Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

NATWEST success............or not


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3974 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just received a cheque from Natwest almost 2 years after I started my complaint. They finally capitulated after a complaint to FOS. Total PPI payments were £2329 but they have only added interest (at 8%) of £965. No contractual interest. What is the next step?

 

suvin50

Link to post
Share on other sites

Were you not able to calculate your own expectations before making the original complaint ?

 

When you say, what is the next step.. Have you received a letter from NW - acceptance letter, which you have to sign before they will release the cheque. Or have you only been told by the FOS that NW have agreed ?

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

was this a credit card?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I should have explained better.

 

It was a credit card taken out in 1999.

Monthly interest was 1.313%.

 

They sent me a cheque, no letter of acceptance.

 

I don't have any statements prior to 2003.

 

PPI payments for the statements I have, 15 months from January 2003 to May 2004, were between £57 and £59 per month.

Balance was normally £8000-£10000.

 

cancelled the insurance after they refused to pay out on a claim.

I was self-employed.

The account was paid off in 2007 after I sold my house. (There was a charging order).

 

Balance was £10526 but, having looked again at the statements, I actually paid £11628, leaving a credit balance of £1101.

 

This appeared on my statements until April 2007 when it mysteriously disappeared and was transferred to Fort Recs, whatever that is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Weird and clearly wrong of them. You should be getting a load of compound interest too. Do you think the PPI bit itself is about accurate? About 40 months paying around £58 a month?

 

I have no idea what you do next, call the FOS I'd guess, but there will be much wiser people to advise you!

Link to post
Share on other sites

so you should get CI on the PPI payments until the card was closed

then 8% stat int

on that figure till today.

 

did you do a spread?

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No I didn't do a SS as Iam missing the first 4 years statements. This is despite threatening court action. They insisted they had no info before 2003. I think the next step is to ask for a breakdown of how they arrived at the figure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you are quite within your right to use an avg of the known PPI payments

for months you don't know.

 

that's in the fos guidelines.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this letter OK to send to Natwest???

 

I have recently received correspondence from you regarding a complaint I made concerning mis-sold PPI on a credit card with Natwest. The correspondence consisted of a cheque for £3285.63 but no explanation of how this sum was arrived at.

 

FSA guidelines state that when PPI is mis-sold the account must be put back to the position it would have been in if the PPI payments had not been applied. You have patently failed to follow this guideline. The interest rate you have used in your calculations (8% simple interest) should have been the compound interest rate of 16.9%. I have reported this breach of the procedure to the Ombudsman.

 

Please supply me with a complete breakdown of how your figure was arrived at and re-calculate your offer to comply with the ruling.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should also make a claim for return of the £1101 balance plus interest that they transferred to their - "I cant believe we've got away with this one" - "Fortuitous recoveries" account , as this is money that they should have refunded to you in 2007 once they realised there was a credit balance on the account and that the account was no longer in use.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Received a breakdown of their offer which shows that the simple interest redress as £956.65 when, using the FOS SS, it should be £1714.41. They have also taken 20% tax of their. figure. As a non-taxpayer how do I reclaim this?

Thanks

suvin

Link to post
Share on other sites

Received a breakdown of their offer which shows that the simple interest redress as £956.65 when, using the FOS SS, it should be £1714.41. They have also taken 20% tax of their. figure. As a non-taxpayer how do I reclaim this?

Thanks

suvin

 

I will ask for you :)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...