Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Zimbabwean Looking to coe back to the UK


isabella2008
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4174 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

 

PLease can someone advise me of this. In 1996 my family came to live in the UK on ancestry visa's via my mum who has a british passport. To cut a long story short, my brother got involved with drugs and petty crime etc and failed to meet the requirements of the visa to stay out of trouble with the law, maintaining a job etc...He was arrested for theft and placed in prison and his Zimbabwean passport held by Home Office. He never claimed the passport back for fear that he may be deported. Eventually, we wrote to the home office after he was clean and behaving himself for about 3 years and asked for them to consider re-issuing a visa etc... they said he should return to his home country to apply and so he did in 2010. Ever since then, we have never regretted anything more. He applied for the visa and refused immediatley based on his crimial record. We are so gutted as our whole family are living in the UK and he is stuck out there completely on his own with no home or family and is struggling to survive. Can anythig be done to bring him back? His parents, brothers and sisters and whole family live in the UK.

 

Please help!

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps highlight this to them plus his wife who is a nurse was still working in the country when her visa had expired. I think a lawyer who could use discrimination based on race would be helpful. For once maybe the race card could be used in reverse. I have some connections in Zimbabwe, but mainly in Harare as I lived there when it was still Rhodesia.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

 

Thanks for the response - very interesting article. Where would we start with this? Would I be able to take this up from here or would it be better from Zimbabwe? Thanks again - heartbroken

 

I am not sure how long it is before a conviction is spent, however I think it is 10 years from date of conviction. If I were him, I would make my way to SA, get a job, then a SA passport and re-apply. This may take a few years but at least he has employment.

Second option is an immigration lawyer over here which could be expensive as there is no way you would be able to fight this on your own as you are taking on the Home Office. I would not use a SA based lawyer.

Not exactly what you want to hear, but it will be a difficult uphill battle.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps highlight this to them plus his wife who is a nurse was still working in the country when her visa had expired. I think a lawyer who could use discrimination based on race would be helpful. For once maybe the race card could be used in reverse. I have some connections in Zimbabwe, but mainly in Harare as I lived there when it was still Rhodesia.

 

Why is this race discrimination?.

For this to be discrimination then there would need to be more favourable treatment of a person of a different race : and the OP's post doesn't mention this.

 

It is no doubt hard for the brother, and horrible for the OP and their family : but it is the price the brother pays for committing a crime and sent to prison while on a visa giving temporary residence in the UK.

The terms of the visa are clear & why should the Home Office grant admission to someone who has committed an imprisonable offence while a 'guest' in the UK.

 

As for the poster who suggested "get a South African passport and try again" : if the brother tries this & reveals his prison sentence & failed visa application then the fact it is an SA passport isn't likely to help.

If he conceals the prison sentence & failed visa application in an attempt to deceive and gets found out : he should expect a period of substantial exclusion (up to 10 years) from application to VISIT the UK, let alone application to REMAIN in the UK.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why is this race discrimination?.

As for the poster who suggested "get a South African passport and try again" : if the brother tries this & reveals his prison sentence & failed visa application then the fact it is an SA passport isn't likely to help.

If he conceals the prison sentence & failed visa application in an attempt to deceive and gets found out : he should expect a period of substantial exclusion (up to 10 years) from application to VISIT the UK, let alone application to REMAIN in the UK.

 

By the time they obtain a SA Passport the conviction would have been spent. If the home office can allow a person who tortured and probably murdered people to stay in the UK, a crime committed by the brother becomes insignificant. I have seen first hand what these CIO people did to people of their own race just because they suspected they did not agree with a government policy instigated by the dictator. The country is not safe for any one no matter race, religion or creed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

By the time they obtain a SA Passport the conviction would have been spent. If the home office can allow a person who tortured and probably murdered people to stay in the UK, a crime committed by the brother becomes insignificant. I have seen first hand what these CIO people did to people of their own race just because they suspected they did not agree with a government policy instigated by the dictator. The country is not safe for any one no matter race, religion or creed.

 

2 wrongs don't make a right.

 

If the torturer shouldn't have been allowed to stay them he shouldn't. If he gave reasons why he should be allowed to stay, then the OP's brother needs to establish reasons why he shouldn't be refused a visa, too.

 

The conviction may become spent, but may still need to be declared : is there an exemption from the Rehabilitation if Offenders legislation (as there is for e.g. Employment in healthcare and the criminal justice system)?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...