Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

C.A.R.S (Creditlink Account Recovery Solutions) chasing old Monument debt


simmsy77
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4216 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

Today i received a letter from a DCA called C.A.R.S (Creditlink Account Recovery Solutions),

 

they state that they will be attempting to visit me at home within the next week to

'Establish Reasons For Non-Payment' to an old Monument Credit Card (balance of £620.21) which must date back to at least 4 years ago.

 

I have responded by sending them a letter back requesting all communication to be made via letter and no doorstep callers and will immediately follow up with a CCA request.

 

However i've just looked at my Credit Report which lists everything but for some reason this debt is nowhere to be seen on it, what does this mean and is it to my advantage ?

 

many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes very much to your advantage.

 

cars are a very low life lot

 

usual only chase lemon debts that are SB'b years ago.

 

tobe sure i'd get several cra reports

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a shame you've replied to them, they will be all excited now running round like little children thinking they're going to get some money.!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi Guys

 

Am looking for abit of advice.

 

Last month i recieved a letter from a DCA called C.A.R.S threatening Doorstep visits regarding an old Monument credit card debt.

 

I responded by writing to them requesting all contact to be made in writing and also requested a CCA (i used the template letter from the CAG library)

 

Today i recieved a letter from Monument (who i didn't think existed anymore) with a copy of what looks like my original credit agreement dated 20th September 2003 and a copy of the original T&C's.

 

Where do i stand with:

1- the age of the debt

2- do Monument even exist anymore

 

The letter also says that C.A.R.S will be servicing this account and they will provide me with a 'Statement Of Account' and that they consider the Credit Card Agreement to be fully enforcable and that there is no dispute, is this actually the case ???

 

Any help or advice on my next move would be very much appreciated

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

to fully comply with an s78 request they need to provide you with..

 

A copy of the CCA or reconstruction

Terms and conditions from inception

Terms and conditions - current or at default

Statement of account.

 

Are CARS acting as agents for the original creditor or has the debt been assigned / sold to them ?

 

If someone does turn up on the doorstep.. then just tell them to go away.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

to fully comply with an s78 request they need to provide you with..

 

A copy of the CCA or reconstruction

Terms and conditions from inception

Terms and conditions - current or at default

Statement of account.

 

Are CARS acting as agents for the original creditor or has the debt been assigned / sold to them ?

 

If someone does turn up on the doorstep.. then just tell them to go away.

 

Hi CitizenB

 

Thanks, Monument have sent me all of the above apart from the Statement of Account which they say C.A.R.S will forward to me.

i have checked my credit report to see who the owner of the debt but it dosn't come up on there. Monument have just said that C.A.R.S are dealing with the account so i don't know if they've brought the debt or are just acting on behalf of Monument.

They claim that i owe approx £600, would they take me to court for this amount ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK so they have nearly complied with the CCA request apart from the statement.

 

When was the last payment you made on this account to anyone?

 

Why do you feel it may not be enforceable?

 

Hi ims21

 

The last payment made was approx 4 years ago, do you know why would Monument not send out the Statement of Account with the credit agreement etc and leave the DCA to do this ?

many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

i would guess that you were defaulted more than 6yrs ago and its fallen off your cra file

 

having an enforceable cca

does not mean you owe the money they claim as such

 

i'd suspect youll have monuments

payment break plan [ppi]

 

and prob loads of £12 or more PENALTY charges

 

both of which can be reclaimed

 

i'd SAR monument.

 

kight be a waste of £10

 

but monument are known to keep records for longer than 6yrs.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...