Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Darren v Lloyds TSB***WON***


dazzaboy2
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6121 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

 

Bit of advice needed. I used to have an account with these cowboys which was closed about 3 yrs ago. They also registered a default on my credit record. Now I am 100% sure that the charges they took from me over the years are a helluva lot more than the defaulted balance.

 

When I write my SAR, can I also challenge the default in the same letter or should I write a separate letter for each issue.

 

Thanks............

Darren :p

 

BOS - WON - £5.6k

------------------------------------------------

Virgin Mastercard - WON - £300

------------------------------------------------

Barclaycard - WON - £200

------------------------------------------------

Lloyds - WON - £1.6k

Link to post
Share on other sites

darren, take a look in the library- there are templates for this. http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/516-1-data-protection-act.html the time to refer to your default is when you send the prelim request for repayment when you have details of all the charges http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/671-2-letter-preliminary-approach.html this letter has the default piece included. hope it helps and good luck!:-)

I've beat HSBC, GE Money and Abbey

 

Court pending V Barclays and Time Retail

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Well,

 

I managed to get a hold of the account number and sort code from my local branch and have sent off my SAR.

 

They are apparently going to phone me when my statements are ready for collection.

 

We'll see lol.......................

Darren :p

 

BOS - WON - £5.6k

------------------------------------------------

Virgin Mastercard - WON - £300

------------------------------------------------

Barclaycard - WON - £200

------------------------------------------------

Lloyds - WON - £1.6k

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi guys,

 

Quick question. I'm just going thru my statements from Lloyds. The charges are nicely highlighted at the bottom of each page. However in the lists of charges, there is also a figure for o/d interest on some of the pages. Can I claim this back also? It is definately listed as a charge. However I am unsure if this applies to my authorised or unauthorised o/d interest.

 

Thanks.........

Darren :p

 

BOS - WON - £5.6k

------------------------------------------------

Virgin Mastercard - WON - £300

------------------------------------------------

Barclaycard - WON - £200

------------------------------------------------

Lloyds - WON - £1.6k

Link to post
Share on other sites

No. OD interest is not claimable, nor are any account service charges - ie for the 'select' account, etc.

 

Its the 'default' type fee's which your after, such as OD excess, OD usage, unpaid DD, etc.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well guys,

 

Prelim sent 26/01/2007.

 

Lets see what happens now......

Darren :p

 

BOS - WON - £5.6k

------------------------------------------------

Virgin Mastercard - WON - £300

------------------------------------------------

Barclaycard - WON - £200

------------------------------------------------

Lloyds - WON - £1.6k

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Reply recieved today saying "our charges are a service" blah blah and "we don't agree with the OFT" blah blah and " we ain't giving you them back" blah blah.........

 

We'll see.........

 

LBA time lol

Darren :p

 

BOS - WON - £5.6k

------------------------------------------------

Virgin Mastercard - WON - £300

------------------------------------------------

Barclaycard - WON - £200

------------------------------------------------

Lloyds - WON - £1.6k

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi all,

 

How does this POC look? I'm a bit behind with this claim...........have been distracted by my win of £5.6k from BOS lol.

 

Just need a quick double check of this!

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

The Claimant had an account, sort codes XXX, a/c no XXX with the Defendant, opened 1992 and closed 2003. 2. Since 01/12/2000 the Defendant has debited charges and interest in respect of purported breaches of contract. 3. Defendant is aware of all details as a list of charges has already been supplied. 4. Claimant contends: (a) The charges exceed the Defendant's losses caused by the breaches; (b) The Term permitting the Defendant to levy such charges is unenforceable under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999, Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 and at Common Law. 5. Claimant claims: (a) return of the amount debited of £1027.50; (b) Subject access request fee, £10.00. 6. Alternatively, if the charges are a fee for a service, then they must be reasonable under S.15 of the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982. 7. Costs allowed by the Court.

Claimant wishes to claim interest pursuant to section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% a year from 01/12/2000 to 01/03/2007 of £367.95 and also interest at same rate up to the date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of £0.22p per day.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks all!!

Darren :p

 

BOS - WON - £5.6k

------------------------------------------------

Virgin Mastercard - WON - £300

------------------------------------------------

Barclaycard - WON - £200

------------------------------------------------

Lloyds - WON - £1.6k

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well thats it done,

 

N1 completed, will be sent to court in the a.m.

 

Here we go again!!

 

:p

Darren :p

 

BOS - WON - £5.6k

------------------------------------------------

Virgin Mastercard - WON - £300

------------------------------------------------

Barclaycard - WON - £200

------------------------------------------------

Lloyds - WON - £1.6k

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

They have submitted a defence at the 11th hour......surprise surprise!

 

I have to complete an allocation questionnaire by the 10th of April.

 

This is their defence:

 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

1. The defendant LLoyds TSB Bnank plc (the bank) is a Bank whose registered office is 25 Gresham Street London ECV7HN. It is admitted that the Claimant has been a customer of the Bank at all material times.

 

2. By opening an account with the bank, the customer enters into a commercial arrangement with the bank for the provision of banking services. The bank is entitled to, as part of the arrangement, to charge for those services. At account opening, a customer is provided with details of the banks charges, currently in a leaflet a guide to our banking charges. By using the account, the customer acknowledges that the charges are incorporated into the contract. For personal customers, a number of services are provided for free, not withstanding that they are an expense to the bank. Such services include, but are not limited to, providing:

 

cheques

bank statements

the facility to make payments by direct debit and standing order

debit cards

ATM's

 

3. By maintaining the account in credit, or within any limit agreed with the bank, the customer may avoid most if not all charges. If the customer fails to ensure that there are sufficient cleared funds in the account to cover payments, whether by cheque, debit card, standing order or direct debit, the customer makes a request for payment to be made from the banks own funds. If the bank makes a payment, or returns the payment, it provides a service as specified in the leaflet and makes a charge in accordance with the terms of the contract. On page 1 of the leaflet, the bank explains that "there are normally no charges for everyday banking at Lloyds TSB when your account is in credit".

 

When you use an agreed overdraft, there is no monthly fee and we only charge interest on the amount you are overdrawn each day. Where you go overdrawn without an agreement or where you use special services such as copy statements, we will make a charge. This guide explains how these charges work and when they will apply. If you want to use a service that we haven't listed we'll tell you the cost of that service before you give us the go-ahead".

 

4. There is no brach of contract; the charge cannot therefore be a penalty, consequently there is no requirement that the charge be a pre estimate of the banks loss.

 

5. The customer is given advance warning of charges being imposed; statements show the charges, if any, the customer has incurred during the course of a month, and which will appear as debits on the following months statement. Customers are warned by letter when they go overdrawn or over their agreed limit without arrangement with the bank. If the customer fails to remedy the position, and payments such as standing orders and direct debits are refused then again the customer is warned by letter.

 

6. The charges are fair and reasonable, and it id denied they are unlawful.

 

7. The customer is notified of the charges in plain intelligible language at the conclusion of the contract, and on each monthly statement. The charge are terms which relate to the price payable by the customer for a service provided by the bank, and pursuant to Regulation 6 of the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999, are not subject to the assessment of fairness.

 

8. In the premesis:

 

8.1 The charges are for banking services and are not damages nor a penalty.

 

8.2 The bank is entitled by contract to impose the charges, which are fair and reasonable.

 

8.3 It is denied that the charges are unlawful or contravene any statute or regulation.

 

9. The claimants claim is denied in it's entirety. It is further denied that the claimant is entitled to the sum claimed or to any sum from the bank.

 

Stetement of truth etc etc.

 

Sechiari Clark Solicitors, Brighton

 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Now this is where I panic lol, HBOS never even submitted a defence when I sued them for almost 6k and I won by default. This as a result is all new to me now!! Is this a pretty standard defence from Lloyds?

 

I'll complete the allocatiuon questionnaire over the next couple of days.........

 

Feedback on the defence appreciated!

Darren :p

 

BOS - WON - £5.6k

------------------------------------------------

Virgin Mastercard - WON - £300

------------------------------------------------

Barclaycard - WON - £200

------------------------------------------------

Lloyds - WON - £1.6k

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi guys,

 

A little progress here now. I completed the AQ a while back and sent it down to the court. I used the 'new' approach posted here on the site, i.e. respectfully asking that the judge order Lloyds to disclose costs etc.

 

I recieved this in the post today.........

 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

District judge xxxxxx has considered the statements of case and allocation questionnaires filed and allocated the claim to the small claims track.

 

It is ordered that:

 

1. The hearing of the claim will take place at 10:00 on the 30th July 2007 at Bournemouth County Court and should take no longer than 1 hour.

 

2. The court must be informed immediately if the case is settled by agreement before the hearing date.

 

3. Each party shall deliver to every other party and to the court office copies of all documents (including any experts' reports) on which he intends to rely at the hearing no later than 21st May 2007.

 

4. The original documents shall be brought to the hearing.

 

5. Each party do send to the other party at least 5 working days before the final hearing their skeleton arguments - that is their note as to the relevantlegal principles that apply to the claim.

 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

What now? I presume this means the judge has not agreed with the draft order for directions?

 

I take it I just go ahead and send all the relevant stuff to the court and to Lloyds and then hope they make an offer?

 

Thoughts appreciated as always.

 

Cheers guys..................

Darren :p

 

BOS - WON - £5.6k

------------------------------------------------

Virgin Mastercard - WON - £300

------------------------------------------------

Barclaycard - WON - £200

------------------------------------------------

Lloyds - WON - £1.6k

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Daz, i didnt realise you had other claims on the go, i thought you had bailed after seeing off BOS ;-)

Cant help you with your Q as its the english system again , but just want to wish you all the best.

I have recently made succesful claims for my O/H and my Bro which included C.C.I, i had to read and reread your thread until i got my head around it but i got there in the end, so thats 4 down and one too go, unless anymore of the family rope me in.... ........ .......

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stevo,

 

This is my 3rd now. Won against BOS and Virgin Mastercard.

 

Still got BOS Visa and Barclaycard to go.

 

Bos Visa haven't even sent me my statements yet tho..........they're being very slippery!!

Darren :p

 

BOS - WON - £5.6k

------------------------------------------------

Virgin Mastercard - WON - £300

------------------------------------------------

Barclaycard - WON - £200

------------------------------------------------

Lloyds - WON - £1.6k

Link to post
Share on other sites

See this thread -

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/guidance-notes/64911-got-court-date-guide.html

 

The thread "Bong v Barclaycard" I believe has a skeleton argument example posted on it.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Guys,

 

I don't know if this is old news but it's kinda got me worried. It would appear that Lloyds have indeed appeared in court and WON their case against a customer claiming charges.

 

Heres a link to the article:

 

Bank costs ruling blow to customers - AOL Money

Darren :p

 

BOS - WON - £5.6k

------------------------------------------------

Virgin Mastercard - WON - £300

------------------------------------------------

Barclaycard - WON - £200

------------------------------------------------

Lloyds - WON - £1.6k

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right guys, one victory for them or not, I'm marching on!! They ain't beating me!

 

I'm just preparing my court bundle which I need to send like days ago but am unsure which set of T&C's I should include.

 

I've been on that archive site linked in one of GaryH's posts and they have loads..............but which should I use? I opened the account in the early nineties and am claiming back charges for the last 6 years.

 

Which ones should I include??

 

Thanks as always.

Darren :p

 

BOS - WON - £5.6k

------------------------------------------------

Virgin Mastercard - WON - £300

------------------------------------------------

Barclaycard - WON - £200

------------------------------------------------

Lloyds - WON - £1.6k

Link to post
Share on other sites

Use the oldest ones you can find - then also include ones where an amendment has been made, etc. Stick a couple in.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

guys,

 

I'm desperate!! My bundle is ready to go to court....and it's overdue :eek: , I'm praying they have a backlog!

 

I need a copy of the T&C's and I can't get it. The website archive thing won't give me anything.

 

Does anyone have a scan or link or something I can print out and add in quickly?

 

If not it I will have to submit my bundle without them.........

 

If anyone can help theres a beer in it for you!!!

 

HELP!!!

Darren :p

 

BOS - WON - £5.6k

------------------------------------------------

Virgin Mastercard - WON - £300

------------------------------------------------

Barclaycard - WON - £200

------------------------------------------------

Lloyds - WON - £1.6k

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok guys, call me daft but what part of the archive website do you need to click to get the t&c's?? I got on to the site but dont know where to go ffrom there.

 

Ta

Darren :p

 

BOS - WON - £5.6k

------------------------------------------------

Virgin Mastercard - WON - £300

------------------------------------------------

Barclaycard - WON - £200

------------------------------------------------

Lloyds - WON - £1.6k

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry, I mean the terms and conditions. I can't find a copy anywhere

Darren :p

 

BOS - WON - £5.6k

------------------------------------------------

Virgin Mastercard - WON - £300

------------------------------------------------

Barclaycard - WON - £200

------------------------------------------------

Lloyds - WON - £1.6k

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...