Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Scanned copy of the Experian letter - pp1 & 2


SurlyBonds
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6479 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

The BANK is given the right to disclose to the CRAs. Once the CRAs have your data, they are then covered by the Data Protection Act and you can at any time withdraw your permission under the Act for your data to be used etc.
Ah, but this is to misunderstand what's going on. The CRA doesn't just hand out your data to anyone who asks - not even to the banks. Anyone looking at your data has to have permission from you first. So, your bank gets permission to hold your data, and have it processed on their behalf by the CRA. When you subsequently fill in a credit application form of some type, you will be giving your permission for that lender to examine your persoanal data. Ultimately, it appears that the CRA may not be doing anything which you haven't given your permission for.:-|

Robertxc v. Abbey - £3300 Settled in full

Robertxc v. Clydesdale - £750 Settled in full

Nationwide v. Robertxc - £2000 overdraft wiped out, Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Style Card - Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Abbey (1) - Data Protection Act action. £750 compensation

Robertxc v. Abbey (2) - Data Protection Act action. £2000 compensation, default removed

 

The opinions on this post are those of Robertxc and not necessarily the opinions of the group and do not constitute sound legal advice. You are advised to seek professional legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 80
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I hereby give you permission to look at this blank piece of paper I'm waving about like a loon :D

 

More accurately, you give permission to look at that piece of paper which you believe to be blank :)

HSBCLloyds TSBcontractual interestNew Tax Creditscoming for you?NTL/Virgin Media

 

Never give in ... Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy. Churchill, 1941

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have any of you seen that thread with regards to someone who took equifax to court in 1991 with regards to equifax doing things with his data?? It also came out that they dont actually just get your information when you apply for something they actually do it on the property and check everyone who is living there not just on you. I dont know if this has now changed but that is what i read from the court case on how they process your data when you apply for credit..

If you find this info useful please click on the scales in the bottom left corner of the thread :wink:

 

Vodafone To Remove Default Notices thread

Paid In Full HSBC Was Claiming £3851.42 But Instead of Paying Me Decided to pay my £4900 Loan OffDG Solictors. Need Help

Concluded Lloyds TSB 27/05/2006 Action Against LloydsTSB

Concluded Lloyds TSB for Girlfriend. 27/05/2006

Paid In Full Capital One £160 Settled

Paid In Full Capital One Sent 15/05/06 for £1372 for Girlfriend

Paid In Full Cetelem £130 Settled

Paid In Full The AA £400 Settled

Paid In Full First National £160 Settled

PDA LloydsTsb Credit Card Hand Delivered 26/04/06 £180

Link to post
Share on other sites

The policy changed a couple of years ago in thatthey now only share your data, unless you have a proven link with someone else e.g. a mortgage. Before they provided the info of everyone in your household unless you sent them a notice of disassociation stating that you had no financial link whatsoever.

 

I actually think it was outrageous and a total abuse of people's privacy; I sent off for my report and got back details of all my sister's and my parent's credit accounts, what they'd been given and who had given it, and I'm certain my sister wouldn't have wanted to disclose it to me because she'd got a few '2's ;)

 

I'm not sure if they actually just decided to change their ways, the CRAs, in this matter, or if they were forced...Bloody outrageous though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Several years ago, I was unable to get any kind of credit because a close family members details (with whom I shared a surname AND first Initial), who had been through bankruptcy, appeared all over my credit reports. Many letters and notices of disassosiation later and it was finally sorted but I remember at the time they were very unhelpfull to the facts, and it took months and months to get it sorted..

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...