Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

HFC Marbles card debt and 1st Credit help please!!!


Myfamily
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2877 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 113
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Hi V, many thanks for your reply.

 

Mmm, so I can ignore it forever now? It is strange because I never disputed this with Marbles and we're paying them so why would they not want their money back?

 

As IMS had advised I was not relying on the agreement being unenforceable as I know that if they can show a finacial link then they can take me to court I suppose.

 

I just find it strange that Marble would sell it on when they were receiving payment and now they're getting nothing, makes no sense.

 

Myfamily

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again My

 

Our's is not to reason why...

 

With me, Sharkleys have just sold an old Morgan Stanley account to MK that has already been reassigned via three different companies, notwithstanding that they retain an Egg account that they bought whilst denying another Egg that appears to have to disappeared; meanwhile some clowns at Paragon/Arden (again transferred via three companies) have bought a delinquent MBNA book including my mite.

 

Take you to court? Well, a large part of the Careyesque defence of 'witness statements' from banks - 'we would have had systems in place to comply blah di blah…’ now lacks credibility. I personally think that a paper defence to an OC might be brittle, however, once an account has been sold to ****, one has to wonder why, and the paper trail becomes my friend. Nobody has yet taken me to court and 5 of 8 are floating as ****: I have never nor ever will pay a DCA a penny; I save my F&F sinking fund for court fees.

 

Just my view of course.

 

x

 

v

Link to post
Share on other sites

as 18mts ago

 

totally ignore everyone

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Hi Everyone,

 

well, it's been a while I got a another letter from Cabot shortly after DX's last post, so have been happily ignoring them! :-) . They are now coming to the correct address except that they have put my door number first and then my nieghbours door number straight after it, luckily my neighbour is quite good and just posts letters through our door is she gets something for us.

 

Just wanted to get opinions on this, Got a letter in early Nov which was giving me the various options for payment, then another a couple of weeks later another letter which I seem to have misplaced for the time being!(typical!) but it said that they will give me a discount (the debt is just over £10,000 and they were offering to accept just over £6,000) I didn't have that anyway.

 

Then another letter in early Dec begging me to contact them, I ignored.

 

Another letter in late Dec telling me not to ignore them and that the outstanding balance is payable blah - blah - blah. Threatening to pass on to an external debt collection agency or commence legal proceedings etc, etc.

 

Then in Feb I get a letter saying that they are passing it on to Financial Investigations and Recoveries Europe - F.I.R.E - (oooh, scary!!)

 

Then yesterday I get a letter from F.I.R.E syaing that they have been instucted by their client (cabot) to recover the full outstanding balance - payment is required in full immediately!

 

Now here's the interesting bit.....

 

The inital assignment letter in August 2011 had a balance of just over £9,000.

 

The second letter in Nov has increased the balance by £1,456.36.

 

Then the next one in early Dec has increased the balance by £82.96.

 

The next letter in late Dec increased balance by £52.23.

 

The next latter in Feb increased the balance by £135.19

 

And now the letter from F.I.R.E has increased the balance by £125.97

 

So in total they have added £1852.71 to the balance.

 

Any advice gratefully received!!

 

Thanks

 

Myfamily

Edited by Myfamily
Link to post
Share on other sites

fire are cabot

they add unlawful 12% int on any debt

 

as my last post

 

ignore totally

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

Latest letter from FIRE and surprise surprise, they have added another £95.24 to the balance, I am slightly worried though, I have ignored them completely but they are threatening to send someone round!

 

See letter below.

Link to post
Share on other sites

as post 82

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should imo make a formal complaint re the interest being added and also tell them that you NOT converse with an oik who turns up on the doorstep uninvited!!

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Hello All,

 

Well when it rains it pours :-(

 

Have recieved a letter from Drydensfairfax solicitors saying

they have been instructed to collect debt of now £11,038 (i haven';t calculated yet what's been added)

 

they say I have failed to to make payment etc and

now they want me to contact them urgently to dicuss repayment.

They say if I can't pay in full they may be able to agree to an affordable arrangment.

 

Have told me to contact them beofre 13th dec to prevent furhter action being taken.

 

They says if I do not contact them thier client MAY instruct them to issue legal proceedings and seek a county court judgement against me.

 

Then they say if the issue a claim the claimant will be Cabot

The claim will be for the outstanding balance -blah blah blah

 

in addition to the balance owed under this account they will also seek legal costs which wil increase the debt

 

If they obtain a ccj they may apply to enforce the judgment by one of the follwing methods depending on my circumstance

 

1) if I am a homowner they may apply for a charging order

2) if I am employed they may apply for an attachement of earnings.

3) They may apply for a warrent whcih could involve the court bailiff visiting my home

 

 

Help, help, help!!!! I really do not need this now, after the year I've had. What do I do!??

Link to post
Share on other sites

nothing

 

std threat-o-gram

 

doesn't say will anything.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Hi All,

 

I've got myself all worried again, please see latest letter from Drydensfairfax. Should I be doing anything, I have ignored the other letter from them in Dec.

 

Please can you let me know. I did a CCA ages ago to 1st credit who in reply supplied an application form dated 2004 showing my current address attached to a CCA which shows no date but says expires on last day of June 2010! and showing an address that we moved to between 2007 and 2008! (we moved out of our house and rented it out for while) but we were back to our original address by July 2009 so this is no way the original CCA which I believe they HAVE to have as the application was pre 2007? Is this right?

 

Any Advise would be great.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

usuall phishing trip rubbish

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks DX,

 

Any thoughts on the questions about the CCA? Just wondering as the application form is dated 2004, so is it correct that thay HAVE to provide the ORIGNAL agreement not a recon?

Link to post
Share on other sites

sure

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Early on in this process there was discussion re claiming overlimit credit card fees etc

 

Maybe its worth working out how much in total there is and how much interest in resitution you could claim.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sabre,

 

I have not made a payment since Jan 2011 and have not made any contact with anyone since March 2011 so I'm worried that if I start talking about refunds of overlimit fees I will get myself into trouble.

 

We made agreements with everyone including marbles around March/april 2008 that we would make reduced payments and they agreed to freeze interest then in Oct 2009 to Feb 2010 they suddenly charged interest and over limit fees amounting to around £1200. We didn't notice at the time and continued to make payments untill we were suddenly contact by 1st credit.

 

And that's where it all began, the strange thing is in the beginning Marbles could not tell us why they had passed it on as they were receiving payments.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know you might think that I'm overthinking or panicking but I just need to be sure that what I think about the application form and CCA that they sent me is correct, can anyone help with this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The delightful thing is that with over limit fees and latepayments being over 1200 that when you add interest of restitution to it that it may reduce the balance considerably.

 

Would depend on when charges were applied as to how much.

 

The other good thing is that enforcement action should stop until your complaint is resolved. U would have to take them through the small claims court but there are plenty of people here who have done that and can help you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

no the overlimit fees and late payment fees were only about £200 at the most, the rest of it was interest that was charged from oct2009 to Feb 2010 when they had agree dto freeze interest (i sent the template letter aksing them to agree an amount each month and freeze the interest) Or can I re-claim the interest as they kind of broke the agreement ??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Claiming interest for them breaking agreement. Thats outside my knowledge sadly. Someone else will know though

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

no interest

 

you can only charge int on the PENALTY from each date of each penalty

till they stopped it [charging int]

 

use the CISHEET

 

this is now +2yrs old

 

stop worrying.

 

if its an application form that does not have the T&C's etc etc they know they are sunk.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know, I'm sorry I know that I shouldn't worry but sometimes I can't help it! :-)

 

It's an application form (one sided) then a CCA basically copied onto two sheets, dated much later than the application form. I uploaded them before - they are on post #46 if anyone wants to sneak a peak!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...