Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Are These Road Signs Illegal ?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3799 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 137
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't believe the signage is clear enough. It should be blue because you are more likely to take notice of a sign giving instruction rather than a white one giving information. As it is, it could suggest that the bus lane isn't immediately round the corner... but it is so the restriction is immediate thus meaning there should be an enforceable sign there with a plate showing the times of the enforcement period.

 

I agree with Jamberson... appeal on the grounds the signage before the junction is not the correct type.

  • Confused 1

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you to Green_and_Mean , Sailor Sam and Jamberson for looking at the situation from the actual legality side of the situation, I am going to research the actual signs required a bit more but I am almost certain that I will appeal.

My wife was in the wrong being in a Bus Lane but I believe the Council are also in the wrong by not displaying the correct signage and thus being the cause of the transgression.

 

Please keep us posted on what happens. It's likely the council will reject your appeal but that dosn't necessarily mean you cannot take it further.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's odd. You can turn into the road, but can only get out again with a right turn. So perhaps it should have a blue "turn right" arrow, with "except buses" and some times. Something like that, anyway.

 

I don't know what the correct signage should be, but I am pretty sure this is not compliant as it doesn't convey the necessary information, ie that you can't enter the carriageway at all with a left turn. It just says there is a bus lane in that direction.

 

As I said previously, I think if the current sign was blue with an advanced sign prior to it, that would cover it.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

that road sign is the proper sign for a bus lane as you are emerging from a side street,there is also lettering on the road there in giant white letters stating it is a bus lane,it is blatantly obvious your wife should have turned right and not left,pay the fine and chalk it down to experience,in fact,if you were to go to court and get a nit picking judge she might get fined for driving without due care and attention as well.

 

Actually it isn't. A "proper" sign for a bus lane is blue. The sign that the OPs wife passed was an information sign which, I say again, is not the correct sign at that point.

 

It is absolutely irrelevant what happened prior to the alleged offence being committed. It matters not that the driver knew there was a bus lane there if the signage is incorrect.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well if the op managed to get to court,nobody said there was a court involved,its cut and dried really but worse case scenario the op wants to go all the way with it,bit pointless really

 

Not your money though so not your problem is it?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not your money though so not your problem is it?

 

lol,thats for sure!

the signs are blue if you are on the main road not a side street leading onto a main road,and michael browne i used the go to court scenario as an example meaning only an idiot would take the ticket all the way as the offence is totally obvious to most people,maybe not you though!

 

The sign at the start of the bus lane should be blue. As you make the left turn, you immediately enter the bus lane. I'm sure you can work out the rest even with your limited knowledge.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ha ha,if the person were to go to court she probably would in such a scenario.Sailor sam I suggest you check the highway code sign for a side street turning into a bus lane,I did even with my limited knowledge,dont bother apologising to me for pointing out the fact you are totally wrong cos I dont care.

 

I don't need to apologise because it is YOU that is wrong. That sign would be correct IFthe bus lane was running along side an available lane to normal traffic. In this case there isn't, there is just the bus lane so there should be either a blue 'instruction' sign or a 'no left turn except buses' with a plate underneath indicating the times of the restriction.

 

Not sure why you keep rambling on about court as there is no court process involved. Mind you, i'm not sure why you are rambling on at all because your contribution to the thread is a big fat zero.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well sailor sam,you wont be told so Im not going to waste my time trying to tell you,go and invest in a highway code book,theyre only a couple a quid!

 

No...? But you did anyway! You really need to ask Santa to pop one into YOUR stocking as it's YOU that needs a copy!

 

As I have said, the sign would of been adequate if there had been an alternative route for the OP to have taken to avoid the bus lane. As there wasn't, then a enforceable type sign (either blue or red circular sign) should be at the point where the bus lane begins which is visible to a driver emerging from a side road. The sign that is there is an information sign only and thus, not enforceable. It does not indicate that there is no alternative way to turn left without entering the bus lane.

 

It's as simple as that really, whether you like it or not.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Citizenkain, your avatar it very apt for you, as you are obviously the one poking the other in the eye !!

And yes Life is a Pain.....................because of people like you.

Why do you post on an advice thread when all you want to do is criticise ?

 

Note how long he has been a Cagger for then look at his 'reputation' level (shown by the green squares). Says it all really.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Good news BUT strange explanation.

 

If they say that "A contravention occured and that had been correctly issued under the Traffic Management Act 2004." and "To confirm this Notice has been cancelled on this occasion only as a gesture of good willi", why are they going to the expense of putting a "No Left Turn" sign in place?

 

Just didn't want the risk of loosing at the adjudicator!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep has said all a long how many more had this happed to, its a way of making a good income, but now its been challenged they will have to put things rite.

 

Maybe a letter to you local rag would be in order? Maybe others in your position could do the same as you!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...