Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CSA problems


lashai013
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3594 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I really need advice.

Can I sue the CSA in court and get compensation for this.

  1. I was happily paying child support for my child with no issues until I met somebody, at which point the CSA was contacted by the mother out of spite. My case started in 2006 and continues to present day.
  2. They didn’t do my assessment correctly in 2009 creating arrears and the ICE got involved, I then received compensation but was still made to pay these arrears.
  3. They then contacted my work places by ‘mistake (3 times and different work places)’ causing me unnecessary stress and embarrassment. They then apologised but my health had already started to be affected.
  4. I then noticed (2013) that my arrears was extremely high and I again asked the ICE to get involved as I was getting nowhere with the CSA complaints procedure.
  5. Again they found maladministration and I got another apology and compensation, but to prove this I had to get bank statements ordered, write numerous letters and numerous costly phone calls. (more stress)
  6. Again my health was affected in a negative way and I will explain later.
  7. I was then informed that the arrears was 467.84 and in May 2014 myself and the CSA worked out a plan to clear these arrears by August 2014, to which I accepted as I thought that would be the end of it. I requested the transcript from the CSA to prove what was said and agreed.
  8. I also have a written document stating how much arrears I have left from ICE which supports and confirms what the CSA said.
  9. I then received a letter (Aug 8) with a new payment schedule which showed the arrears not being cleared and excessive amounts of money to be paid with no explanation.
  10. I then called the CSA on 09.08.14 and found the person to be very rude and unprofessional, they were more interested in the timing of the call as it was near the end of their shift, he was quite abrupt and actually hung up the phone at exactly 5pm, despite the fact I was clearly distressed.
  11. I spoke then called again on 11.08.14 for an explanation, to which they informed me that the ICE and themselves made a mistake and my arrears will not be cleared this month. They then apologised and explained that I have to pay these large amounts which I can’t afford.
  12. Health: Since the CSA got involved I have been stressed and had large amounts of anxiety. I saw my work counsellor and doctor about these issues. I also developed a tumour (which had to be removed) and I was informed it was stress related. I am getting sick again and saw the doctor and he also informed me that the swelling I am getting is stressed related. The only stress that can be causing this is the CSA and their incompetence as they have clearly embarrassed me and threatened to take large amounts of money from myself which I cannot afford. How am I expected to live and provide for my other child when I don’t know how much is going to be taken from me from month to month? How can I possibly give my students 100% attention and support when I am worrying about whether the CSA is going to contact my work place?
  13. Therefore can I now take this case out of the CSA and into the civil courts so that this incompetence can be dealt with once and for all before it causes any more damage to my health?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...