Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Natwest Gold Visa & Mastercard PPI Complaint


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3391 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have now eventually received SAR details from NatWest but they cannot obtain a copy of the original agreement or any statements between November 1998 to October 2001 (due to inactivity on the account) as closed in June 2008.

 

Is this correct or should I be pushing for them to attempt location from their archives ?

 

I do have most of the statements from April 1999 to October 2001, its just that I was hopefully trying to locate any that I did not have.

 

Also when submitting complaint, shall I enclose any copies of statements that they do not have ? Do I also use the compound interest calculator and if so is the end date, last ppi payment or today ?

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no harm in pushing them for further data.

 

However, you mention inactivity on the account from November 1998 to October 2001 and if there was a nil balance during that period then there would (should) not have been any PPI applied for that period.

 

You don't need to submit copy statements at the preliminary stage of your complaint. If they claim not have data for a period where you do indeed have statements then you can submit them then.

 

As regards which spreadsheet to use, are there sizeable gaps in the statements you have or just small gaps here and there?

 

The Compound Interest spreadsheet will need further work on it as it is generally not appropriate for PPI claims.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no harm in pushing them for further data.

 

However, you mention inactivity on the account from November 1998 to October 2001 and if there was a nil balance during that period then there would (should) not have been any PPI applied for that period.

 

You don't need to submit copy statements at the preliminary stage of your complaint. If they claim not have data for a period where you do indeed have statements then you can submit them then.

 

As regards which spreadsheet to use, are there sizeable gaps in the statements you have or just small gaps here and there?

 

The Compound Interest spreadsheet will need further work on it as it is generally not appropriate for PPI claims.

 

Sorry ims should have been clearer.

 

I think they mean inactivity when account went into arrears and ppi cancelled I pressume. Then the balance was eventually paid and account closed.

 

I have most of statements for 1999 ( about 6 in total ) and all for 2000 and up to Oct 2001, so not many missing. So therefore shall I submit these with my complaint letter ?

 

I just wanted to enter details on the relevant spreadsheet to get some idea of potential figure if successful. Will the end date be last ppi payment when closed ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah right got you now.

 

So if the PPI was cancelled then there should be no further premiums featuring from that point onwards. Personally I wouldn't submit copies to start with...only if needed later if they try and wriggle out of something.

 

The ideal spreadsheet to use is the FosRunning sheet from here

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?330996-Latest-Spreadsheets-PPI-Claims-and-Charges-Claims-Dec-2011

 

Ideally you need all of the statements but you can use it if you are prepared to estimate the figures from the missing statements.

 

Sadly the refund of PPI is not as easy as just using a simple compound interest calculator.

 

What you need to bear in mind is that PPI redress on a running credit account such as a card will comprise the following....

 

1 -> A refund of all premiums charged to the account

2 -> A refund of any contractual interest charged as a result of those premiums

3 -> The account should be reconstructed with the above removed. If the reconstruction shows that in any month the account would have gone into a credit balance then 8% simple interest is awarded on that credit balance for that month.

4 -> If the account has been paid off and closed there will be a difference between the amount paid and the reconstructed balance. 8% simple is awarded on that difference running from the date of the payment to the date of settlement of the claim.

 

In addition you should be aware that any charges such as over limit charges which were triggered as a direct result of the PPI should be refunded together with any contractual interest charged as a result. The 8% simple mentioned above also applies to these.

 

So it is not a straightforward calculation to do. However, the spreadsheet I linked you to will deal with the PPI and associated interest to a fairly good degree but you may need to do some investigating and some maths as whether any charges incurred were as a direct result of the PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah right got you now.

 

So if the PPI was cancelled then there should be no further premiums featuring from that point onwards. Personally I wouldn't submit copies to start with...only if needed later if they try and wriggle out of something.

 

The ideal spreadsheet to use is the FosRunning sheet from here

 

 

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?330996-Latest-Spreadsheets-PPI-Claims-and-Charges-Claims-Dec-2011

 

Ideally you need all of the statements but you can use it if you are prepared to estimate the figures from the missing statements.

 

Sadly the refund of PPI is not as easy as just using a simple compound interest calculator.

 

What you need to bear in mind is that PPI redress on a running credit account such as a card will comprise the following....

 

1 -> A refund of all premiums charged to the account

2 -> A refund of any contractual interest charged as a result of those premiums

3 -> The account should be reconstructed with the above removed. If the reconstruction shows that in any month the account would have gone into a credit balance then 8% simple interest is awarded on that credit balance for that month.

4 -> If the account has been paid off and closed there will be a difference between the amount paid and the reconstructed balance. 8% simple is awarded on that difference running from the date of the payment to the date of settlement of the claim.

 

In addition you should be aware that any charges such as over limit charges which were triggered as a direct result of the PPI should be refunded together with any contractual interest charged as a result. The 8% simple mentioned above also applies to these.

 

So it is not a straightforward calculation to do. However, the spreadsheet I linked you to will deal with the PPI and associated interest to a fairly good degree but you may need to do some investigating and some maths as whether any charges incurred were as a direct result of the PPI.

 

Many thanks again ims for your kind help.

 

I will give it a go tomorrow, and if I have any further questions hope you don't mind me asking. If I do complete ok, would you mind just running the rule over it ?

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes someone will always be able to take a look.

 

What you might end up doing as this is so old is preparing some figures yourself to get to what you consider to be a reasonable settlement offer.

 

Should an offer come through which is fairly close to what you have calculated then you may be in a position to accept. If it is wildly off then you would need to look at which set of figures needs looking at, i.e. yours, theirs or both.

 

With something this old with some missing data it is unlikely to be cut and dried if you know what I mean.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes someone will always be able to take a look.

 

What you might end up doing as this is so old is preparing some figures yourself to get to what you consider to be a reasonable settlement offer.

 

Should an offer come through which is fairly close to what you have calculated then you may be in a position to accept. If it is wildly off then you would need to look at which set of figures needs looking at, i.e. yours, theirs or both.

 

With something this old with some missing data it is unlikely to be cut and dried if you know what I mean.

 

Thanks again ims and that was my intention.

 

Just a quickie before I go - just looked at spreadsheet and the first statement, I have figures as follows :-

 

Balance from previous statement £566.48 (Enter in col C ?)

payment received £50.00 (Enter in col D ?)

Credit card protection £4.30 (Col F ?)

Interest £6.25 (Also enter in col C ?)

 

New balance £527.03 (Less PPI payment in col J ?)

 

Does the above sound right ?

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

As this is your first statement then add the opening balance to the interest amount and the card protection figure (566.48 + 6.25 + 4.30) and enter that result in column C.

 

This will force the calculated closing balance to be correct.

 

Pop the payment figure of £50 in column D (as you said).

 

Pop the £4.30 in column F (as you said).

 

enter the interest rate for the card in the box at the top of the sheet and the sheet will work out the interest on the PPI for you

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

As this is your first statement then add the opening balance to the interest amount and the card protection figure (566.48 + 6.25 + 4.30) and enter that result in column C.

 

This will force the calculated closing balance to be correct.

 

Pop the payment figure of £50 in column D (as you said).

 

Pop the £4.30 in column F (as you said).

 

enter the interest rate for the card in the box at the top of the sheet and the sheet will work out the interest on the PPI for you

 

Many thanks ims that seems clearer now.

 

I will keep forum posted of any developments.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Further to my earlier post Natwest SAR failed to provide CCA, any copy of the original application form and any copies of correspondences / notes on my account. I did notify them that I was at my old address when card originally applied for.

 

Does any experts on here know anything about the 'NatWest Archive' system or had any experience with this ?

 

Do I now send a failed SAR letter and report to ICO ? Or shall I just proceed with my ppi complaint on the strength as to what I have and my reasoning for miss-selling ?

 

It's annoying as this is probably one of the only c/cards that I cannot trace my original agreement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Just to up-date the forum, my complaint was eventually up-held and offer recieved today.

 

The account is in arrears, so I know they will offset against outstanding debt but should I still recieve the net 8% statutory payment ?

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...