Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Endeavour Personal Finance (T/A HFC)


se0303
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4582 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I honestly don't know what to do about this situation. I've reached the end of my tether, as have my elderly parents, who are being harassed about something that has NOTHING to do with them.

 

I have a 5-yr secured loan with Endeavour, which has been one month in arrears since March 2011 (when I was made redundant). I have otherwise kept up payments on it - it has never been more than 4-5 weeks overdue.

 

Following my redundancy, I moved back to my parents' home while I sorted out all the associated issues. Now I am back on a training course, and am paying my loan to Endeavour monthly (admittedly at the end of each month, rather than the beginning, as I am required - there is simply no way I can pay then, although I have not let the account get out of control).

 

EPF have ignored each and every piece of correspondence (numbering 18-20 letters now) since March - no replies to any of it. They have claimed in telephone conversations to have not received anything. Surprise, surprise.

 

They call, on average, 60-80 times a month. I simply ignore the calls, and write to them once a week, asking them to put matters in writing. They ignore my letters; I ignore their calls.

 

MUCH more seriously, over the last month, they have started calling my PARENTS' home and mobile numbers (I do not know where they got them from - I have not disclosed them), leaving voicemails for me. Over the last week, they have left voicemails threatening, explicitly, court action against my parents, quoting their address, unless I contact them. The latest one simply says "Unless Mr XXXXXX XXX calls us, we will take court action against X, XXXXXXXXX XXXX - parents' address.."

 

This is despicable.

 

I have copies of my letters from 6+ weeks ago, telling Endeavour to remove my parents' (who are in their late 60s) numbers from their systems - they have not done so. Instead, they are threatening them over matters that have nothing whatsoever to do with them.

 

Please, anyone... what should I do? The OFT says it won't deal with individual complaints; Trading Standards say complain to the FOS; the FOS takes months upon months to act.

 

Surely, this cannot possibly be legal??

Link to post
Share on other sites

firstly knowing HFC, you'll be getting unlawful charges on your account

i would SAR them.

 

are writing too:

Endeavour Personal Finance

 

Address: Mallinson House 321 Chase Road Southgate, London, N14 6JT

 

fire off the telephone harrassment letter from the library top left green tab.

 

also give the FOS a ring.

 

i'm suprised TS is passing this on TBH.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...