Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Cabot have been sold debts after PPI letter sent to creditors


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4088 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Can anyone offer some advice/guidance.....

 

I recently sent an SAR to American express and discovered that I had PPI on the account from 1998 to 2001

(when the account was ceased due to financial difficulites)

 

It was a postal application form and the box for ppi was ticked (I don't recall ticking it but may have done)

 

American express have declined my request for the return of ppi saying there is no evidence that it was missold as it was not a requirement of the credit card.

 

I then received a letter from them and cabot (deed of assignment) to say that they have sold the debt to Cabot (balance is £1400)

 

I was paying a third party debt collector for this debt up until a few years ago when payments stopped and no one chased me for it - it is off my credit file as it defaulted in 2002

 

Question 1 - are they right in what they say about the PPI or should I take this to the next stage? if so on what basis?

 

Question 2 - Can Cabot have this debt put back on my credit file?

 

Question 3 - should I make an offer of repayment to cabot or wait unitl the PPI refund option has been exhausted?

 

ALSO - Another of my debts (creation financial services)

has also been sold to cabot (deed of assignment received this week)

 

I don't consider I owe them any money (balance is £1000) but the original debt was £751 and escalated with charges to £2,000

which i sucessfully challenged and got the PPI refunded to reduce balace to £1000

however over the last 10 years I have made repayments of £800 so I think the remaining balance is just charges that have been added.

 

Just to note I have not acknowledged cabot

- I have been ignoring the phone and not responded to letters until I get some advice hopefully from this site......

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 not they are not correct [mere speculation], its well known apex forms had the boxes pre ticked

 

2 no

 

3. per i'd ignore them. [sound like cash cowing to me]

 

as for the other one

if its charges , then no dice let them wriggle.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for that.

So what is the next step with Amex and the PPI? It wasn't an online application - it was a paper one (just to clarify) the box is ticked (with pen) but I don't remember ticking it - conjecture BUT the tick is different to the other ticks on the form (like the one for my title for example) which what makes me think it was ticked after I posted the application form off (but like I say - I can't prove this) What do I need to do? Refer it to the OBUSMAN?

 

I have read on the forums that Cabot can be aggressive DCA. Should I completely ignore them and hope that they give up? or should I write to them (I feel this will only serve to confirm that they hold the right details for me!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

you'll need to scan up the ppi stuff

how did youcomplain?

 

did you do an FOS CQ?

 

and a spreadsheet of what you had been levied

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you'll need to scan up the ppi stuff

how did youcomplain?

I just sent the FOS CQ. I didn't do a spreadsheet

did you do an FOS CQ?

 

and a spreadsheet of what you had been levied

 

dx

 

Shall I scan a copy of the FOS questionnaire and upload it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

what were you reasons for mis-sale?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...