Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Arden and recon on lombard direct loan.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4122 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 108
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

why do you need a temple........

 

simply write what you want to happen

 

my example will do.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

who was the org creditor?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ah i see after merging 3 threads this was a lombard direct loan.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh boy this is mighty confusing

Moorgate/Arden are one and the same, both Solihull if you notice

 

Let me get this right

Lombard Direct sold ( I assume you mean assigned absolutely) the debt to someone, possibly moorgate. If that is the case Lombard will have no more records of your account since the date they sold it.

Arden have sent you a list of payments they say you have made, but these do not add up to what you know you have paid

You sent a cca request and got a recon back also admitting they do not hold the original agreement

 

So I think you first need to check who does own your agreement. One possibility is to check your credit file although if the default was over 6 years ago which I think it is , nothing should show.

The other is to write to Arden asking for the balance of the account, a statement of all payments and if they are acting on behalf of anyone/who owns the alleged debt

 

Now on to MBNA

MBNA sold your agreement to Moorgate/Arden . You sent them a CCA request that they haven't replied to?

Have you sent them a reminder?

 

You need to remember what the definition of enforcement is , there is case law and it is basically anything up to and including the issuing of a summons, although a judge would look very poorly on a summons being issued where there is no agreement so that is only likely (IMO) where they are expecting no defence.

I am basing this on the fact that both agreements are made pre April 2007

 

Have I got that right?

Edited by smithy70
Link to post
Share on other sites

No, Lombard will still hold records that is why we send SARs to the original creditor,debt is sold in bulk with little detail other name. contact details name of OC and amount outstanding.

 

General debt collection letters etc are not to be considered to be enforcement, court action is enforcement.

 

A summons is not issued in a civil case such as this.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry misunderstanding.

Lombard will have no records of what happened to the account AFTER they have sold it, hence it is no use asking them where the money went that was paid to Arden (if the account had indeed been assigned absolutely)

 

Maybe a poor use of words but by summons I was referring to issuing of proceedings in thecounty court. I was hoping people would appreciate that.

 

The meaning of enforcement is set out in McGUFFICK v RBS [2009] and includes anything up to and including issuing of proceedings

Link to post
Share on other sites

IF they sold it.....

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a significant difference between a summons to appear in court and a claim issued in a civil court new users may be led to believe that their debt is a criminal matter.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I can't find my original thread so I have to begin a new one

 

Arden

 

1) CCA'd them - they provide a 'recon' - it has no name, no address, no signature, no T's & C's - nada

2) I write to them tell them it's not acceptable

3)I write a cca non-compliance letter and stated I do not recognise the debt

4) I SAR'd Lombard Direct for all the records they returned the cheque saying all records had been passed to Arden - BUT Arden don't have a copy of the original document.

5) They have now written saying they have passed the account to an external company called 'Resolvecall' who will arrange a visit within 5 days to 'discuss the matter in person' and we may be charged £100!

 

What do I do next?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi roaringgirl.

 

I have merged your threads, to find any thread you have started, click on your own username then 'find all started threads'.

 

Regards,

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please be patient it is a weekend.

Have Resolve Call contacted you, there is little you can do until they do, then you tell them that the account is in dispute,due to non compliant recon agreement.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok - apologies! Ususally I get a response quicker than this! Patience is not a virtue of mine.

 

No, resolvecall have not contacted me - I am going to SAR Arden - I don't think they will have anything, Lombard Direct didn't.

 

If this is the case, then surely they do not have a leg to stand on?

Link to post
Share on other sites

A SAR to Arden imo is a waste of a tenner, they will have data from since they aquired the debt as debts are sold with the minimum of information.

When RC contact you that is the time to act.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok - I know I am being a pain, but I need to get this right.

 

I haven't told Arden we dispute the amount they say we owe.

 

They have not provided a recon either... although they say they have.

 

If I tell resolvecall the account is in dispute and they try to arrange a home visit and charge me £100 - what do I do then?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The charge is nonsense, and a threat even if they do call you do not have to pay it.

 

Also when telling them the account is disputed , tell them visits are not acceptable under any circumstances.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

OMG! I have just got the original debt amount from Payplan from October 2004

 

 

 

Original Debt £2105.95 – Monthly Payments £40.13 x 105 months = £4213.65

They owe us money! A bloody lot of it!!

Ok - how do I deal with this? I want my money back!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok get all the documentary proof of this together, and list it claerly I can easily draft a letter for you to send, if there are details that you don't want on the open forum (bank details eg) please pm me and I''ll do the letter tomorrow.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

said that post 9!!

 

go get 'em ruddy fleecers!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know you did DX :-( - it has taken me a while to get all the info. The same thing has happened with Lloyds - we still owe them but very small amounts. I need to dig up stuff on them too. Won't go on about it in this thread though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok just put it in chronological order for me and I''ll do it in the morning for you.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...