Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Been With Eurodebt DMP for over 11 years [now discover most of my debts are...)


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3799 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

if you are paying expert THEY must have the CCA

 

send it back!!

 

it might be an idea now as letters are beginning to arrive

 

to start a new thread for EACH DEBT

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 76
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Lowells rarely ever have teh correct paperwork for a debt. Thats why they try and push everything through the courts before you realise. Once you have admitted the debt, or even part of it, they win.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will do. Will keep this thread for Crapboot and start new one for each DCA. I have written to 8 DCA for CCA and none of them could provide it on time.

Dx, Appreciate your continue support and look forward to see your input on other thread. Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lowells rarely ever have teh correct paperwork for a debt. Thats why they try and push everything through the courts before you realise. Once you have admitted the debt, or even part of it, they win.

Now you are scaring me. There is no way I could afford to pay 12K. How can they push it through the court if the debt is not enforceable?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats why you need to sit down and get all the paperwork in order. regarding court, its not scary. The judge looks at the evidence towards what the claim is for. He doesnt take sides. If you have all the paperwork or evidence to show lowell cant go through with the claim, then youre pretty much guaranteed to win.

  • Confused 1

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now you are scaring me. There is no way I could afford to pay 12K. How can they push it through the court if the debt is not enforceable?

 

Hi Rayn,

 

Looks like a bit of scaremongering going on, but Lowell will usually only go to court or issue statutory demands if they know or 'believe' that an alleged debtor has sufficient equity in property or means to meet a judgement order.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Update: Crapbot wrote again today. Please see attached. What will be my next move? Should I now stop token payment? Should I send further correspondence to Cabot in reply to this letter? IF yes, please help me with a template.

Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No cca means no enforcement after judgement. I would keep the token payment at £1 month for another month then stop.

 

Also send the non compliance letter.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

and another fleecer bites the dust..

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

UPDATE:

 

After 7 weeks,

received CCA reply from Barclays on behalf of Crapbot.

 

Again no original agreement but just the reconstituted copy of T & C's. No signature.

 

Funny enough Crapbhot thinks its enforceable which is misleading.

 

Please see attached reply from Barclays and Cabot.

 

I now have 3 different CCA looking like this.

 

I would appreciate BRIG and DX help on my next move.

 

Please help...

Link to post
Share on other sites

typical load of absolute TWADDLE from crapbot.

 

ignore them

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

that wont make them go away

 

pers i'd be ignore till/if you ever get court papers.

 

total willy waving up till now.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

how the MBNA/link paperwork going

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi DX, I have received CCA from MBNA and it looks original and enforceable. I will post it soon for your advise.

 

No reply to SAR yet as they required more information. Please see my other recent posts and please let me have your FEED back. Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rayn

I know I have replied on other threads but just for the record

 

Compliance with a S77 or S78 request does not necessarily mean they can enforce. These requests are for information only . The agreements have to be set out in a certain way and include certain terms otherwise they are improperly executed and thus S65 and S127(3) kick in . You had the link for what the prescribed terms .

 

My advice is to react as opposed to being proactive so for example I wouldn't send a failure to comply letter unless they ask you why you have stopped paying. If they send you an incomplete CCA request reply with a letter stating they have failed to comply but not tell them exactly what. If they send you everything but the agreement is flawed then yes tell them that the prescribed terms aren't there or that it is improperly executed but don't do their job for them.

 

It's all about keeping a paper trail so that if you ever get a claim issued against you , you can defend it .

 

I am not promoting avoiding your debts but you cant give what you don't have. My debts are c45K and I haven't paid a penny in 18 months. As I have no job or assets (but am happy) there is little point in them taking any action, meanwhile I can muddy the waters .

An example, one of my creditors appears to have sent a perfectly enforceable set of documents to me. However the DN is bad and thus the termination is bad. Leading on from this the T&C's that apply now are not the ones they sent me(they dropped the interest rate to 0) . Keeping that one up my sleeve should they try anything

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers Fletch for your valuable comments. I will stick to your points and you are absolutely correct that we cant give what we don't have. My debt is probably around £40k however none of them seems to be enforceable. I now regret why I didn't come across CAG long earlier. I have paid enough money to ED.

 

Lowlife (Barclays Loan) and one debt with Crapboot (BC) yet to get back to me with my CCA request and it has already been almost 3 months.

Link to post
Share on other sites

WEll done. I know ED have had lots of money off you but certainly in my case it was , at the time money well spent. I couldn't have done all that was needed without their help

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

UPDATE:

 

I had couple of BC debt with Crapboot,

 

I am still waiting for CCA on £5k debt since August.

 

Last correspondence I had from them was back in October (See attached).

 

I haven't heard anything since.

 

Should I write to them asking to close the account?

 

On second dedt,

 

CCA request was received but reconstituted which I contested,

 

their recent reply after my Non-Com letter is attached.

 

Looks like another win win situation for me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Theyre playing the moral angle. Basically:

 

" We know and admit we will never be able to get this through court, and we've even harassed you for payment without checking if we hold the correct paperwork. But you should still pay us because its the 'right thing to do'"

 

i'd tell them to go play with traffic and andy further communication will be considered harassment and treated as such.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

give me my moneyback you fleecers!!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...