Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Laptop repaired 3 times in warranty, out of warranty now and still faulty!


hdr
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4588 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

Basically about 6 months in to owning my HP G62 laptop bought from PCWorld, I started getting an intermittent fault with the screen where the whole PC would freeze, and there would be vertical lines on the screen, but I could still see what I was on before. After emailing HP for a month or two, they said that the problem was hardware based, and to contact PCworld, as that was where I bought it. The Laptop has been in to knowhow 3 times now, the third time the laptop was out of warranty, but they agreed to fix it as it was less than 90 days since I had sent my laptop in for the same fault. I recieved my laptop back for the fourth time on Thursday, and today, I have the same problem again. I don't want to send my laptop to be repaired again, because it won't work, and I'll be without a laptop for a week, and when I get it back, it'll be just like it was before. Before phoning knowhow again, where do I stand with this? I bought the laptop for £400, and according to which? the company has to either repair the laptop or replace it, and they haven't repaired it, so can I have it replaced despite being out of warranty?

 

It says If the seller doesn't do this, you are entitled to claim either:

reduction on the purchase price, or

your money back, minus an amount for the usage you've had of the goods (called 'recision').

 

I'd be happy to get £300 back from them, so that I could get a laptop with similar specs to what I have now. Any advice would be much appreciated. Thanks

Edited by hdr
Laptop only went in 3 times, not 4 as I originally thought
Link to post
Share on other sites

hey, I just realised that I only sent the laptop in 3 times rather than 4, but the third was still out of warranty. I don't have the paperwork, but knowhow have my records, so can see when I bought it and when I sent it in and how many times etc. The problem is intermittent, and so when I get the laptop back I can't see straight away if it is fixed, but it soon becomes apparent whether they have fixed it or not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is the fault regular enough that you could sit it on the counter in a PcWorld shop and show the man?

 

If it's not very regular, that will probably be why it has been return to you with the fault still present. They will have run it and as they didn't see the fault, sent it back to you. Common sense says they should contact you and say they can't replicate the fault, and ask what brings it about and can we keep it longer. Obviously they can't see it so have just returned it.

 

Don't worry about it being out of warranty, this is an inherent fault and they should now replace the pc having had 3 attempts at a repair.

 

You need to write to them and ask for an exchange or refund under the Sale of Goods Act 1974. Explain that this is an inherent fault and has been present since purchase. It would be nice to give the dates it was returned, so give Knowhow a ring and ask them for the dates and you can then include it in your letter.

 

I should also mention that it's very unlikely they will agree to it right away and send you vouchers. PcWorld are masters at trying to get around their responsibility so it might take a few letters.

Edited by Conniff
Link to post
Share on other sites

Alright thanks, the fault occurs usually 2 or 3 times a week, so is not very common. I will send the letter, and hopefully get it replaced, thanks for your help!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...