Jump to content


CCA reply from Hillensden/ DLC, translation, please


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4226 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

LS admin have coughed

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 234
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Thanks for that Dx, so you think I should go back to LS?

 

Problem is, I've been really slack on this and the Six months that Deliottes have giving me to get back to them with this runs out on this saturday. I'm thinking I should upload the reply from LS that claims it's now a matter for Deliotte's and no longer a matter for them. Let you guys and girls have a look at it, cus I'm even more confused than usual :-)

 

how about if I sent a short letter to Deliottes asking them to clarify their role with this claim? Like are they acting as a CMC here ?

Edited by bob1835
Link to post
Share on other sites

up to you

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So basically, what I think I'm asking, is that London Scottish being in 'Administration' isn't a valid defense?

and that I that should continue with the claim to LS

and forget about the Deliottes form.

Edited by bob1835
Link to post
Share on other sites

have you looked for the threads whereby LS admin have coughed and read them...

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry Dx,

 

I've been through 20 pages of threads about London Scottish and haven't found any where they've 'coughed'. The best advice was to phone the FSCS to ask wheather a claim could be brought against LS. I must have been looking in the wrong place.

 

here's a section from LS letter which made me think I could no longer pursue anything against them...

 

We write to advise you that following discussions between the Financial Service Compensation Scheme (FSCS) and London Scottish Finance it has been decided that all complaints that relate to PPI sold by LSF after the FSA introduction of the Insurance Conduct of Business (ICOB) rules on 14 January 2005 will be investigated by the FSCS.

 

This decision has been taken because LSF is in administration and the FSCS has responsibility for dealing with complaints when a firm finds itself in administration and unable to meet its financial obligations concerning policies commencing after 14 January 2005.

 

As your complaint is about insurance policies sold on xxx xxx and xxx xxx, this matter will be passed onto them for investigation, and should you require further information regarding this matter please contactthe FSCS directly at:.....

 

 

I thought Deloittes were acting for the FSCS, not as a claims company - dumb i know, I really am confused. How can they state the above and still pay out? Really lost:|

 

I've tried uploading the letter, both on here and in photobucket it doesn't seem to be my night

Link to post
Share on other sites

earnest and young

 

try them

 

they are the adminstrators

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

any one know the correct phone number for Ernst and Young?

Plan to phone FSCS this afternoon, see if they can help.

 

I'd really like to know if there's a six month window between receiiving a 'final response' from London Scottish and taking the claim to FSCS?

 

Deloitte's say they 'may not be able to help' if we don't contact them within this time, so it doesn't sound that final.

but I tend to be wrong about things like that

 

p.s. does anyone know of any threads/cases where London Scottish have paid out on a PPI claim?

Edited by bob1835
Link to post
Share on other sites

search engine?

 

i know there were at least one

success

but i cant find it now

strange

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...