Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

GE Capital bank - statements


Glenn UK
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6358 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Dear All

 

GE capital wrote to me recently telling me they only hold data for 5 years.

 

Now call me cynical but this is crap and the CAG contact at the ICO agrees.

 

If you have received a similar letter and don't have all your info please complain to the ICO. They have a file on them but its small, with your help it may grow soon.

 

Glenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear All

 

GE capital wrote to me recently telling me they only hold data for 5 years.

 

Now call me cynical but this is crap and the CAG contact at the Information Commissioners Office agrees.

 

If you have received a similar letter and don't have all your info please complain to the Information Commissioners Office. They have a file on them but its small, with your help it may grow soon.

 

Glenn

 

If you are keeping a record Glenn, I sent my complaint off today.

 

Sarah

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sarah

 

Excellent good for you, it would be good if anyone who complains about this issue posts on here, that way if/when i speak with my contact i can update them as to the scale of the problem.

 

Glenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not quite the same situation, but I (or rather my wife) received statements from GE money for her two store cards. Up to a certain point they provided photocopies of the statements themselves, and then from about 2003/2004 to the present they simply provided what was clearly a system printout where 'all' the transactions were on about 2 sheets, one after the other. At no point does it mention, on these latter sheets, any late payments, for either account, and I'm 150% certain that we had late payments on at least one of these accounts.

 

My concern is that they are missing off charge information. I'm in the process of getting the info off statements themselves, which i forwarded to our debt consolidation company - they're having a look for me. In the meantime it does potentially open up a question as to whether or not they are providing full information.

 

Anyone else get this problem?

Halifax: FULL REFUND

_________

Lloyds TSB: FULL REFUND

__________

HSBC Current Acct: FULL REFUND

__________

Capital One (three accounts); GE Money (Mothercare); GE Money (Burton):

Getting round to sending off first letters...!

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have been at logger heads with this g.e. for three months over my s.a.r.

the info they sent me was undecipherable with the abbreviations list sent to me missing a good 50% of the abbreviations not transcribed..i have taken this up with the data control officer of ge...but they deny anything is wrong and i am certain there are loads of charges not listed on the breakdown...they are so slow at responding to your letters on these matters and even tried the "files are not subject to the data protection act because they are not in an orderly system" malarky on me...jokers to say the least and i will certainly be bringing this to the attention of the i.c.o...it took them 50 odd days to comply with the s.a.r. they are a joke and need pulling in to line and i will certainly do my all to ensure this happens. ;) 007

"ALWAYS QUOTE ME AS BEING MISQUOTED" :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers for that Mr Bond! I've started my own thread too, so as to avoid accusations of hijacking :p heh heh

 

Do you have a Licence to Sue? heh

Halifax: FULL REFUND

_________

Lloyds TSB: FULL REFUND

__________

HSBC Current Acct: FULL REFUND

__________

Capital One (three accounts); GE Money (Mothercare); GE Money (Burton):

Getting round to sending off first letters...!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guys

 

The ICO is really interested in failures to cmply with the DPA and its intent, ie. tosupply you with the data your entitled to in the timeframe set out and in an understandable format.

 

If they are not doing this then they arent complying and you should complain to the ICO.

 

If no one complains then the ICO thinks everything is hunky dory.

 

Glenn

  • Haha 1

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just complained to the Information Commissioner about G E 's failure to supply requested information. I downloaded a complaint form from their website and it probably took me about 10 minutes to complete and get the supporting evidence together.

 

Hope this helps

 

Sarah

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good on you guys,

 

I spoke to the ICO yesterday and they are quite keen to take up the issues of organisations failing to comply.

 

I know that they have started on GE Money and the more complaints they receive the better since it supports any initiatives they may take.

 

Glenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi Glenn

I am fairly new on this site and have noticed from reading different threads you always crop up with good advice. So I wondered if you could advise me on how to work out interest on credit cards especially.

For intance GE Money is something like 29.8% how do you deal with the calculations as the sppreadsheets on the system all seem to to be geared to 8%.

Also, Capital One, I have noticed use different rates during a 6 year period

so how can you reliably work these out each month.

I am a little confused and want to get my claim right. I am also going to have a big GO with SHABBEY as they owe me big time.

Look forward to hearing from you,

Regards

DS

Link to post
Share on other sites

DS

 

Beofre I launch into a dilaogue (or is it diatribe? LOL), may i suggest you start your own thread/s or if you already have, send me a link via pm and ill comment there save hijacking this thread if thats ok.

 

GLenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Update for the thread:

 

Just before Christmas I received a reply from the ICO regarding G E Money. In it, they stated that they believed that GE had contravened the sixth principle of the DPA. They went on to say that they were going to be contacting GE money to try and establish why they had not produced the information (sorry for not updating on this before)

 

Today I received another letter from the ICO stating that they had been in touch with G E Money. I will precis the relevant bits below:

 

" GE Money explained to me that they were unable to provide you with some of your personal data as it had not been archived and so it was not possible for them to retrieve the information. GE Money cited problems with a number of external companies for these occurences and stated that steps were being taken to ensure such problems did not re-occur. This resulted in them being unable to supply a small amount of personal date for the period between June 2004 and September 2004 and personal data prior to September 2001.

 

My colleagues in the Information Commisioner's Regulatory Action Division have liaised with GE Money regarding this problem. The outcome of my assessment (dated 12/12/2006) shall remain unchanged as GE Money were unable to provide you with some of the personal data that you were entitled to under the subject access provisions of the Act."

 

 

Interesting isn't it that in their last letter to me, GE stated that they did not have to provide data older than 5 years as this was the length of retention for Money Laundering purposes - now this is a glitch with outside agencies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have 8 statements missing from GE. Mine are Sept 02, Sept 03, Nov 03, Jan - Jun 04. These seem to be outside the dates that they given to the Commisioner!

Creation Financial Services--S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 18 Oct

Statements received 28 Oct

PAR sent 30 Oct for £910 Credited £282 as Good will Offer

LBA sent 28 Dec for £730

N1 filled out, but they phoned and settelled in full 19 Jan:D

GE Capital--S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 18 Oct

Capital One---S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 18 Oct

Great Universal(Littlewoods Shop Direct--S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 18 Oct

PAR sent 19 Jan

 

Nat West--S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 26 Oct

Received 27 Oct

Acknowledgement received 28 Oct

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update for the thread:

 

Just before Christmas I received a reply from the Information Commissioners Office regarding G E Money. In it, they stated that they believed that GE had contravened the sixth principle of the Data Protection Act. They went on to say that they were going to be contacting GE money to try and establish why they had not produced the information (sorry for not updating on this before)

 

Today I received another letter from the Information Commissioners Office stating that they had been in touch with G E Money. I will precis the relevant bits below:

 

" GE Money explained to me that they were unable to provide you with some of your personal data as it had not been archived and so it was not possible for them to retrieve the information. GE Money cited problems with a number of external companies for these occurences and stated that steps were being taken to ensure such problems did not re-occur. This resulted in them being unable to supply a small amount of personal date for the period between June 2004 and September 2004 and personal data prior to September 2001.

 

My colleagues in the Information Commisioner's Regulatory Action Division have liaised with GE Money regarding this problem. The outcome of my assessment (dated 12/12/2006) shall remain unchanged as GE Money were unable to provide you with some of the personal data that you were entitled to under the subject access provisions of the Act."

 

 

Interesting isn't it that in their last letter to me, GE stated that they did not have to provide data older than 5 years as this was the length of retention for Money Laundering purposes - now this is a glitch with outside agencies.

 

Hi Sarah

Only just seen this thread. As you know I am fighting both GE Capital and Buchanan Clark & Wells whom I believed GE Capital sold the so called debt onto. I have never had any correspondence from GE or BCW regarding the original agreement or the deed of transfer, despite sending DPA/SAR, non compliance letters, CCA letter, non compliance to that and threat of Court Action etc...

Just out of curiosity are GE Money the same as GE Capital?

 

I will download that complaint form myself and get that off as a matter or urgency, I've had enough.........

Boo

;) Boobaby

Please hit the scales if you think I've helped!

Please note that advice given is purely my opinion and should be treated as such.

FAQ’s

http://www.consumeractiongroup.c o.uk/forum/faqs-please-read-these/

HSBC Claim - August 2006 £2,700 paid November 2006

Halifax Claim - August 2006 £4,100 paid December 2006

GE Capital - August 2006 - settled

Log Book Loans - August 2007 - sorted

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Boo- yes, they are the same and yes, please do complain. The more legitimate complaints the better so, that the ICO can see a pattern. By the way, I just found out today (not because GE told me) that they have forwarded the amount of charges I was claiming (but, not the contractual interest) to the DCA which was contrary to my explicit requests in all correspondence so, if they think they have seen the last of me, they are mistaken!

 

Good Luck - keep us updated

 

Steve- the letter which was sent back to me from the ICO reflected my own, specific complaint so, you will need to lodge your own complaint with the ICO to get their opinion on your missing statements. Different people are missing statements from different time periods which rather negates GE's argument that the problem was only for very short times!

 

Good luck to you too

 

 

Sarah

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...