Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

refusing to attend counselling


badbessie
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3928 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My brother-in-law as a history of depression and anxiety. His G.p as offered counselling. He as just started the process of moving onto ESA from IB and feels that this would be too much at the present time. He is now worried that if he refuses the doctor will not support him. He is going back in two weeks time and I would like opinions of anyone who as been in a similar situation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI, Of course it is your brother-in-laws right to refuse counselling. However, I believe he should go back to his G.P and ask exactly what he means.

I believe your G.P means Cognitive/ behavioural therapy. It may help him in a number of ways.

Anxiety is very different to each individual and the therapy is shaped to meet the needs of the individual. It as a number of forms. It can teach coping mechanisms that can reduce the amount of medications that your brother-in-law needs to take. It can also help him to start dealing with day to day situations.

Please ask your brother-in-law to read the link below. Due to the nature of the therapy it will give a good representation of his problems which may help when dealing with ATOS in the future

 

ww.mind.org.uk/assets/0001/7324/Making_sense_of_CBT_2012.pdf

Edited by mr_mastiff
missed letter
Link to post
Share on other sites

i can see where your coming from with this and as people have said its his right to refuse counselling if he chooses too but it might help him in the future but only when he is ready to do it though CBT can work but not for everyone

 

i cant see that being a big problem where his ESA is concerned you dont have to get the GP to write on the form you can put all the information on there yourself if you want to help him as long as he has his diagnoses and medication ect ect then just put as much info on as you can how it effects him? daily life ? etc etc

 

does he not have a CPN? or is he currently under the CMHT? ( community mental health team )

Link to post
Share on other sites

Time4change2, I could not agree more, I have two bouts of CBT the first was stopped by my counsellor because there was too many outside influences (ATOS appeals etc) affecting me. Now that that is over for now! I have just started my second course. The reason that I found it helpful with Atos was that we both keep a diary of day to day life and how I was effected and my reaction to them. Each Session lasted an hour and it provided detailed descriptions of my problems. I do not think that he should start the therapy now but should leave it as an option.

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your replies, Yes he does have a CPN but he is on a course at the moment. My sister contacted the GP and it is CBT. He stated that it will start when my brother-in-law is ready. So i have jumped the gun a bit with my question. Thankyou for your help.:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...