Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

PPI - Yorkshire/Clydesdale


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4145 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I took out a loan for £4000 with Yorkshire bank in 2002.

 

I have recently put in a claim for PPI.

 

I have the account number and I know the details of when it was taken out, which branch and roughly when it was repaid.

 

They have come back to me and said as it is older than 6 years they no longer have any details other than the loan number I provided them with

so cannot do anything more unless I can provide them with the original loan agreement which I no longer have...

 

..Is there anything I can do now or is that it?

 

Is it worth going to the financial ombudsman?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok thanks, so if I send off the SAR and they say they haven't got any details because they have been destroyed does that mean there is nothing I can do? Or would I still be able to take it to ombudsman as I have the account number? The loan was repaid late 2003

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is going to be extremely difficult without figures for the PPI and the repayments made because no one will now how much in PPI you paid.

 

If you have no paperwork on this loan, how do you know there was PPI on it?

 

Might be a silly question but thought I'd ask :lol:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just remember when I took out the loan and what I was told at the time and also I did have have some documents relating to insurance for the loan, however I have then got rid of most documents before the whole thing of claiming back PPI started, wish I had kept everything now but didn't think I'd ever need it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have they really destroyed the data - and provided evidence etc - or have they just said as it was over 6 years old their policy is to destroy etc. The latter has lots and lots of wriggle room in it for a slippery banker.

 

I'd be tempted to push for an answer to the direct question in your SAR - have you got my data and if not show me proof of destruction? It might just remind them to look in the right places!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...