Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

URGENT Help, trying to stop an eviction scheduled for 9 November**SUSPENDED**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4975 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

They are claiming about £12k. I'm pretty sure they are charging me late payment fees, and there's about £5k of solicitors fees applied to the account, but I don't know if this is in the arrears figures or added to the account generally. I do know however, that they are claiming overall that I owe approx £20k more than I originally borrowed. Never quite understood that...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have drafted a statement for Q.10 of the N244. You will need to enter info where there are XXX's at the top and within the body of the statement. The info for the top part will be on the eviction warrant.

 

On the Appendices write the claim number on the top left hand corner of each one and then the corresponding Appendix number on the top right hand corner.

 

Appendix 1 - evidence of your wife's medical condition

Appendix 2 - copy of the letter you sent to them

Appendix 3 - budget sheet

Appendix 4 - copy of your job offer

 

Assemble as follows:

 

N244

Statement

Appendix 1

Appendix 2

Appendix 3

Appendix 4

 

This forms your pack for court and you should staple securely together. Take a photocopy of it all before taking to the court so you have a set to refer to in the hearing.

 

There is a fee of £35 to pay (cash) when you submit the form, and they should be able to give you a hearing date while you are there.

 

These are the instructions for completing the rest of the form.

 

1. Your names

2. Tick Defendant

3. Suspension of eviction

4. No

5. Tick at a hearing

6. 15 minutes

Agreed by all parties: No

7. Write - Not applicable

8. District

9. Both Parties

10. Tick box for attached witness statement

Cross out all options except We Believe

Sign and cross out all options except Applicant

11. Sign and cross out all options except Applicant. Enter your address and contact details.

 

 

Hope this helps.

Parasitewater N244 statement.doc

n244_0400.pdf

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had a call from Platform this morning - they have declined my written offer.

I'll get the N244 into court today.

 

I've Remembered that in early jan 2009, I paid off the whole of the arrears outstanding under the court order, so the arrears I currently have are new arrears; does this make a difference?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you got a hearing date?

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All

 

My Court Hearing was this morning - the District Judge (who was a genuinely nice chap) suspended the evivtion on Terms of payment of the normal monthly payment plus £340 a month towards arrears, stating that "the Council of Mortgage lenders guidance is that Eviction should be a matter of last resort - and in this case there are other options available." He said the fact that I had equity in the property and a person who had not yet reached adulthood lived with me were also factors that he had taken into account.

 

Thank you everybody for your support, (especially Ell-enn - the Judge specifically mentioned that my statement was very clearly set out and showed intelligence and an understanding of the law) and if you are facing similar action by your mortgage company, have heart - the system isnt always against you!

 

Thanks everyone

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fantastic News! well done for being so brave, I hope you can now relax and enjoy your home :-)

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ell-eenn

 

this is not my area so stay with me

 

that judgement about paying the arrears over the term of the mortage

 

does that run alongside a suspended possision order and does that order to suspend run along side the full term of the mortage

Link to post
Share on other sites

In certain cases (where there are very large arrears, or the debtor can only afford a small amount towards them each month), the judge can use the Norgan case law to allow payment of the arrears over the remaining term of the mortgage - but it doesn't happen very often. (I have affixed the details of the case).

However, quoting the Norgan case law at possession/eviction hearings helps as the judge can order arrears to be paid over several years when most lenders want them paid off quicker.

 

A suspended possession order will remain in place while ever there are arrears on the account. Once the arrears are paid off completely you can apply to the court to have the suspension lifted. However, the lender has to agree and they usually want to see a period of payments without defaulting (can be as much as 6 months or a year).

Cheltenham & Gloucester v Norgan and S.36 Administration of Justice.doc

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...