Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Help working out PPI redress


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4169 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All, long time lurker, 2nd time poster...

 

I am hoping that one of you will be able to help me with a query I have.

 

I have a claim with a company for PPI on a loan that was repaid, they have sent me through a redress offer, but I am not sure if it is correct.

 

The PPI loan amount was £6000, 12 payments were made from October 31 2006 @ £59.41/month

 

Notional redemption cost of PPI when it was paid off was £5794.64

 

Can someone help me work out what the redress should be.

 

I tried filling in the statintsheet and it comes out near (but under) the pre-tax redress offered - if I put in the amount as PPI paid + notional redemption cost as the 'amount of charge' and number of days elapsed since 31/10/2006 - but I don't know if the redress should include the original £6000 PPI payment (which it currently doesn't).

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to confirm, there are no underlying issues such as:

 

Default Notices being issued. - no

 

debt collection Agency involvement. - no

 

Credit Reference Agency issues - no

 

Harrassment already coming your way - no

 

The account was never behind in payment, so no charges, etc on it

 

Bizzisguy

Edited by bizzisguy
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Have a read of No.1 in my signature...all the information you need is in there as well as the spreadsheets.

 

If you get stuck then just shout here.

 

Thanks IMS, sorry to be thick.

 

I settled the loan and PPI (paid back something like £57k on a £56k loan), so, according to your guide, I am entitled to the full £6k PPI premium + interest?

 

Bizzisguy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks IMS, sorry to be thick.

 

I settled the loan and PPI (paid back something like £57k on a £56k loan), so, according to your guide, I am entitled to the full £6k PPI premium + interest?

 

Bizzisguy

 

Found the settlement details from my solicitor when I re-mortgaged

 

The original loan was £50,000

PPI loan was £6000

 

Monthly repayment was £596/month (including the PPI), 12 payments made (£7152)

 

Settlement figure was £55,502.99

 

This to me says that the full £6000 PPI cost was paid in the settlement / monthly payments

 

Does this mean I should also be asking for this £6000 to be paid back as well?

 

BG

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK cash loan £50k and PPI loan £6k = £56k

 

PPI loan is 10.71% of the loan.

 

So for each monthly repayment you made, 10.71% of it was for ppi. 10.71% of £596 is £63.83 so in the spreadsheet (see No.1 in my signature), list 12 payments of £63.83.

 

Settlement figure of £55,502.99 and 10.71% of it is PPI £5,944.37. Deduct from this figure any rebate you received on the PPI at the settlement. Enter the resultant figure as the last itme in the list in the spreadsheet.

 

"Claim to" date should be set to today.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Ims

 

The sheet they have sent through with calculations actually has a section where they deduct PPI insurance from the settlement (so, they offer me a settlement and then say, that the PPI would have cost x amount, deduct that, then come up with the final figure), it's bad enough that they still claim that I wanted PPI, but they have forgotten I paid the initial £6k and now charging another £544 for an 'equivalent monthly paid policy'

 

I want my initial £6k back on top of the settlement.... I was mis-sold PPI!

 

BG.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is not up to them to suggest that you would have bought PPI elsewhere and you need to challenge them on this point.

 

What were your original reasons for the mis-sale?

 

The calculations will be as per my post #6 which gets everything back that you would be entitled to i.e. the £6k premium, the interest you paid on it and the 8%.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ims

 

They originally contacted me to say that I may have been mis-sold PPI on the loan and would I like them to investigate it, to be honest, I didn't even know I had PPI on it, I usually never take PPI out as the job I have is very safe, has been for years (virtually a job for life), plus, I always refused to take it out on loans as I felt it added to much to the monthly payments, so, the fact that I did have it on this loan meant either I was not aware of it (unlikely) or I was told that I had to have it.

 

I shall be writing to them to dispute that I would have bought PPI and to point out that they have neglected to refund the original £6k PPI, the payments for the PPI for a year and the 8% interest per year on the whole lot.

 

I'm grateful for your help and advice, I will keep this thread updated as to how I get on (and no doubt will need advice)

 

Thanks

 

BG

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok so if you were in secure employment with good sickness benefits then you would not have needed the PPI and that you wouldn't under any circumstances have purchased any other PPI.

 

Tell them that it is not up to them to make an assumption that you would have done so and get them to justify their assumption.

 

If you have completed the spreadsheet as I have advised then the figure given by the sheet is what you should get back subject to the adjustment for any rebate you may have received at the point of settlement of the loan.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks IMS

 

I have sent them a letter today, asking them to explain their calculations, supplying them with my calculations and disputing the PPI altogether.

 

With the settlement offered, it would work out that they are actually charging a shade over £3500 for 12 months of PPI protection (that wasn't wanted in the first place), their figures don't make any sense at all, I think they are trying to get out of this cheaply...

 

I look forward to their reply.

 

BG

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi

 

Just an update to this.

 

I wrote to them, asking them to explain their redress calculation sheet as I just could not make head nor tail of it, they have responded back to me and it appears their calculations are correct.

 

Endeavour claim that when I settled the loan, the PPI was cancelled and a rebate applied to the account (to reduce the settlement figure on the loan).

 

I have decided to accept their redress offer as it was money I was not expecting.

 

Thanks for your help and advice IMS.

 

BG

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...