for checks etc. Thank goodness one service is working okay.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wanted a doctor at 3am, phoned 111. After an age on the phone they insisted on sending an ambulance who arrived very promptly. The ambulance crew spent about half an hour with me before deciding I didn't need to go to hospital but did need extra pain relief which could only be prescribed by a doctor, so they sent for the doctor who eventually arrived about three hours after my original call.

 

My GP has now given me two doses of the stronger meds to use at my discretion rather than be in so much pain for so long whilst waiting for the doctor I'd asked for in the first place. It's as if the people setting up and running this service err on the side of 'patients know nothing about their own conditions and are unable to judge when they need medical help' rather than listening to the person who actually knows best what is happening. The vast majority do not abuse the 999 service nor accident and emergency, but it seems that there is an implicit assumption that the majority will abuse them unless they are prevented from doing so - a bit like the assumption that everyone on benefits is there by choice rather than necessity.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
I wanted a doctor at 3am, phoned 111. After an age on the phone they insisted on sending an ambulance who arrived very promptly. The ambulance crew spent about half an hour with me before deciding I didn't need to go to hospital but did need extra pain relief which could only be prescribed by a doctor, so they sent for the doctor who eventually arrived about three hours after my original call.

 

My GP has now given me two doses of the stronger meds to use at my discretion rather than be in so much pain for so long whilst waiting for the doctor I'd asked for in the first place. It's as if the people setting up and running this service err on the side of 'patients know nothing about their own conditions and are unable to judge when they need medical help' rather than listening to the person who actually knows best what is happening. The vast majority do not abuse the 999 service nor accident and emergency, but it seems that there is an implicit assumption that the majority will abuse them unless they are prevented from doing so - a bit like the assumption that everyone on benefits is there by choice rather than necessity.

 

 

we all would like to think that these experiences are rare but as time passes their has been too many complaints of untrained call centre staff trying to make clinical decisions on the phone

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Our recent experience of the 111 'service' has left me in little doubt as to it's ineffectiveness.

 

My 83 year old father was staying with my sister as mum was in hospital following surgery and I was at my live in job caring for an elderly person with dementia so could not help. Dad became unwell displaying strange behaviour including falls, not being able to walk from his bedroom to the bathroom, not being able to follow simple, clear instructions, confusion and talking oddly. Sister rang me for advice and I said get a GP house call for him as could be a UTI or chest infection, he is frail so not able to get to walk in centre, and sister was home with 3 young children and him.

 

She rang 111, spoke to a nurse and was told a GP would attend within 2 hours. An hour and a half later a GP rang saying he understood she wanted an appointment to attend he local walk in centre; so, she repeats no and why she feels he deserved a home is it, that the nurse earlier had agreed it was appropriate in the circumstances and that she couldn't get him there. In the end he backed down and said they'd put him on the visit list and someone 'should' be out within the next 2 hours - no acknowledgement that they'd already been waiting almost 2 hours by this time.

 

Another hour plus passed and another phone call from a different GP - basically the other guy had just put dad at the end of the list of people to be called with the intention of them persuading patients to rock up at the OOH surgery in a town a twenty minute drive away!! This GP was horrified that she was the 3rd person from 111 they had spoken to and that, by this time it was well over 3 1/2 hours since my sister had rung 111 to request a call out, dad was most definitely poorly and no-one was doing anything. The lovely GP arranged to come out herself as she said dad should have been a priority for a house call let alone wait 2 hours to be seen.

 

She arrived within 3/4 hour of ringing them - remember she was based around 20 minutes drive away, had to find their house and do whatever before leaving the OOH surgery. She diagnosed a UTI with possible start of retention, gave not only a prescription but had brought a course of appropriate antibiotics with her so he had he first dose given by her! She arranged toting them back in the morning (herself) to check on him and advised that, if he didn't pass urine in the following 8 hours then he was to be taken to A&E by ambulance.

 

Thankfully he was much improved after my sister pushed fluids with him overnight and with antibiotics started. Suffice to say though, I wouldn't be trusting NHS111 service with my dad's care in future and my first port of call would be A&E with him!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...