Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

diskmandave vs aqua card - MCOL action - ** Settled/Cheque Banked **


diskmandave
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3779 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Dave

 

Your spreadsheet is fine.

 

You are a seasoned member so please don't take the following in the wrong way...

 

1 -> As you are going back further than six years, are you prepared with your arguments around Kleinwort Benosn -v- Lincoln City Council (payments made under a mistake) which should get you around the Limitations Act?

 

2 -> Are you familiar with the principles of Interest in Restitution since you are claiming interest on the charges beyond the date on which interest would have stopped (based on your comment that the account is all now in order?

 

The latter point is mentioned in case you are asked to justify to a court why your interest calcs run beyond the date where they may well have ceased charging interest if the account is now running on the basis that you pay it off each month in full.

 

Yeah, got it all IMS... Also, that charges when reduced to £12 were not refunded and therefore hidden, thus an illegal act...

 

As for point 2.... I'll happily accept a negotiated settlement.

 

I'm FULLY committed to this now....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 149
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

N1 Salford if you need to add attachments and use an indepth PoC.

 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I can update this now.......

Have got another sod off and bother the FOS letter, I'll scan after tea...

 

Letter comes from Aqua Card Services, so CLEARLY, the Registered Office address is correct.

 

Going to do this by MCOL, all new to me now, so help would be appreciated.

And those that know me of old will know that I won't back down...

Edited by diskmandave
Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's the response to the LBA to "Progressive Credit Limited", clearly the right company as

the response is on Aqua standard letterhead... Doesn't acknowledge LBA at all, just goes back

to first response & refusal, go bother the FOS.....

 

img068_zpsebb32ee4.jpg

 

Have now registered with MCOL and start building a claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

one point to note

 

the FCA [FSA now]

made NO recommendations on ANYTHING other than BANK CHARGES.

 

it DOES not apply to credit card companies nor loans.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've now completed & saved stages 1 to 4 of the MCOL process,

I'll need a kickstart with the PoC.... Just a general idea, I learn quickly!

 

I've started with.....

 

"The claimant claims that aqua credit card (Progressive Credit Limited)............."

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've sent you a PM. Hope that helps.

  • Haha 1

George Loveless - “We raise the watchword, liberty. We will, we will, we will be free!"

 

My advice is only my opinion, I am not a legal expert.

 

IF YOU LIKE THE ADVICE I'M GIVING AND ARE HAPPY WITH IT, CLICK THE SCALES ON THE BOTTOM LEFT OF THIS POST AND TELL ME.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't know whats up, been in my general settings and all of my PM seems to be turned on....is yours? Either way still not coming through.

George Loveless - “We raise the watchword, liberty. We will, we will, we will be free!"

 

My advice is only my opinion, I am not a legal expert.

 

IF YOU LIKE THE ADVICE I'M GIVING AND ARE HAPPY WITH IT, CLICK THE SCALES ON THE BOTTOM LEFT OF THIS POST AND TELL ME.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK... Thanks orfoster, it's not private anyway, I'll post them at some point...

 

PM reply basically said thanks for your statement of claim that you sent me, and that

the particulars of claim POC that I've come up with are this.......

 

The Claimant claims that aqua credit card

(SAV Credit Limited) has applied over

the duration of a credit agreement, unlawful

penalty charges amounting to £184.00. The

interest rate for this account is 39.95% and

the Claimant claims interest from the date of

charges at that rate. Some of the charges go

beyond six years, however, the Claimant

claims that these were payments made under

mistake, Kleinwort Benosn -v- Lincoln City

Council (payments made under a mistake) and

seeks full recovery regardless. The Claimant

first approached the Defendant on 27th July

2013 with an initial approach for repayment,

this approach was rejected, and the Claimant

then served the Defendant with a Letter

Before Action on 11th October 2013, the

response received on 30th October being

almost identical to the initial approach and

refusal leaves little option but to take the

Court route. The Claimant claims the full

amount of Penalty Charges to be repaid, plus

interest at the account rate, and all costs

at the County Court rate applicable.

 

Thanks again mate... :-)

Edited by diskmandave
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...