Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Old Egg loan/Canada Square letter


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3809 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello All

 

I would be grateful for some advice. Out of the blue, I've received a letter from Canada Square Operations saying their records show I purchased PPI with an Egg loan. The loan was actually to repay the balance on an Egg credit card and the loan was suggested to me over the phone. I don't recall filling in a form. I can't remember the start date, but I settled the balance in November 2007.

 

They've included a questionnaire for me to complete if I want to make a claim.

 

My problems are:

 

1. I had no idea PPI was involved, and I understand from other threads that it is not a good idea to say this.

 

2. Since I didn't know about the PPI, I haven't got any paperwork on it at all; I kept it until a house move 2 years ago, dammit!

 

SO

 

Do I ask for an SAR - they probably do have the file as it's not yet six years since settlement?

 

Otherwise there are a lot of questions I can't answer.

 

However I am fairly confident that if an SAR reveals that PPI was involved that I will have a valid claim since:

 

1. I was self-employed and I had both an income protection plan and a critical illness policy with another provider

 

2. I have successfully claimed PPI from my bank

 

To complicate matters I am moving house in 2 weeks' time. I gather they are pretty stern about proof of address.

 

All help gratefully received!

 

Kind regards,

 

Magiciansgirl

Link to post
Share on other sites

All credit providers are doing this.

Yes a SAR is a very good idea.

 

Get the SAR off before you move and either have post redirected or provide your new address to them on making the SAR.

 

Your claim appears valid.

  • Confused 1

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep sar

 

as the cc wold have had I bet PENALTY charges & it's own PPI

 

so you've been hit TWICE with int on both & a new PPI to boot.

 

nice reclaim coming on.

 

stay off the phone

 

DO NOT answer any questions they phone up to ask

 

EVERYTHING in WRITING ONLY please

put the phone down

 

dx

  • Confused 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, gentlemen! I feel encouraged and supported.

 

So I won't admit to them this has all come as a surprise.....and don't worry, I won't take a phone conversation. :-)

 

I feel they must have ticked boxes without telling me, as I did know what PPI was earlier than 2007, and I'm not daft. (Well, a bit stupid to have shredded the paperwork - heigh ho - thought I was safe to do so 5 years after settling up). I've managed to find how much I paid off in 2007 by looking at bank statements online, and it was over £8000. I wouldn't have taken on a loan larger than £5000 in the first place as I've never had a credit card limit larger than £4500.

 

Thanks again! MG

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

not your thread.

 

click the sar and see!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

that's very very true

 

and watchout for the phonecalls too

everything in writing only

 

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Hi all, and Happy Christmas!

 

Just wanted to report that Canada Square have now upheld my PPI claim (I started this thread).

 

It has taken this long because they wanted proof of address before sending the SAR, then again when I had submitted the claim;

moving this year may have been the reason but I did hint that I thought asking twice was a delaying tactic.

 

after I had adapted a template letter to my circumstances they sent a questionnaire, and

I took the advice on here and filled in the FOS one instead.

 

Finally, in the week before Christmas

they wrote to say they are sending me £2067.

 

I am delighted by this as I had no idea there had ever been PPI so it really is worth following up if you get a letter out of the blue.

(and recorded delivery every time, too).

 

Thanks for the help everyone, and if the cheque is late I will use the 0800 number.

 

Kind regards, Magiciansgirl

Link to post
Share on other sites

let us know when you get the cheque and i'l mark the thread.

 

how does this compare to you spreadsheet?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Didn't need to do a spreadsheet as it was a straightforward claim and once I'd got the SAR I knew how much to claim, having paid off the loan itself in 2007. 8% interest on the PPI offered and accepted, also rebate of interest on the PPI paid so am satisfied.

 

Will comment again when cheque received.

 

Kind regards, MG

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...