Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

GE Money PPI Claim?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4327 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

 

I've been trying to get information together to enable me to reclaim PPI from

GE Money and

HFC Bank.

 

At the time of these loans I was banking with Halifax Bank and then Alliance & Leicester (Santander).

 

Unfortunately, I have lost all details of the loan accounts.

 

I did however have all the acount details for the current account held with A&L.

 

Having read over the last few weeks on CAG the best ways of gathering the information needed I used a SAR template

posted in your library to ask each organisation for all data associated with me and my address (same address for the last 11 years).

 

I posted all the SAR's on 12 March 2012, using the Post Office 'signed for' and included the customery cheque for £10 for each request.

 

On 22 March I got a reply from HFC Bank,

they said they required proof of ID and they had sent back my cheque and SAR.

 

I sent them a copy of my driving licence with the picture blanked out and the signature lined through

I also resent the cheque, the orginal SAR and little note reminding them that the SAR was still in force from the 12 March 2012!

 

Today I received a letter from GE Money saying they are unable to trace this account but if I give them details of the account they will be able to check their databases again! They also sent back the cheque and SAR with their letter.

 

I also received a response from Santander saying they could not find any accounts held in my name

or at my address despite me including the account details!

Low and behold they also have sent back my SAR and cheque!

 

On my Halifax Bank Statements from May 2006

I have payment references to both GE Capital (GE Money) for £233.68 &

Household bank (HFC Bank) for £320.76.

Unfortunately, the bank statement does not supply the account references for the loan accounts.

 

Any chance someone can throw some light on what's going on and any ideas on what I should do next?

 

Sorry for the longish thread :oops:

 

BigPhil61

Many of life’s failures are experienced by people who did not realize how close they were to success when they gave up. - Thomas Edison

Link to post
Share on other sites

anything on your CRA file?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

failure to reply comply letter to GE money then

its NOT SB'eds o should not have [yet] been destroyed, please try harder!!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks dx, I will be posting them a failure to comply letter today! Do you think it would be worth my while to try and get the loan account references directly from the bank (even though the bank account is now closed), if I have all the relevent bank account details along with ID?

Many of life’s failures are experienced by people who did not realize how close they were to success when they gave up. - Thomas Edison

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi All,

 

Santander and GE Money have failed to respond to my SAR's reminder letters or to my LBA's.

 

After reading around the site I get the impression that I should now prepare to take them to court to get them to comply with the DPA and SAR. I believe I will need to fill out an N1 form and ensure that I let them know the case is about DPA compliance. Now this is where I'm going to need some advise please:

 

1. I found a list of court fees (EX50) but I can not find the actual fee for the N1 application I want to make, what is the fee for failure to comply with the DPA? (I read in one thread that it was £30 to submit the N1 and in another that the courts were charging £175!)

2. Do I fill out the N1 form to include both companies or should I complete two N1 forms one for each failure to comply?

3. What needs to be included in the court bundle and do I need to supply 3 copies of all documents in support of my case?

 

Any help you can give regarding the above will be gratefully received.

 

Thanks in advance

Phil

Many of life’s failures are experienced by people who did not realize how close they were to success when they gave up. - Thomas Edison

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All, I just found Shelly181146's thread (Another Barclaycard PPI/Charges claim) and it answers a most of my questions. Cheers Phil

Many of life’s failures are experienced by people who did not realize how close they were to success when they gave up. - Thomas Edison

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi All,

 

Some help with a GE PPI claim, please?

 

I had no information about the loan agreement or even if I had paid for PPI, I had nothing but some old bank statements that indicated that I did have a loan with GE over 7 years ago.

 

After taking advise from members of CAG I duly sent my SAR to GE on 7 March 2012 and waited for a response.

 

I got nothing back but two letter requests for account information so that they could check there systems for the data. I sent them several letters including LBA's but no response regarding the SAR from them at all.

 

I decided to go the top and sent an email to Ana Botin (CEO of Santander) explaining that I was very disapointed with the lack of documents from GE and there failure to comply with the DPA.

 

Two days later I got a call from a Supervisor at Santander applogising promising to get all the information to me within a week, as I had also requested all my A&L banking data as well.

 

Today I finally recieved my GE Money SAR documents from Santander and this is where I need help, advise and guidance. Please find attached the loan agreement that they sent me, I have included the statement of account.

 

GEMoneyEdited.pdf

 

Is it possible that some one has tampered with this agreement at some point after I signed up for the loan?

 

Thanks in advance

 

BP

Many of life’s failures are experienced by people who did not realize how close they were to success when they gave up. - Thomas Edison

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dunno how they've done it but the total amount payable is higher than the actual payments over 60 months.

 

I can't see any ppi as that would have added another £2,523 to the amount.

 

Were you paying more than £233.68 on a normal month or a second payment?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Conniff,

 

I only paid £233.68 per month for the loan as far as I can recall. I'm also thinking that there is something strange about the figures, a cover up perhaps?

 

BP

Many of life’s failures are experienced by people who did not realize how close they were to success when they gave up. - Thomas Edison

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

If you take £250 away from the total figure of 14504.80 this leaves £14254.80 which is the amoun that the payments would come to.

 

Why £250? This is the difference between Total Cash Price of £9756 and Amount of loan of £9506. Did you pay a small deposit of £250?

 

The agreement says a PPI payment of £42.06 per month. Did you have a separate D/D?

 

I would be worried about the tick in the box and also the whole section crossed off.

REMEMBER! Hunger is the enemy - NOT the hungry!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jedicris,

 

I paid no deposit as far as I'm aware, its really confusing me!

 

Why did they more or less ignore my SAR and only when I get in touch with the top guy do they send it with an agreement where the PPI is crossed out in ink, an electronic tick against CPI, my name typed in and figures that do not match up!

 

Has anyone had this type of shall we say 'mistake' happen to them when dealing with GE Money or Santander?

 

BP

Many of life’s failures are experienced by people who did not realize how close they were to success when they gave up. - Thomas Edison

Link to post
Share on other sites

ge money posts moved from your other thread.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi Skyrocket1, I have not done anything with it so far, as I can not find any further details regarding seperate PPI payments! I'm still awaiting a SAR from the Bank I was with at the time and will update if I get anywhere with that! BP

Many of life’s failures are experienced by people who did not realize how close they were to success when they gave up. - Thomas Edison

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Peterdougie, Have you given them a call or written to them and asked them to cancel the PPI payments? BP

Many of life’s failures are experienced by people who did not realize how close they were to success when they gave up. - Thomas Edison

Link to post
Share on other sites

how can they 'fob you off'

ancel my PPI please.

 

end of

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just received a letter in response to my sar on behalf of friend whose account Debenhams Store Card/Ge Capital One (now in control of SANTANDER CARDS UK LTD) goes back to 1998 according to accompanying account notes BUT they only provided transactions from Aug 2005-Oct 2006....accompanying notes shows credit limit reduced in Nov 2011...therefore according to Companies Act 2006 c.46 and Money Laundering Regulations 2001,2003,2007/2157 they have destroyed documents prematurely OR playing concealment

 

They have given a total for the actual premiums offered but to my mind this is far too low in view of historical length of account evidence....so sent in a letter mentioning they have broken the law...as fifth Principle Schedule 1 DPA 1998 does not specifically mention any time limit but the above STATUTES do!!!

 

The FACTS of this particular ppi shows that they have unlawfully destroyed documents BEFORE the time limits...or something more sinister involved...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here are the relevant provisions....but you will need at least a minimum of account history from them to work from...i.e transaction dates...account notes showing nature of transactions..i.e credit limit reduced from or increased to etc...

 

Companies Act 2006 c.46

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/part/15/chapter/2 (see in particular SUBSECTION (3)(a) of Section 386

 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/part/37/crossheading/company-records

 

 

Money Laundering Regs 2003/3075

 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2003/3075/regulation/6/made

 

Money Laundering Regs 2007/2157

 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2007/2157/regulation/3/made

 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2007/2157/part/3/made (in particular see Section 19 Subsection (3)(a and b)

 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2007/2157/regulation/2/made

...for meaning of 'business relationship'

Edited by means2anend
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...