Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Payday Express and CRS help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4231 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi this is the first time i have used the forum so apologies in advance for any errors.

 

My story is that

 

in September 2011 i took out a loan with payday express for £160.

 

I defaulted on this loan but paid back £270 by April 2012 at which time they told me verbally that the loan had been settled.

 

I was then surprised to be contacted by crs saying that i owed payday express £25,

 

i disputed this and gave them details of the transaction i had made with payday express.

 

They went back to payday express with this information and then got back to me saying that payday express had gone through the account

and the amount i owe is actually £125.

 

Seeing as i have already paid £270 for borrowing £160 i am refusing to give them another penny.

 

Any help on this matter would be appreciated

 

Many thanks

jb184

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi this is the first time i have used the forum so apologies in advance for any errors.

 

My story is that in September 2011 i took out a loan with payday express for £160. I defaulted on this loan but paid back £270 by April 2012 at which time they told me verbally that the loan had been settled.

I was then surprised to be contacted by crs saying that i owed payday express £25,i disputed this and gave them details of the transaction i had made with payday express.They went back to payday express with this information and then got back to me saying that payday express had gone through the account and the amount i owe is actually £125.

Seeing as i have already paid £270 for borrowing £160 i am refusing to give them another penny.

 

Any help on this matter would be appreciated

 

Many thanks

jb184

 

Morning jb184.

 

A really good place to ask for advice is .... http://www.stepchange.org ... They were originally the CCCS - Consumer Credit Counselling Service charity. Now called stepchange.

 

I'm not an expert with money issues but they are. Its free and confidential. And you have nowt to loose.

 

Nimitz

Link to post
Share on other sites

paydayexpress forum

 

done

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally i would ignore them but if you do not feel comfortable with that then write to them asking for complete justification of charges and amounts due. In short demand that they prove it.

I do not know if a SAR provides transcripts of or copies of recorded telephone conversations but i am sure someone here could help with that. I do think that might be a sledgehammer to crack a nut though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...