Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Payday Express taken too much!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4129 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I'm new and would like to thank anyone for any help in advance.

 

I had a payday loan for £100, £129 due, with repayment on Thursday. As I have a new bank, they could not automatically take the £129. However, I bank transferred it on the due date (as it said it can be on their website). I sent an email and telephoned them informing them of the payment. All fine... but then:

 

I kept getting calls/texts on Friday and I had also transferred £50 to that old account to cover another bill and PDE took £25. I phoned again, they apologized, said they would issue me with a £25 refund and pass on that its been paid.

 

They took another £25 yesterday and I will face a bank charge aswell as a direct debit rejection charge from talktalk.

 

Is there anyway I can claim the charges back from the mess that is PDE! So annoying!

 

Thanks,

 

Susan

Link to post
Share on other sites

You NEED to write to your bank and TELL them to stop the transactions. You made a BIG mistake using bank transfer, as that allows the PDL to get your bank details. You ONLY repay them using a standing order or prepaid card. That way your money is secure.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

YOu still should write to your bank demanding that they stop any and all transactions to the lender, take it to your branch, and get them to copy and sign/stamp the letter.

 

This company is well known for stripping accounts bare, as you are finding out right now. Luckily you didnt go with one of the worst PDL's who debit the account in £10-20 amounts right after each other until the account is dry.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

well they did take the only £50 I had, but my money is in an account they cant touch.

 

I did only come on here to ask whether I could claim the bank charge or DD rejection charge from PDE as they made mistakes. With respect rene, I didn't expect you to give me a lecture. This was my first ever loan and I was able to pay it back on time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I didnt mean to give you a lecture. I was speaking from experience. Both of my own and helping caggers on this site. We have seen this happen time and time again, and a lot of banks are trying to refuse to refund the money.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok I am sure you were trying to help for which I am grateful.

 

I am obviously frustrated with PDE, as I told them I had paid the full balance of £129 but they still took £50 from me. This is very likely to lead to charges. I will call them tomorrow and try sort it out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No. Do NOT call them. Keep everything in writing. If you absolutely must call them, then make sure you record the call in full. They will say ANYTHING to get you to believe their side of the story. Plus keeping a good paper trail is vital if you want to pursue it further should they refuse to refund the money that they unlawfully took.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...