Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

RBS / Natwest SAR delaying tactics


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4110 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I recently submitted an SAR to RBS,

sent on the 7th Feb and received on the 8th Feb this year.

This was for any and all information in whatever form (as advised by dx on a number of posts).

 

About a week ago, I got a letter from their Mortgage department advising I'd never had a Mortgage. So far all correct.

 

Today however I received two letters.

 

One advising that the Lombard Request I put in should be directed to Santander,

so I'll add that one to the Burton/Tandy/Debenhams pile for my next battle. However, another paragraph in this letter contained the following:

 

'As you have asked us to provide you with all Payment Protection Insurance information,

we have also passed on your request to our Credit Card departments and NatWest Bank to enable them to check whether you had PPI on those products.

The outcome of those investigations will be sent to you separately.'

 

Not once I had mentioned that I wanted PPI information.

 

I've written back to them advising that the information would be welcome,

 

but in order to comply with the SAR that they would need to send me any and all information in whatever format,

reminding them of the date that the SAR would expire.

 

What's more concerning is the letter I got from RBS cards.

 

This advised that they are unable to identify me.

 

Bearing in mind that I'm still a customer of the RBS group (Natwest, but not RBS cards) they would not normally have any difficulty identifying me. All of my Natwest account numbers were contained on the original SAR request which they included with their letter,

the same SAR request that contained copies of my passport and driving license along with all of my previous addresses.

 

They also advised that they were returning my cheque.

 

I'd suggest they check this as I only received a photocopy.

 

I've faxed them back this evening advising them that the clock is still ticking.

 

I've also sent a letter containing my Water bill which will be winging it's way to them first thing tomorrow.

 

Another of my concerns is that RBS have pretty much admitted that they're not going to comply

as they've stated that they may not be able to trace my account as it may have been closed for a longer period than their records are retained.

 

The RBS card was from (about) 1995 to 2001,

Natwest loans in 1991, 1998 and 2004 and a Natwest account from 1988 until today

- I understand that RBS have been known to retain information in an 'archive' format from 1992 to 2001

- can anyone comment if they've been successful in getting such information from them?

 

They've asked me to resubmit the letter and cheque to them when sending the identity documents. Am I correct in thinking that if these are 'resubmitted' this resets the clock? Should I be even enclosing a copy of the original letter? I'd like to remind them that the SAR expires on the 20th March, so they're only wasting their time, not mine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The claim that the bank may not still have some data du to age is ok I think, they are obliged to keep records for 6 years after an account is closed only.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just been through the same scenario with RBS/NatWest. SAR on 3rd October and still getting bits and pieces up to a week ago. I got info on NatWest loans back to 1993 but NatWest credit card only sent 6 years worth. Got bank statements back to 1998.

 

They gave me the run-around too, returning the cheque, sending only PPI stuff, etc. It is down to inefficiency and/or awkwardness.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...