Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CSA "how payments are made"


AB1795
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3608 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Been paying through CSA for 5 years now as the NRP. I am a father of a one boy who lives with his mum.

 

The question I have is "Is there any legislation out there dictates how payments should be made"?

 

Reason for asking is my case has had so many changes recently that the amount kept changing. This made DD and SO really difficult. The last 5 monthly payments I have made on time via the phone with my card. Today the CSA called to say that they didnt have my payment. I am able to confirm via bank statements that it left my account 1/10/13. They said because they hadnt received it then I will be liable to a deductions from earnings order. It appears this is despite it being there mistake in aligning the payment made to my case.

 

Is it policy and procedure that payments must either be via DD or SO or a deductions from earnings order or can payments be any other way ?

 

Just for info, my ex wife chose to go to CSA and wont accept private agreement?

 

Anyone with any guidance please ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should have no problems paying by direct debit even if the amount keeps changing as it can be adjusted each month automatically whereas an SO can't. Don't see why you can't pay by card if thats what you want to do but there is nothing to stop your ex wife asking the CSA to take the payment by deduction of earnings.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly- check to make sure your bank had paid the money and get exact date and any ref No's. And inform the CSA if it still isn't showing as they can fish the funds from the big money pot. Probably they have put an incorrect digit on the transaction (should use your NINo). Please note that sometimes the banks take a while to appear on your case.

 

Secondly the PWC cannot demand a DEO (decuction of earnings order) as it is the decision of the CSA. Although a PWC can nag.

Thirdly the csa's accepted methods of payment are DD or DEO. You can ask them for a DEO yourself if you find it more convenient.

Set up a DD. They can't moan at you then. Also you are protected by the DD guarantee.

SAFU

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Secondly the PWC cannot demand a DEO (decuction of earnings order) as it is the decision of the CSA. Although a PWC can nag.

 

.

 

Yes, it tends to be a last resort action to be fair. It took 3 years of non payment for them to do a DEO on my ex

Link to post
Share on other sites

I assume PWC stands for 'Parent With Custody'? If thats the case then we can ask for a DEO, when I set my claim up I was given three options for payments and a DEO was one of them and its the option I chose. Its still in place today and will be until the CSA start charging for their service

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

The legislation states that the Parent With Care cannot request a DEO. The Non Resident Parent can request a DEO.

The Agency current preferred method of collection (MOC) is as follows

1 Direct Pay ("Maintenance Direct" or "Family Based Arrangement")

2 Direct Debt (Standing Order for cases dealt with "off the main system" or 'clerical')

3 Debit/Credit Card

4 Manual Cheque

 

 

For cases where the NRP is not paying then DEO becomes a preferred MOC but procedures must be followed (CSF745A/B/C Warning letter issued and no response within 7 days)

If you are making payments via a non-preferred MOC then provided you are compliant there is no reason a DEO should be in place

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...