Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Larssonn V Lloyds TSB Scotland


larssonn
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6432 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi guys

 

Very interesting reading on this forum. I see that the banks have changed their strategy a bit from a few months ago and would like a few pointers on what to expect.

 

I am due in court this Monday coming (23rd Oct 2006) and have not received a defence acknowledgement from the bank - only a copy of the fax sent to the court last minute. I haven't had any letters, emails or calls from them and therefore expect to be in court.

 

My main concerns are:

  • Will they use certain tactics to get the claim thrown out, and if so, what things should I be aware of?
  • Should I have all correspondence ready to be taken down to court or will this be a simple 'prelim' type of hearing to arrange a proper date?
  • I remember reading somewhere about bank charge leaflets and should I go to the bank for a copy to take to the court, or is there an online version?

As a footnote, I have been informed by someone making a claim that the judges in Dundee Sherrif Court are in debate over the Lloyds TSB claim that any claims being initiaited in Dundee should be done in Edinburgh as the registered office is in Edinburgh. They will have a decision today (20 Oct 2006). Another delay tactic by the fat cats.

Thanks for all help

Lloyds TSB - Claim for £759 - Full Settlement Offered - No Terms Implied - 11 Aug 06 :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a Claim with Lloyds TSB through Dundee Sheriff Court..was due on Monday 23rd October too 0930Hrs..Havnt heard anything about Dundee Sheriff's transferring cases to Edinburgh..Im going in this week to stick anither claim in against Lloyds TSB ..so I will ask the Clerk when Im in.

 

I would check your bank account online if you can..They Paid me in Full Yesterday Afternoon.:D :D . Got a call from some Plonker in Brighton , Legal guy for Lloyds telling me that they had settled..Did't like to tell him..Mmmm I know and Ive shifted it other account..lol

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/scotland/38902-reid-lloyds-tsb.html

Lloyds TSB -PPI - Full refund . 05/09/06 :D:p (As Seen on TV) :p

Halifax settled in Full.. :D 22/09/06

TSB First Claim SETTLED IN FULL 19/10/06 :D

Second Claim to Lloyds TSB - Settled in Full

Firstplus - early settlement interest charges - Challenged the use of the rule of 78 - SETTLED IN FULL 12/1/07

PPI - GE Money / Purpleloans / Firstplus - Now Settled after 1 year long hard fight.

 

 

 

If my post has helped you, please click the scales! :grin:

 

Anything said is my opinion and how I understand the law, always consult professional legal advice before taking something to court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hej Larsson;)

 

I wouldn't worry about this transferring business, if it is the same issue I ran into: I had a similar issue where I put my claim in in Edinburgh Sheriff Court against Clydesdale based in Glasgow.

 

At first this caused a delay because the clerks and the sheriff wanted to check if they actually had jurisdiction in such a case and whether I would have to put my claim in Glasgow.

 

Apparently, they are not completely clued up on some of the jurisprudence, so I gave them some additional information about the matter of jurisdiction, printed out from the Govan Law centre website. The link for this information is here: Unfair UK Bank Charges | legal help from Govan Law Centre, Glasgow, UK

 

Bottom line is: as a consumer you have the right to pursue the bank in your place of domicile, so if you stay in Dundee but your bank is based in Edinburgh, you should stll be able to file your claim in Dundee.

 

After the people at Dundee court have worked this out, the case should go ahead as usual. In my case, this caused a couple of weeks delay before they acknowledged this and put the case on the schedule and set a date.

 

You might be able to speed things up as well by supplying them the legal information confirming that you should be able to raise an action in Dundee.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys

 

Thanks for the responses. I had a call from the bank late Friday afternoon saying that they had settled. I told them I would send a dismissal notice to the court once I was satisfied the amount was correct - which is was.

 

As for the jurisdiction debate at the court, I will print off the GLC notes and do 2 versions of the 1B form - 1 for Dundee and the other for Edinburgh.

 

Good to get some real life advice as it keeps you sane!

Lloyds TSB - Claim for £759 - Full Settlement Offered - No Terms Implied - 11 Aug 06 :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done m8 Looks like Lloyds TSB made a few panic calls on Friday Afternoon..lol Well with bit of luck second claim might be quicker.. Im going down to put it in tomorrow..but its smaller one..lol

 

Ian

Lloyds TSB -PPI - Full refund . 05/09/06 :D:p (As Seen on TV) :p

Halifax settled in Full.. :D 22/09/06

TSB First Claim SETTLED IN FULL 19/10/06 :D

Second Claim to Lloyds TSB - Settled in Full

Firstplus - early settlement interest charges - Challenged the use of the rule of 78 - SETTLED IN FULL 12/1/07

PPI - GE Money / Purpleloans / Firstplus - Now Settled after 1 year long hard fight.

 

 

 

If my post has helped you, please click the scales! :grin:

 

Anything said is my opinion and how I understand the law, always consult professional legal advice before taking something to court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Piggy Bank.

I have hit the Clydesdale with 7 small claims, all covering different periods and they have intimated that will defend them " craves the court to conjoin the actions and remit the conjoined action to the Ordinary Roll under Rule 15(1) of the Small Claims Rules 2002"

What does the "Ordinary Roll " mean and has anybody had experience of the request to transfer to another court ?

I have brought the claims to court in the town in which I reside and in which the bank branch in question is located. and I assume thet this is the correct location, in fact this was confirmed by the court officer who accepted the claims paperwork originally.

I presume from this that they want to lump the claims together but Rule 15(1) specifically talks about "Transfer to another Court"

Does anyone have experience of this reaction to claims?

HRB

Link to post
Share on other sites

Piggy Bank.

I have hit the Clydesdale with 7 small claims, all covering different periods and they have intimated that will defend them " craves the court to conjoin the actions and remit the conjoined action to the Ordinary Roll under Rule 15(1) of the Small Claims Rules 2002"

What does the "Ordinary Roll " mean and has anybody had experience of the request to transfer to another court ?

I have brought the claims to court in the town in which I reside and in which the bank branch in question is located. and I assume thet this is the correct location, in fact this was confirmed by the court officer who accepted the claims paperwork originally.

I presume from this that they want to lump the claims together but Rule 15(1) specifically talks about "Transfer to another Court"

Does anyone have experience of this reaction to claims?

HRB

 

Did you file all seven claims at once?, if so , this is the reason for them requesting a conjoined action.

I think they are referring to act of sederunt(Ordinary Cause) , have a look on the scottish courts website. It explains all the actions there.

Ordinary Cause Rules

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

HRB, filing all seven at once was a big mistake. We advise people never to do this. Clydesdale will go to court and have them all joined into one, which will take you out of small claims.

Robertxc v. Abbey - £3300 Settled in full

Robertxc v. Clydesdale - £750 Settled in full

Nationwide v. Robertxc - £2000 overdraft wiped out, Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Style Card - Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Abbey (1) - Data Protection Act action. £750 compensation

Robertxc v. Abbey (2) - Data Protection Act action. £2000 compensation, default removed

 

The opinions on this post are those of Robertxc and not necessarily the opinions of the group and do not constitute sound legal advice. You are advised to seek professional legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very interesting day in Court today. I am concerned about discussing, over this very public forum, the results of todays court hearing and my tactics for the next round. Presumably our opponents have a good look around this site to see what is happening from our side.

Let it be said that I was pleased with todays outcome and would be happy to discuss details by direct e-mail etc.

Once the outcome is known, I would be more than happy to have the story told over the site to assist others in their quest for satisfaction.

Do you want to have a quick private update ? I am not sure we can do this within this site??

HRB

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can PM me if you like - it will be in confidence. :(

Robertxc v. Abbey - £3300 Settled in full

Robertxc v. Clydesdale - £750 Settled in full

Nationwide v. Robertxc - £2000 overdraft wiped out, Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Style Card - Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Abbey (1) - Data Protection Act action. £750 compensation

Robertxc v. Abbey (2) - Data Protection Act action. £2000 compensation, default removed

 

The opinions on this post are those of Robertxc and not necessarily the opinions of the group and do not constitute sound legal advice. You are advised to seek professional legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Click on my username, and then click on 'Send personal message'

Robertxc v. Abbey - £3300 Settled in full

Robertxc v. Clydesdale - £750 Settled in full

Nationwide v. Robertxc - £2000 overdraft wiped out, Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Style Card - Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Abbey (1) - Data Protection Act action. £750 compensation

Robertxc v. Abbey (2) - Data Protection Act action. £2000 compensation, default removed

 

The opinions on this post are those of Robertxc and not necessarily the opinions of the group and do not constitute sound legal advice. You are advised to seek professional legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...