Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

HFC would I be wasting my time.


ATRO
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3729 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

Will try and cut a long story as short as possible.

I have had several loans & credit cards over the years and never had an issue paying for any of them

 

however it transpires I took out a loan with HFC in late 98,

my wife and I split in late 02 and this is when I started struggling to make ends meet.

 

HFC put a default on my credit file (rightly so it seems) and then at a later date I had a DCA chasing me for the outstanding,

thanks to the help of the CAG forums it was proved to be statute barred.

 

Fast forward to today, my credit file is ship shape, me and my new wife (we met a few years ago) are building a decent life for ourselves but money is tight,

isn't it for everyone at the moment?

 

She received a claim form from Santander through the post for mis sold PPI which we duly filled in and sent back

(it was for a loan that she had taken out shortly before we met and we paid off around 18 months ago).

It was front loaded PPI and it seems like she has a reasonable case, we will see.

 

This got me thinking and I started sending SAR letters to all of my old creditors

(all were paid off barring the 1 HFC account) as I hadn't got many documents anymore.

I also sent an SAR to HFC as I had a loan prior to the statute barred one that I did pay off.

 

My question is this,

if I have a case with the HFC one and the claim is upheld would it just be offset against the defaulted loan?

I don't have a problem with this particularly but if it is then I don't see much benefit in putting much effort into that one,

however it would be a reasonable sum and if I claimed PPI on both it would more than outweigh the debt I had left.

 

I was young and naive and the defaulted loan was called "personal loan plus"

which meant they charged astronomical interest and after the years of paying I had paid far more than the original loan amount and still owed more than the original.

It was like a sub prime credit card interest rate.

 

Much point in chasing HFC, or let sleeping dogs lie?

Link to post
Share on other sites

you would NOT be wasting your time

pers i'd sar HFC

 

it been known that info from as far back as 1993 has been gotten

 

then you can claim on ALL accounts with them, there is NO time limit!!

 

as for the offset

 

they can only offset on NOTIFIED arrears.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ims21 and myself BOTH had these types

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice, the SAR is in the post with them however I am expecting them to say all records have been destroyed.

 

I do have a few example statements from them but I guess the next step would be to SAR my own bank to get all my historic statements? When we split up a lot of paperwork was lost/destroyed.

 

Fingers crossed! Thanks again!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Received a letter today basically saying the following:-

 

We confirm the above account has been closed over 6 years.

 

HFC Bank retains account information and documentation for a period of 6 years after an account has been closed. This is done to ensure HFC Bank complies with certain laws and regulations, including The Data Protection Act and The Proceeds of Crime Act.

 

Should you have any queries, please do not hesitate to call.

 

They have enclosed my £10 cheque too.

 

I did ask them on the SAR if my data had been destroyed for certificates but seems they have ignored this request.

 

Do I call, or send another letter insisting on destruction certificates again? If so, do I need to enclose the cheque again?

 

Sorry to be a pain.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

If it were me I would send the failed SAR letter and the £10 payment again.

 

Tell them that if they maintain your data has been destroyed, you want to be satisfied that this is the case and that you want the date of destruction, the method used and the person who authorised the destruction.

 

You could also slip in a line that failure to provide a satisfactory response will be deemed as avoidance of their duties under the DPA and that you may take legal action to force compliance.

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Well you could lodge a formal complaint with the ICO. A quicker solution would be to issue in court for non compliance with the DPA (which a few members have done) and the court would force them to either send you your data or divulge the destruction information.

 

ims

  • Confused 1

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again, I look forward to their dodging tactics, it begs the question why they didn't divulge destruction info when I detailed I wanted that in my SAR.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sadly hfc never will

 

it would be nice to get them against the wall.

if your bowse my posts on hfc

 

somewhere there is a detailed account of how they spent months shedding everything they could when

the ppi storm stated to break

 

they PPI fleeced 100'000's of borrowers

 

dx

  • Confused 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely though if they don't produce then they can face fines/prosecution?

 

At this stage I don't expect a penny from them, however I'm happy enough to be a nuisance for as long as I possibly can be.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bit of a find!

 

Had a rut around and found 3 years worth of photocopied statements for the second HFC loan, these were supplied by the DCA when I had SAR'd them.

 

If I manage to recover all my old bank statements could I then use these statements to work out how much of each payment made was PPI and build my case from that?

 

Or secondly if bank can't produce all old statements could I claim the PPI from these 3 years worth of statements and could that be used as my case?

 

Would I send this claim to HFC or bypass them as they're being obstructive and submit it straight to the fos?

 

Sorry for all the questions, HFC made my life a misery when I was going through a tough period in my life and I just want to serve them a little bit back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if these are for the plus one thats useful. yes you can,.

 

as for the route

 

you should go thru hfc then get a final response.

 

however as we know ims won so they do refund on these oes.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Smashing, cheers, will await what bank sends me as I sent them an SAR for a loan I had a good few years ago.

 

At some point I will be adding threads in other areas as I have a few other SAR letters awaiting responses.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On the personal loan plus would it be compound interest?

 

Just used the compound calculator and for £750 worth of monthly PPI charges from 98-01 it would equate to £14k, would this be right? Or would it be the 8% interest rate?

 

Also, if they come up with nothing else from my SAR would my case be enough to throw in the photocopied statements and build my case from that, i only ask as there are a number of statements missing, can you claim what is there in black and white if you can't build the whole account?

 

Checked the CCA for this one and it states ppi is OPTIONAL, however it is a pre crossed box.

Edited by ATRO
Link to post
Share on other sites

ideally the third one here

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?330996-Latest-Spreadsheets-PPI-Claims-and-Charges-Claims-Dec-2011

 

and yes use any statements you have too.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ahh right, that makes more sensible figures.

 

Thanks again dx, its still worth going after but I'll hold off until they give me a second response to the SAR.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

After a bit to-ing and fro-ing I'm awaiting HFC coming back to me with the SAR, if that shows nothing more than the few years of statements I have i could do with some advice please.

 

This was defaulted in 2004, would it be the FOSCI sheet and closing date be the default date or charge off date or neither?

 

Even though some of the statements have missed payments do I still put that months PPI charge in? Obviously there were other payments that I don't have records of due to the missing statements but I guess not much I can do about that.

 

Lastly, would it be worth starting a seperate claim for charges also or incorporate both into 1 sheet?

 

Thanks for any advice given!

Link to post
Share on other sites

sep claims always.

 

tes use the fosci sheet

it should do it for you

 

even the mising months.

closing date [last ppi payment]

then 8% from that date to today usign the statint sheet.

 

dx

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Right, received SAR back yesterday.

 

Nothing about oldest loan but have all account activity on the personal loan plus.

 

Its absolutely obscene the amount of PPI and charges (will start another claim for them once PPi one is in), its no wonder I got this account in such a mess!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If this goes to fos, we have seen a couple of cases recently where they have sided with the bank and agreed with a set off against a sold debt .This is being challenged.

 

This goes against the recognised case law on the subject which fos do not seem to feel that they need to take on board.

 

Let's see what they do in this case before we get too worried about it though.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers ims the actual claim is larger than the sold debt, by around £2k, so even if they were to offset there is some redress to be made.

 

But as you say, we'll cross that bridge when we come to it.

 

Just totted up all payments made, for an original loan of £5k I made over £10k worth of payments and the charged off amount was still more than the original loan amount!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...